Skip to main content
Log in

Assessing microcirculation in familial dysautonomia by laser Doppler flowmeter

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Clinical Autonomic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Microcirculatory vasomotor responses to an α-adrenergic agonist and an antagonist were assessed in 11 familial dysautonomia and nine control subjects by laser Doppler flowmetry. Using two iontophoresis machines, blood flow in the midclavicular areas was continuously monitored by two channel laser Doppler flowmeter. Simultaneously, the α-antagonist (0.5 mM phentolamine hydrochloride) and a control solution (0.9% saline) were iontophoresed at 200 μA for 15 min. The α-agonist (0.5 mM norepinephrine bitartrate) was then iontophoresed (20 μA) to both pretreated areas for progressively longer pulses separated by 3-min observation intervals (15, 30, 60, 90, 120 s). The familial dysautonomia subject group had higher mean baseline perfusion with widely fluctuating baselines, especially on the phentolamine pretreated side (P=0.03). Saline iontophoresis significantly increased perfusion in the control group, but not in the familial dysautonomia group (ANOVA:P=0.02 and 0.15, respectively). There was >100% increase in flow by the end of the saline observation period in seven of nine controls, but in only three of 11 familial dysautonomia subjects. Phentolamine iontophoresis differentiated familial dysautonomia subjects into responders and nonresponders by 7–8 min when all nine control subjects, but only five of 11 familial dysautonomia subjects, had >200% increase in blood flow. Irrespective of pretreatment type, norepinephrine decreased blood flow in both familial dysautonomia and control groups (ANOVA:P<0.0001), but the final mean change after saline was greater in the control group,P=0.02. The final mean changes of flow after phentolamine pretreatment were not different between the two groups and were comparable to the familial dysautonomia group's smaller response after saline pretreatment. Higher baseline perfusion suggests dilation may be intrinsic to familial dysautonomia vasculature. Two populations of familial dysautonomia subjects are noted; those who like controls increase blood flow with iontophoresis of the α-antagonist and those who are refractory. In addition, in familial dysautonomia subjects, the microcirculatory constrictive response to α-agonist iontophoresis is less than that observed for controls. These data suggest that some familial dysautonomia subjects may have decreased or dysfunctional adrenoceptors as well as decreased innervation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pearson J, Axelrod FB, Dancis J. Current concepts of dysautonomia: neurological defects.Ann NY Acad Sci 1974;228:288–300.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Axelrod FB, Nachtigall R, Dancis J. Familial dysautonomia. Diagnosis pathogenesis and management. In:Advances in pediatrics. Schulman I (editor), vol. 21. Chicago, IL: Yearbook; 1974; pp. 75–96.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pearson J, Pytel B. Quantitative studies of sympathetic ganglia and spinal cord intermedio-lateral gray columns in familial dysautonomia.J Neurol Sci 1978;39:47–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pearson J, Pytel B, Grover-Johnson N, Axelrod FB. Quantitative studies of dorsal root ganglia and neuropathologic observations on spinal cords in familial dysautonomia.J Neurol Sci 1978;35:77–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Grover-Johnson N, Pearson J. Deficient vascular innervation in familial dysautonomia, an explanation for vasomotor instability.Neuropath Appl Neurobiol 1976;2:217–224.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ziegler MG, Lake R, Kopin IJ. Deficient sympathetic nervous response in familial dysautonomia.New Engl J Med 1976;294:630–633.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Goldstein DS, Polinsky RJ, Garty Met al. Patterns of plasma leveis of catecholamines in neurogenic orthostatic hypotension.Ann Neurol 1989;26:558–631.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Axelrod FB, Krey L, Glickstein JSet al. Atrial natriuretic peptide and catecholamine response to orthostatic hypotension and treatments in familial dysautonomia.Clin Auton Res 1994;4:311–318.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Smith AA, Dancis J. Exaggerated response to infused norepinephrine in familial dysautonomia.New Engl J Med 1964;270:704–707.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Smith AA, Hirsch JI, Dancis J. Responses to infused methacholine in familial dysautonomia.Pediatrics 1965;36:225–230.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hornqvist R, Back O, Henriksson R. Adrenoceptor-mediated responses in skin studied by iontophoresis.Br J Dermatol 1984;111:561–566.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Drummond PD. Adrenergic receptors in the forehead microcirculation.Clin Auton Res 1996;6:23–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lindblad, LE, Ekenvall L, Ancker ME, Rohman H, Øberg PA. Laser doppler flow-meter assessment of iontophoretically applied norepinephrine on human finger skin circulation.J Invest Dermatol 1986;87:634–636.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cohen RA, Coffman JD. β-Adrenergic vasodilator mechanism in the finger.Circ Res 1981;49:1196–1201.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weiser, M., Hilz, M.J., Bronfin, L. et al. Assessing microcirculation in familial dysautonomia by laser Doppler flowmeter. Clinical Autonomic Research 8, 13–23 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02267599

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02267599

Keywords

Navigation