Special topic: Recent developments in psychiatric ratingConstruction of a new psychiatric rating instrument, the comprehensive psychopathological rating scale (CPRS)
References (11)
- et al.
A Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale (CPRS)
Acta Psychiat. Scand., Suppl.
(1978) - et al.
Quantitative rating of depressive states
Acta Psychiat. Scand.
(1975) Two anxiety factors in psychiatric patients
J. abnorm. soc. Psychol.
(1962)The assessment of anxiety states by rating
Brit. J. med. Psychol.
(1959)- et al.
A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change
Brit. J. Psychiat.
(1979)
Cited by (54)
Psychometric properties of the EURO-D scale of depressive symptomatology: Evidence from SHARE wave 8
2022, Journal of Affective DisordersLow total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein associated with aggression and hostility in recent suicide attempters
2019, Psychiatry ResearchCitation Excerpt :The CPRS symptom rating is based on a semi-structured interview where the psychiatrist asks open and general questions and the patient is encouraged to describe his/her condition in his/her own words. The reliability and validity of the CPRS have been demonstrated in previous studies (Asberg and Schalling, 1979; Jacobsson et al., 1978) We extracted the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) (Montgomery and Asberg, 1979) and the Brief Scale for Anxiety (BSA) (Tyrer et al., 1984) from the CPRS in order to assess depressive and anxiety symptoms respectively.
Brief Symptom Inventory symptom profiles of outpatients with borderline intellectual functioning and major depressive disorder or posttraumatic stress disorder: Comparison with patients from regular mental health care and patients with Mild Intellectual Disabilities
2016, Research in Developmental DisabilitiesCitation Excerpt :To prevent agreement on the presence of symptoms or distress alone, assessment instruments should preferable be disorder-specific (Asberg & Schalling, 1979). Future research there for should focus on comparing outcomes on disorder-specific self-report questionnaires in patients with BIF to those of informant questionnaires and rating scales like the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale (CPRS) (Asberg & Schalling, 1979; Goekoop & Klein, 1991). Future research should focus on expanding the knowledge on symptom profiles of BIF patients by examining larger patient groups, using different instruments and looking at different psychiatric disorders.
Effect of diagnostic criteria on prevalence of frontotemporal dementia in the elderly
2015, Alzheimer's and DementiaCitation Excerpt :The examinations included ratings of symptoms and signs common in dementia and a cognitive test battery [27]. Psychiatric symptoms and signs were rated with the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale [34]. Frontal lobe symptoms assessed included disinhibition, aggressiveness, hyperorality, hyperphagia, hypersexuality, perseverative or stereotypic behavior, utilization behavior, apathy, emotional bluntness, and loss of empathy.
Decreased aldosterone in the plasma of suicide attempters with major depressive disorder
2011, Psychiatry ResearchCitation Excerpt :The first 40 items are self-reported by the patients, and the last 25 are assessed by the rater (observed). Every item is rated from zero to six, as defined in the original manual (Åsberg and Schalling, 1979). The Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) measures depression and consists of 10 items derived from the CPRS.