Summary
The Reaction Level Scale (RLS 85) is a “coma scale” for the direct assessment of overall reaction level in patients with acute brain disorders. It is devised for reliable use even in the management of patients who are difficult to assess, such as intubated patients and patients with swollen eyelids. We here present the manual of the RLS 85 and the guidelines for its use. The underlying concepts as well as limitations are outlined. Condensed information of known reliability and validity is presented. A training scheme for presumed observers (doctors, nurses and assistant nurses) is outlined. It is suggested that users of the RLS 85 refer to these guidelines and in scientific reports clearly state any deviations from this present manual in order to facilitate valid comparisons between different studies and different groups of patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Psychiatric Association (1987) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Third Edition, Revised. American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC, pp 100–103
Braakman R, Avezaat CJJ, Maas AIR, Roel M, Schouten HJA (1977) Interobserver agreement in the assessment of the motor response of the Glasgow Coma Scale. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 80: 100–106
Brihaye J, Frowein RA, Lindgren S, Loew F, Stroobrandt G (1978) Report on the Meeting of the W.F.N.S. Neuro-Traumatology Committee, Brussels, 19–23 September 1976. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 40: 181–186
Freemon FR (1981) Organic mental disease. MTP Press Ltd, Lancaster, England, pp 81–84
Guildford JP (1975) Psychometric methods. Tata McGraw-Hill edition, Haryana, pp 278–280
Halsey JA, Downie AW (1966) Decerebrate rigidity with preservation of consciousness. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 29: 350–355
Holmgren E, Lindgren S, Stålhammar D (1981) Multiple or single scales in observation at bedside. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 56: 141–142
Jennett B, Bond M (1975) Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. A practical scale. Lancet i: 480–484
Jennett B, Teasdale G (1977) Aspects of coma after severe head injury. Lancet i: 878–881
Langfitt TW (1979) Comment on: Jennett B, Teasdale G, Braakman R, Minderhoud J, Heiden J, Kurze T. Prognosis of patients with severe head injury. Neurosurgery 4: 283–289
Levy DE, Bates D, Caronna JJ, Cartlidge NEF, Knill-Jones RP, Lapinski RH, Singer BH, Shaw DA, Plum F (1981) Prognosis in nontraumatic coma. Ann Intern Med 94: 293–301
Lindqvist G (1966) Mental changes after transsphenoidal hypophysectomy. Acta Psychiatr Scand 42 [Suppl] 190: pp 150
Lindqvist G, Malmgren H (1986) Organisk Psykiatri. Vetenskaps-teoretiska och kliniska aspekter. Filosofiska Meddelanden, Röda Serien No 26, University of Göteborg, Göteborg, pp 61–73
Lundberg N (1960) Continuous recording and control of ventricular fluid pressure in neurosurgical practice. Acta Psychiatr Neurol Scand 36 [Suppl] 149: 140–141
Medical Research Council, Brain Injuries Committee (1941) A glossary of psychological terms commonly used in'cases of head injury. Medical Research Council War Memorandum No 4, HSMO, London
Miller JD, Teasdale GM (1985) Clinical trials for assessing treatment for severe head injury. In: Becker DP, Povlishock JT (eds) Central nervous system trauma. Status Report 1985. NIH, Washington, pp 17–32
Plum F, Posner JB (1980) The diagnosis of stupor and coma. 3rd edition. FA Davies Company, Philadelphia
Price DJ (1986) Factors restricting the use of coma scales. In: Lindgren S (ed) Modern concepts in neurotraumatology. Acta Neurochir (Wien) [Suppl] 36: 106–111
Simpson CJ (1984) Doctors and nurses use of the word confused. Br J Psychiatry 145: 441–443
Stanczak DE, White III JG, Gouview WD, Moehle KA, Daniel M, Novack T, Long CJ (1984) Assessment of level of consciousness following severe neurological insult. J Neurosurg 60: 955–960
Starmark J-E, Heath A (1988) Severity grading in self-poisoning. Submitted for publication
Starmark J-E, Holmgren E, Stålhammar D (1982) Estimation of reaction levels in coma patients. ICRAN, Edinburgh
Starmark J-E, Stålhammar D, Holmgren E, Rosander B (1987) Assessment of responsiveness in acute cerebral disorders. A comparison between the Glasgow Coma Scale and the Reaction Level Scale (RLS 85). Submitted for publication
Starmark J-E, Holmgren E, Stålhammar D (1987) Assessment of reponsiveness in acute cerebral disorders. A critical survey of current reporting with special reference to the Glasgow Coma Scale. Submitted for publication
Starmark J-E, Lindgren S (1986) Possible mechanisms of “vegetative state”. In: Lindgren S (ed) Modern concepts in neurotraumatology. Acta Neurochir (Wien) [Suppl] 36: 121–122
Stålhammar D, Starmark J-E (1986) Assessment of responsiveness in head injury patients. In: Lindgren S (ed) Modern concepts in neurotraumatology. Acta Neurochir (Wien) [Suppl] 36: 91–94
Stålhammar D, Starmark J-E, Holmgren E, Eriksson N, Nordström CH, Fedders O, Rosander B (1988) Assessment of responsiveness in acute cerebral disorders. A multicentre study on the Reaction Level Scale (RLS 85). Acta Neurochir (Wien) 90: 73–80
Teasdale G, Jennett B (1976) Assessment and prognosis of coma after head injury. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 35: 45–55
Åsberg M, Perris C, Schalling D, Sedvall G (1978) The CPRS—development and applications of a psychiatric rating scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand [Suppl] 271
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Starmark, J.E., Stålhammar, D. & Holmgren, E. The Reaction Level Scale (RLS 85). Acta neurochir 91, 12–20 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01400521
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01400521