Surgery for Tardive Dyskinesia

https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-381328-2.00012-2Get rights and content

Abstract

Tardive dyskinesia (TD) is an often bothersome side effect of antipsychotic treatment. Medical treatment options are usually disappointing. A few single case reports have suggested some efficacy of lesionning surgery (i.e. pallidotomy or thalamotomy). A much greater number of series (including one controlled-study) have assessed the effects of deep brain stimulation applied to the internal globus pallidus. All of them have shown a marked improvement of motor symptoms without any major psychiatric side effects.

Introduction

Tardive dyskinesia (TD), consisting in a wide spectrum of abnormal involuntary movements (from dystonia to choreic-like movements), is an often bothersome side effect of a chronic antipsychotic treatment (for review, see Damier, 2009). For severe cases, medical treatment options are usually disappointing. The first option is to attempt withdrawing the antipsychotic drug if the psychiatric state of the patient permits it. However, in about half of the cases, TD persists even after more than a year without any intake of the incriminated drug. When the use of a neuroleptic is mandatory (e.g., for chronic psychotic diseases), a switch to an atypical neuroleptic such as clozapine is a useful option to consider. The risk of TD is indeed much lower with such a drug than with the classical antipsychotic (Correll et al., 2004). Several add-on treatments have also been proposed for reducing TD. Among them, tetrabenazine is probably the most effective but with the risk of inducing a depression or a parkinsonian syndrome (Kenney et al., 2007). Many other drugs (i.e., vitamin E, calcium channel blockers, noradrenergic antagonists, and benzodiazepines) have also shown to have some efficacy (Soares and McGrath, 1999) In many patients however, despite all these attempts, distressing TD may persist and lead to a severe disability.

Since the late 1980s, there has been a renewed interest in surgery for treating various movement disorders, such as Parkinson's disease, tremor or dystonia. Such a treatment consists in a focal brain lesion or in continuous deep brain stimulation, the currently preferred option due to the reversibility (the stimulation can be turned off if required) and the adaptability (the electrical parameters can be fine-tuned in order to obtain the best ratio between effectiveness and stimulation-induced side effects) of the treatment. Three main targets are used for treating movement disorders: the subthalamic nucleus for Parkinson's disease (Krack et al., 2003); the ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus for tremor (Benabid et al., 1993); and the sensorimotor part of the internal globus pallidus (GPi) for Parkinson's disease and for dystonia (Vidailhet et al., 2005). GPi stimulation and pallidotomy have shown to be effective to treat either generalized or focal primary dystonia. Its efficacy remains more controversial for secondary dystonias (Vidailhet et al., 2005, Vidailhet et al., 2009). Several studies have recently reported substantial benefits of the surgical treatment for severe TD. The results of lesioning surgery and deep brain stimulation in this indication are reviewed.

Section snippets

Lesioning Surgery

A few studies have analyzed the efficacy of lesioning surgery in TD. All of them were open-labeled single case reports. The level of evidence for efficacy for such treatment is thus low. Lesioning surgery corresponded either to a pallidotomy or to a thalamotomy. In one case, a unilateral pallidotomy was performed and a 78% improvement of the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) score compared to the preoperative state is reported after a 2-month follow-up (Wang et al., 1997). In another

Deep Brain Stimulation

The efficacy of deep brain stimulation in TD has been analyzed in a much greater number of series. Most of them are small and open-labeled series or single case reports but one controlled study has been carried out.

In all but one studies the ventroposterolateral part of the GPi has been the chosen target (Damier et al., 2007, Eltahawy et al., 2004, Franzini et al., 2005, Kefalopoulou et al., 2009, Kosel et al., 2007, Sako et al., 2008, Schrader et al., 2003, Trottenberg et al., 2005) (Fig. 1).

Conclusion

In severe and persistent TD, the surgical treatment, especially continuous bilateral GPi stimulation, can lead to a major improvement without any permanent disabling side effects. The level of improvement is comparable to the one obtained in DYT 1 primary dystonia (Vidailhet et al., 2005). No psychiatric decompensation was reported in the studies but the patients suffering from TD were carefully selected, especially for not having any unstabilized psychiatric disorders, and were regularly

References (21)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (12)

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text