Skip to main content
Log in

The allocation of memory resources during sentence comprehension: Evidence from the elderly

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two experiments were carried out to examine the ability of elderly subjects to establish syntactically governed dependency relations during the course of sentence comprehension. The findings reveal the manner in which memory constraints operate during syntactic processing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chomsky, N. (1981).Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, G., McCloskey, J., Maling, J., & Zaenen, A. (1983). String-vacuous rule application.Linguistic Inquiry, 14, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, A. T., & Dosher, B. A. (1978). Instrument inferences in sentence encoding.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 479–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, A., & Swinney, D. (1978). The processing of presuppositions during sentence comprehension.Tufts University Papers in Cognitive Science, 7.

  • Emery, O. B. (1985). Language and aging.Experimental Aging Research 11, 3–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feier, C. D. & Gerstman, L. (1980). Sentence comprehension abilities throughout the adult life span.Journal of Gerontology, 35, 722–728.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. A. (1983).Modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. D. (1989). Empty categories in sentence processing.Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 155–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster, K. (1990). Lexical processing. In D. Osherson & H. Lasnik (Eds.),An invitation to cognitive science: Language (Vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, W., & Kucera, H. (1982).Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frauenfelder, U., & Tyler, L. (1987). The process of spoken word recognition.Cognition.25, 1–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garnsey, S., Tanenhaus, M., & Chapman, R. (1989). Evoked potentials and the study of sentence comprehension.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 51–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1988). Working memory, comprehension, and aging: A review and a new view. In G. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 22). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickok, G., Canseco-Gonzalez, E., Zurif, E., & Grimshaw, J. (1992). Modularity in locating wh-gaps.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 21, 545–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J. J. (1970). The 1952 Minnesota word association norms. In L. Postman & G. Keppel (Eds.),Norms of word associations. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemper, S. (1986). Imitation of complex syntactic constructions by elderly adults.Applied Psycholinguistics, 7, 277–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemper, S. (1988). Geriatric psycholinguistics. In L. L. Light & D. M. Burke (Eds.),Language, memory, and aging. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keppel, G., & Strand, B. Z. (1970). Free-association responses to the primary responses and other responses selected from the Palermo-Jenkins norms. In L. Postman & G. Keppel (Eds.),Norms of word associations. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Light, L. L. (1990). Interactions between memory and language in old age. In J. E. Birren (Ed.),Handbook of the psychology of aging (3rd ed.). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Light, L., & Capps, J. (1986). Comprehension of pronouns in younger and older adults.Developmental Psychology, 22, 580–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McElree, B. & Bever, T. (1989). The psychological reality of linguistically defined gaps.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 21–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D., Schvaneveldt, R., & Ruddy, M. (1975). Loci of contextual effects on visual word recognition. In P. Rabbit & S. Dornic (Eds.).Attention and performance (Vol. 1). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monsell, S. (1985). Repetition and the lexicon. In A. W. Ellis (Ed.),Progress in the psychology of language. London: LEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicol, J., & Swinney, D. (1989). The role of structure in coreference assignment during sentence comprehension.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 5–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, S., Kemper, S., Kynette, D., Cheung, H. & Anagnopoulus, C. (1991). Syntactic complexity and adults' running memory span.Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 46, 346–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postman, L. (1970). The California norms: Association as a function of word frequency. In L. Postman & G. Keppel (Eds.)Norms of word associations. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stine, E. A. L. & Wingfield, A. (1990). How much do working memory deficits contribute to age differences in discourse memory?European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 2, 289–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinney, D. (1991). The resolution of indeterminacy during language comprehension: Perspectives on modularity in lexical, structural, and pragmatic processing. In G. Simpson (Ed.),Understanding word and sentence. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinney, D., & Fodor, J. D. (Eds.). (1989). Sentence processing [Special issue].Journal of Psycholinguistic Research.18 (1).

  • Swinney, D., & Fodor, J. D. (Eds.) (1991). Sentence processing [Special issue].Journal of Psycholinguistic Research.20 (3).

  • Swinney, D., & Fodor, J. D. (Eds.). (1993). Sentence processing [Special issue].Journal of Psycholinguistic Research.22 (2).

  • Swinney, D., Ford, M., Frauenfelder, U., & Bresnan, J. (1988).On the temporal course of gap-filling and antecedent assignment during sentence comprehension. Unpublished manuscript, Psychology Department, University of California, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinney, D., & Osterhout, L. (1990). Inference generation during auditory language comprehension. In A. C. Graesser & G. H. Bower (Eds.).Inferences and text comprehension. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wingfield, A., Stine, E. A. L., Lahar, C. J., & Aberdeen, J. S. (1988). Does the capacity of working memory change with age?Experimental Aging Research.14, 103–107.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The writing of the manuscript and the research reported in it were primarily supported by NIH grant AG10496. Support was also obtained from grants DC00081, NS27894, AFOSR91-225, and AG04517 and from the Research Service of The Department of Veterans Affairs. We are very grateful to Tracy Love, Catherine Stern, Margaret O'Grady, and Merri Rosen for their help.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zurif, E., Swinney, D., Prather, P. et al. The allocation of memory resources during sentence comprehension: Evidence from the elderly. J Psycholinguist Res 24, 165–182 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02145354

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02145354

Keywords

Navigation