Corticospinal projections to upper and lower limb spinal motoneurons in man

https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(90)90002-2Get rights and content

Abstract

The pattern of muscle activation produced by magnetic stimulation over the human motor cortex has been examined in normal subjects. Magnetic stimulation elicited short latency compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) from upper limb muscles contralateral to the stimulus and from lower limb muscles bilaterally. In the upper limb, the hand and forearm muscles had the lowest thresholds for activation and the largest CMAPs. There was little or no activation of the more proximal muscles, biceps and triceps. In the lower limb the extensor digitorum brevis and tibialis anterior had low thresholds and large CMAPs. There was little or no short latency activation of solcus. This pattern of muscle activation remained the same even when the stimulating coll was moved to various locations within a radius of 3 cm from the vertex. Recordings from individual tibialis anterior and soleus motor units indicated that the differential activation of these muscles reflected the relative amplitudes of the short latency postsynaptic potentials produced by magnetic stimulation in their motoneurons. The ‘jitter’ in the activation of single muscles fibers by magnetic stimulation suggests that these projections are monosynaptic. It is argued that the pattern of muscle activation reflects the projections from the cortex to motoneurons rather than the projections of afferents onto cortical neurons. We conclude that magnetic stimulation can be used to identify the projections of the corticospinal pathways in man.

References (37)

  • A.T. Barker et al.

    Magnetic stimulation of the human brain and peripheral nervous system: an introduction and the results of an initial clinical evaluation

    Neurosurgery

    (1987)
  • S.G. Boyd et al.

    A method of monitoring function in corticospinal pathways during scoliosis surgery with a note on motor conduction velocities

    J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat.

    (1986)
  • W.F. Brown et al.

    Control of the motor cortex on spinal motoneurons in man

  • E.J. Buys et al.

    Selective facilitation of different hand muscles by single corticospinal neurones in the conscious monkey

    J. Physiol.

    (1986)
  • P.D. Cheney et al.

    Comparable patterns of muscle facilitation evoked by individual corticomotoneuronal (CM) cells and by single intracortical microstimuli in primates: evidence for functional groups of CM cells

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1985)
  • J.F.M. Clough et al.

    The distribution of monosynaptic excitation from the pyramidal tract and from primary spindle afferents to motoneurones of the baboon's hand and forearm

    J. Physiol.

    (1968)
  • L.G. Cohen et al.

    Noninvasive mapping of human motor cortex

    Neurology

    (1988)
  • T.C. Cope et al.

    Cross-correlation assessment of synaptic strength of single 1a fibre connections with triceps surae motoneurons in cats

    J. Physiol.

    (1987)
  • Cited by (216)

    • The corticospinal system and ALS

      2024, Clinical Neurophysiology
    • The motor deficit of ALS reflects failure to generate muscle synergies for complex motor tasks, not just muscle strength

      2021, Neuroscience Letters
      Citation Excerpt :

      Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: TMS has been widely used to test connectivity in the human corticospinal system, and this is usually done with the subject at rest. These studies have been very useful at determining the pattern of corticospinal influence over different single muscles and muscle groups [79–81], and the pathophysiology of the CM system demonstrable in the early stages of ALS [82–86]. TMS has also been used to demonstrate that M1 outputs can elicit larger Motor Evoked Potentials in a target muscle when it is employed in a complex action than when the muscle is used alone [87,88].

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This research was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council, the Medical Research Council (Grant no. 6727) and the Easter Seal Research Institute.

    We thank Dr. R.D.G. Blair for the use of the evoked potential laboratory's recording equipment.

    View full text