NoteTactual-kinesthetic matching of horizontal extents by the long-term blind: Absence or reversal of normal left-side underestimation
References (28)
- et al.
Pseudoneglect: effects of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task
Neuropsychologia
(1980) - et al.
Head and body space to left and right, front and rear—II: Visuotactual and kinesthetic studies and left-side underestimation
Neuropsychologia
(1983) - et al.
Braile reading and left and right hemispace
Neuropsychologia
(1982) - et al.
The development of language in Genie: a case of language acquisition beyond the “critical period”
Brain Lang.
(1974) Which hand is the “eye” of the blind? A new look at an old question
- et al.
Functional asymmetry in the reading of Braille
Neuropsychologia
(1971) - et al.
Hemispheric specialization for language in the congenitally blind: The influence of the Braille system
Neuropsychologia
(1984) - et al.
Absence of ear asymmetry in blind children on a dichotic listening task compared to sighted controls
Brain Lang.
(1983) Evidence against the hypothesis of right hemisphere dominance in the American Navajo
Neuropsychologia
(1981)- et al.
Failure to replicate the Scott et al. finding of reversed ear dominance in native American Navajo
Neuropsychologia
(1984)
Is there a best hand for Braille?
Cortex
(1984)
Head and body space to left and right, front and rear—I: Unidirectional competitive auditory stimulation
Neuropsychologia
(1983)
Cerebral specialization in deaf individuals
Literacy and hemispheric specialization for language: digit dichotic listening in illiterates
Neuropsychologia
(1981)
Cited by (17)
Orienting of visual attention in aging
2016, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral ReviewsCitation Excerpt :Some traction on this issue may be gained from studies testing age differences in the phenomenon of pseudoneglect (Bowers and Heilman, 1980). Pseudoneglect refers to the slight but systematic perceptual or visual judgment bias favoring the left visual field in healthy adults (Bradshaw et al., 1986; Brooks et al., 2014; McCourt et al., 2001; Voyer et al., 2012). This bias is attributed to RH dominance for visuospatial attention processing (Benwell et al., 2014; Cai et al., 2013; Cavézian et al., 2012; Çiçek et al., 2009; Fierro et al., 2001; Fink et al., 2001; Thiebaut de Schotten et al., 2011; Waberski et al., 2008).
Near Misses and the Effect of Attentional Asymmetries on Sporting Performance
2016, Laterality in Sports: Theories and ApplicationsAbnormal line bisection judgements in children with Tourette's syndrome
2002, NeuropsychologiaMotor and perceptual factors in pseudoneglect
1999, NeuropsychologiaTactile rod bisection: Hemispheric activation and sex differences
1996, NeuropsychologiaPseudoneglect and reversed pseudoneglect among left-handers and right-handers
1992, Neuropsychologia
Copyright © 1986 Published by Elsevier Ltd.