CLINICAL PRACTICEReliability and accuracy of the Glasgow Coma Scale with experienced and inexperienced users
References (16)
- et al.
Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness
Lancet
(1974) - et al.
Aspects of coma after severe coma head injury
Lancet
(1977) - et al.
Observer variability in assessing impaired consciousness and coma
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry
(1978) Assessing 'conscious level'
Nursing Times
(1975)Monitoring recovery after head injury: translating research into practice
J Neurosurg Nursing
(1979)- et al.
The description of 'conscious level': a case for the Glasgow coma scale
Scottish Med J
(1982) Glasgow coma scale
Nursing Mirror
(1984)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (213)
Effect of an educational program on pediatric nurses' knowledge, practice, and self-confidence about level of consciousness scales
2023, Journal of Pediatric NursingFamily matters: A systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of family-oriented interventions for children with acquired brain injuries
2023, Clinical Psychology ReviewCitation Excerpt :It should also be noted that although the present review coded the ABI severity using the widely adopted GCS metrics, research findings regarding its psychometric properties were mixed. For example, previous research has suggested that GCS scoring was accurate and reliable among experienced users but not inexperienced users (Rowley & Fielding, 1991, Reith et al., 2017). However, such information was rarely reported in the included studies.
Prediction tools in clinical practice: Carefully read instructions before use
2022, European Journal of Internal MedicineInterobserver reliability of glasgow coma scale scores for intensive care unit patients
2020, Critical Care NurseElectroencephalography in Predicting Short-Term Clinical Outcomes after Cardiac Arrest
2020, Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences
Copyright © 1991 Published by Elsevier Ltd.