Intracortical facilitation and inhibition after paired magnetic stimulation in humans under anesthesia
References (14)
- et al.
Corticospinal conduction studied with magnetic double stimulation in the intact human
J. Neurol. Sci.
(1992) - et al.
Spinal motor neuron excitability during the silent period after cortical stimulation
Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.
(1991) - et al.
Motor potentials evoked by paired cortical stimuli
Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.
(1990) - et al.
Anatomical and physiological properties of the projection from the sensory cortex to the motor cortex in normal cats: the difference between corticocortical and thalamocortical projections
Brain Res.
(1985) - et al.
Human motor evoked responses to paired transcranial magnetic stimuli
Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.
(1992) - et al.
Physiological basis of motor effects of a transient stimulus to cerebral cortex
Neurosurgery
(1987) - et al.
Magnetic brain stimulation: the silent period after the motor evoked potential
Neurology
(1992)
Cited by (35)
A new temporal window for inducing depressant associative plasticity in human primary motor cortex
2013, Clinical NeurophysiologyCitation Excerpt :The techniques used to probe inhibitory circuits in human M1 in the present study reflect a range of different mechanisms. There is evidence to suggest that SICI and SAI operate through different subtypes of the GABAA receptor (Di Lazzaro et al., 2000; Ferreri et al., 2012; Ziemann et al., 1996), while LICI is mediated by GABAB receptors (McDonnell et al., 2006; Nakamura et al., 1995, 1997). The neural circuit mediating LAI is proposed to have a cortical origin (Abbruzzese et al., 2001; Chen et al., 1999), although this has not been well characterised.
Using paired pulse TMS to facilitate contralateral and ipsilateral MEPs in upper extremity muscles of chronic hemiparetic stroke patients
2011, Journal of Neuroscience MethodsCitation Excerpt :This method enables the study of single or multiple paretic muscles at rest and is more appropriate for investigating MEPs in the stroke population. The use of two pulses of the same intensity has been shown to intensify diminutive or nonexistent responses to single pulse TMS through temporal and spatial summation at the spine and through facilitation at the cortical level (Nakamura et al., 1995). These studies have shown that an interstimulus interval of 10–50 ms with pulses of high stimulation intensity produce facilitatory effects in healthy control subjects in hand muscles (Abbruzzese et al., 1999; Chen et al., 1998; Claus et al., 1992; Kujirai et al., 1993; Valls-Sole et al., 1992) and in biceps brachii (Abbruzzese et al., 1999; Chen et al., 1998).
Noninvasive Cortical Stimulation in Neurorehabilitation: A Review
2006, Archives of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationCitation Excerpt :The magnitude of this short latency intracortical inhibition is quantified as the MEP amplitude produced by the conditioned test stimulus expressed as a percentage of that produced by the test stimulus alone. Another form of intracortical inhibition, long latency intracortical inhibition, occurs at interstimulus intervals of 50 to 200ms when both the conditioning stimulus and test stimulus are suprathreshold.24-26 Short-latency and long-latency intracortical inhibition convey information on intracortical inhibitory mechanisms predominantly mediated by γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)A and GABAB receptors, respectively.27-29
Chapter 3 Neurophysiological Investigation of Motor Neuron Disorders
2003, Blue Books of Practical NeurologyAge-related decrease in paired-pulse intracortical inhibition in the human primary motor cortex
2001, Neuroscience Letters