Apolipoprotein E polymorphism influences not only cerebral senile plaque load but also Alzheimer-type neurofibrillary tangle formation
Reference (21)
- et al.
Alzheimer's disease: mismatch between amyloid plaques and neuritic plaques
Neurosci. Lett.
(1989) - et al.
Genotyping and sequence analysis of apolipoprotein E isoforms
Genomics
(1988) - et al.
Restriction isotyping of human apolipoprotein E by gene amplification and cleavage with Hhal
J. Lipid Res.
(1990) - et al.
Lack of association between apolipoprotein E allele ε4 and sporadic Alzheimer's disease
Neurosci. Lett.
(1994) - et al.
Apolipoprotein E polymorphism and Alzheimer's disease
Lancet
(1993) - et al.
Neurofibrillary tangles but not senile plaques parallel duration and severity of Alzheimer's disease
Neurology
(1992) - et al.
Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes
Acta Neuropath.
(1991) - et al.
- et al.
Alzheimer's plaques and tangles: a controlled and enhanced silver staining method
Soc. Neurosci. Abstr.
(1989) - et al.
Gene dose of apolipoprotein E type 4 allele and the risk of Alzheimer's disease in late onset families
Science
(1993)
Cited by (147)
The influence of a 16-week exercise program, APOE status, and age on executive function task performance: A randomized trial
2021, Experimental GerontologyCitation Excerpt :In the case of this study where Stroop effect on error increased after the exercise intervention for APOE ε4 carriers, we speculate that perhaps neuronal injury in the prefrontal brain region may already be present as a result of possible amyloid-beta (Aβ)- or tau protein accumulation, which is associated with the increased risk of being an ε4 allele carrier. In other words, since neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) and Aβ plaques are known to accumulate years before symptoms of cognitive decline emerge (Dubois et al., 2016; Jack et al., 2013) and ε4 allele carriers are at a higher risk for this type of neuropathology (Ohm et al., 1995), it is possible that these injuries may further limit benefits from exercise to the prefrontal cortex, a brain region central to response inhibition (Blasi et al., 2006). It should be noted though, that this is a hypothesis which is not currently explored by the literature, and further investigation into this possible mechanism would be of benefit to the field.
Early neuroinflammation is associated with lower amyloid and tau levels in cognitively normal older adults
2021, Brain, Behavior, and ImmunityApolipoprotein E and Alzheimer's disease: The influence of apolipoprotein E on amyloid-β and other amyloidogenic proteins
2017, Journal of Lipid ResearchCitation Excerpt :The strong correlation between APOE genotypes and AD, and the presence of immunoreactive apoE in neurons containing neurofibrillary tangles (27, 28) led to numerous clinical and epidemiological studies on the potential interaction between APOE and Tau, both in the context of AD as well as other tauopathies, including FTD. The majority of clinical studies found an over-representation of the APOE-ε4 allele in both AD and FTD (161–164), while histopathologic examinations revealed a significant positive correlation between APOE genotype and stage of neurofibrillary pathology (165) according to Braak staging (166). In support of these findings, the presence of the APOE-ε4 allele significantly correlates with brain atrophy in disease-specific brain regions in both AD and FTD (154).
Animal Models of Alzheimer's Disease
2017, Neuroprotection in Alzheimer's DiseaseAssociation of APOE with tau-tangle pathology with and without β-amyloid
2016, Neurobiology of AgingUsing Pittsburgh Compound B for In Vivo PET Imaging of Fibrillar Amyloid-Beta
2012, Advances in PharmacologyCitation Excerpt :A variety of ad hoc objective approaches have been presented to define an amyloid-positive cutoff using amyloid imaging. These methods include using one or two standard deviations above the mean of the control data (Edison et al., 2008; Kemppainen et al., 2007; Klunk et al., 2004 Okello et al., 2009); inspection of quantitative PET data for natural breakpoints in the distribution of tracer retention in combinations of young controls, elderly controls and/or AD patients (Edison et al., 2008; Gomperts et al., 2008; Hedden et al., 2009; Jack et al., 2008; Maetzler et al., 2009; Mintun et al., 2006; Mormino et al., 2011; Morris et al., 2010; Rowe et al., 2007; Roe et al., 2008); the low end of the range of tracer retention in clinically (Sperling et al.,2009) or pathologically (Fleisher et al., 2011) defined AD patients; receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses of PET data from control and AD subjects (Devanand et al., 2007; Mormino et al., 2009; Ng et al., 2007; Pike et al., 2007); visual reads (Engler et al., 2007; Gomperts et al., 2008; Johnson et al., 2007; Ng et al., 2007; Rabinovici et al., 2007; Suotunen et al., 2010; Tolboom et al., 2009); and cluster analysis methods using both PiB(+) and PiB(−) elderly control subjects (Bourgeat et al., 2010). Each approach has advantages and shortcomings.