Unilateral attention deficits and hemispheric asymmetries in the control of visual attention

https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(89)90024-9Get rights and content

Abstract

The present study sought to determine the roles of the two hemispheres in arousal and the selective components of attention. Ten patients with left and right parietal lesions and ten with left and right temporal lesions participated in the experiment. The hypothesis that posterior parietal lesions, whether left or right, cause two selective attentional deficits, namely, a reduced reactivity to stimuli in the visual field contralateral to the lesion, and a reduced reactivity to any stimulus which occupies a relative contralateral spatial position, was tested by asking the patient to tilt their head either to the left or to the right by 90° and to respond to two stimuli displayed above and on either side of fixation mark. The arousal component of attention was studied by analysing the overall RT to visual stimuli independent of their spatial positions. The results showed that (1) patients with either left or right parietal damage are impaired in shifting attention from the ipsilateral to the contralateral visual field, and, within each visual field, in a direction contraversive to the lesion and (2) these two attentional deficits are more severe after right than after left parietal damage. Furthermore, the results show that the difficulty in maintaining a high level of alertness is a specific deficit of patients with right hemispheric lesion and not of patients with an extinction syndrome, insofar as there is no significant difference in overall RT between patients with parietal and temporal lesions.

References (27)

  • S.J. Dimond

    Performance by split-brain humans on lateralized vigilance tasks

    Cortex

    (1979)
  • K.M. Heilman et al.

    Hypoarousal in patients neglect syndrome and emotional indifference

    Neurology

    (1978)
  • K.M. Heilman et al.

    Right hemisphere dominance for attention: the mechanism underlying hemispheric asymmetries of inattention (neglect)

    Neurology

    (1980)
  • Cited by (70)

    • Ipsilesional perceptual deficits in hemispatial neglect: Case reports

      2020, Cortex
      Citation Excerpt :

      On the ipsilesional side, however, certain types of information, such as the metacontrast mask used in this study, may displace preceding stimuli from conscious perception for extended periods of time. Previous studies have demonstrated impairments of attentional orienting towards targets in ipsilesional space when an attentional cue was presented more ipsilesionally, thereby requiring a contralesional shift of attention within the ipsilesional hemifeld (Ladavas, 1990; Ladavas et al., 1989). The current results extend these previous findings by showing extended spatial and temporal processing deficits in the often presumed “normal” visual field in neglect patients.

    • Minding gaps on the skin: Opposite bisection biases on forehead and back of one's head

      2016, Consciousness and Cognition
      Citation Excerpt :

      Building on literature using the graphesthetic task (Stracke, 1947), the former finding (see Section 4.2 for the discussion of the latter) suggests that participants may take an embodied perspective when observing their back with their mind’s eye, hence they display a pseudoneglect. In analogy to explanations of pseudoneglect in the visual modality, this result could be explained by assuming a right-hemispheric dominance in spatial attention (e.g. Làdavas et al., 1989) that also comprises visual imagery, possibly automatically triggered by touch on the back of one’s body. In the visual domain, a right hemispheric dominance of near space processing might further strengthen the pseudoneglect, which is evidenced by various studies showing increased leftwards deviations with decreasing distance between the line and the observer (e.g. Longo et al., 2015).

    • Dissociable effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS reveal distinct functional roles for right parietal cortex in the detection of single and competing stimuli

      2015, Neuropsychologia
      Citation Excerpt :

      Thus, orienting attention to the left visual field is associated with increased activity in the right PPC, and vice versa (Szczepanski et al., 2010). In stroke patients, damage to the PPC often causes deficits in attention in the contralateral visual field, a condition known as unilateral spatial neglect (Kleinman et al., 2007; Làdavas et al., 1989; Suchan et al., 2012). This condition is typically longer lasting and more severe following right- than left-hemisphere damage (Molenberghs et al., 2012; Vallar, 1998).

    • Right hemisphere control of visuospatial attention in near space

      2015, Neuropsychologia
      Citation Excerpt :

      Finally, for lines presented very close to the participant, the leftward bias resulting from right hemisphere activation may exceed the baseline rightward bias, producing an overall leftward bias (i.e., pseudoneglect). Thus, on Longo and Lourenco׳s (2006) interpretation, pseudoneglect reflects the sum of two distinct spatial attentional biases: (1) a baseline rightward bias (Kinsbourne, 1987; Làdavas et al., 1989), and (2) a leftward bias caused by activation of near space representations in the right hemisphere. There is less evidence, however, for a right hemisphere specialisation of near space.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text