Conduction block without demyelination following acute nerve infarction

https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-510X(88)90131-1Get rights and content

Abstract

Incomplete infarction of the tibial nerve was produced in 37 rats by injecting arachidonic acid into the femoral artery. Sciatic-tibial motor nerve conduction studies were performed 1, 2, 3 and 7 days later. In all animals the evoked motor responses were of low amplitude and morphological examination showed axonal degeneration. In 20 rats the response elicited by proximal stimulation was of lower amplitude than the distal response indicating focal conduction block in a proportion of those axons which had survived the ischemia and were not degenerating distally. The conduction block resolved over several days and in all but one rat had disappeared by 7 days. Morphological examination of semithin sections and single teased myelinated axons revealed no evidence of segmental demyelination. The rapid resolution of conduction block and the lack of significant segmental demyelination suggest that it has a metabolic basis. We suggest that hypoperfusion of the subperineurial region of the proximal tibial nerve, the region surrounding the infarct through which surviving axons pass, may be sufficient to temporarily block impulse transmission in these surviving axons without producing morphological changes.

References (15)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (42)

  • The electrophysiology of axonal neuropathies: More than just evidence of axonal loss

    2020, Clinical Neurophysiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Interestingly, the nerve fibres of older subjects were more resistant to the anoxic-ischaemic stress (Caruso et al., 1973), and it has been suggested that the increasing resistance to ischemia with aging is related to a progressive reduction of energy requirements (Low et al., 1986). Transient or long lasting CB has been also reported following experimental acute occlusion of vasa nervorum by injecting arachidonic acid (Parry and Linn, 1988). Morphological examination did not reveal segmental demyelination suggesting a “metabolic” nature for CB.

  • Nerve conduction studies: Basic concepts and patterns of abnormalities

    2012, Neurologic Clinics
    Citation Excerpt :

    Conduction block represents a focal pathologic process affecting peripheral nerve. However, although conduction block is generally used interchangeably with suspected underlying segmental demyelination, axonal pathology may also create clinically and electrophysiologically observable conduction block.48,49 For example, acute focal axonal lesions and chronic immune-mediated neuropathies such as multifocal motor neuropathy with conduction block may both be characterized by some degree of axonally mediated conduction block.35,47

  • Neuropathies associated with medical conditions

    2006, Handbook of Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Sensitivity and specificity of different conduction block criteria

    2000, Clinical Neurophysiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    In keeping with the fact that conduction blocks are focal in MMNP and disseminated in AIDP, ratios for the whole arm amplitude decay (Erb's point – wrist) were more sensitive in AIDP, whereas focus on the upper arm segment increased sensitivity in MMNP. We use criterion D in chronic neuromuscular diseases, when motor unit restructuring and delayed conduction have to be taken into account, and we use the less strict limits derived from healthy controls (criterion A) in acute conditions like AIDP or acute nerve infarction (Parry and Linn, 1988). Measurement difficulties alone explain why conduction block criteria have to be stricter in small responses.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text