Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 342, Issue 8882, 20 November 1993, Pages 1262-1265
The Lancet

Articles
Risk of extrahepatic bileduct cancer after cholecystectomy

https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(93)92359-2Get rights and content

Abstract

The aetiology of cancer of the extrahepatic bile duct is unknown. Gallstones have been proposed to be a risk factor on the basis of ecological and epidemiological evidence. As gallstones are formed in the gallbladder, the occurrence of extrahepatic bileduct cancer in patients after cholecystectomy is of interest. All patients (62 734) who had had a cholecystectomy during 1965-1983 within the Uppsala Health Care Region, Sweden, were followed up to the end of 1987. Excluding the first year of follow-up, 23 cancers of the extrahepatic bileduct occurred vs 26·3 expected for a standardised incidence ratio (SIR) of 0·88 (95% confidence interval [Cl] 0 56-1 31). 10 years or more after operation there was a greater reduction of risk (SIR=0 27; 95% Cl 0·06-0 80). Similar patterns were observed for men and women, and among patients who had undergone cholecystectomy only compared with those who had had their common bileducts explored. To assess surveillance bias the incidence of primary liver cancer was also analysed: SIR = 1·15; 95% Cl 0 91-1·44 overall, and 10 years or more after cholecystectomy SIR = 0·98; 95% Cl 0·66-1 40. This study shows a reduced risk of extrahepatic bileduct cancer 10 or more years after cholecystectomy, indicating that gallstones may be a cause of this cancer.

References (28)

  • Ne Day

    Epidemiological data and multistage carcinogenesis

  • Kw Warren et al.
  • F. Glenn

    Retained calculi within the biliary ductal system

    Ann Surg

    (1974)
  • Cited by (59)

    • Hepatobiliary Cancer

      2012, Clinical Radiation Oncology: Third Edition
    • Biliary Tract Disorders

      2012, Emergency Medicine: Clinical Essentials, SECOND EDITION
    • Hepatobiliary Cancer

      2011, Clinical Radiation Oncology, Third Edition
    • Malignant tumours of gallbladder and extrahepatic bile ducts

      2010, Diagnostic Histopathology
      Citation Excerpt :

      EUS has the advantage to allow direct fine needle aspiration of the suspicious lesions or enlarged lymph nodes. EUS-guided FNA has a diagnostic sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 100%, however has some risk of peritoneal seeding.8 Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) are invasive procedures that demonstrate the site of obstruction in the biliary tree and can also be used to obtain brush cytology, biopsy, and needle aspiration specimens for histologic analysis.

    • Treatment of Gallstone Disease

      2010, Sleisenger and Fordtran’s Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease- 2 Volume Set: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, Management, Expert Consult Premium Edition - Enhanced Online Features and Print
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text