Mini-reviewWhiplash disorders—a review
Section snippets
Definitions
Crowe first used the term whiplash in 1928 [1]. Whiplash is generally considered to be a soft tissue injury of the neck, the diagnosis is made after fractures, dislocations and subluxations are excluded. The Quebec task force have suggested the term ‘Whiplash Associated Disorders’ (WAD) as a convenient term because the symptoms are not always confined to the neck [2]. Classically, a whiplash is a hyperextension injury following a rear impact. Soft tissue injuries to the neck can also occur from
Collision velocity
One particular aspect of the genesis of WAD which can be considered puzzling is the difference in velocity and force of injury which may give similar clinical outcomes. It has been shown that in 65% of all rear end impacts there is minimal damage to the vehicle but significant neck symptoms may be experienced [5], [6]. The velocity of impact causing symptoms may be less than experienced by participants using fairground bumper cars [5], [6].
One study of those severely injured in vehicular trauma
Epidemiology
There is no doubt that there are an increasing number of whiplash injuries, the numbers of those injured, reaching epidemic proportions [11]. There has been an annual increase in the number of patients attending an accident and emergency department, after a road traffic accident, from 1982 to 1983 (the year prior to the introduction of the compulsory wearing of seat belts in the UK). There was virtually a three-fold increase in the year after the compulsory introduction of seat belt usage, but
Outcome
Although there is no doubt that WADs occur, there is some dispute about their chronicity. Schrader et al. [16] have suggested that disabling or persisting symptoms do not occur as a result of a WAD but that the symptoms are due to expectation of disability, a family history of neck pain, and attribution of pre-existing symptoms to the trauma. They based their study on the retrospective analysis of accident victims and sex-matched and aged-matched controls. Awerbuch [17] concluded that WAD was
Cultural aspects
Much has been made about the lack of symptoms experienced by Lithuanians with WAD. In the absence of compensation a study population of 202 had full resolution of symptoms within 17 days [16], the suggestion being that compensation created the disorder. It should be noted that this paper has been criticised with regards to method [28]. A further study from Greece has suggested a similar outcome with few victims having persisting symptoms [29]
Pre-existing neck pains
Many patients develop neck pain without being involved in an accident. Marshall et al. [30] assessed the relationship between neck symptoms and preceding injury. They found that there was an increase in incidence of neck pain with age, that there was no significant difference between men and women, and that there was no correlation with the physical nature of the work undertaken. Overall, 34% complained of neck discomfort during or after carrying out normal everyday tasks. Those subjects with
Cause of chronicity
There is no good explanation as to why some patients are left with a severe residual disability. It may be the result of an abnormal psychological response to physical and persistent pain. Wallis et al. [34] studied 137 patients with chronic neck pain after a WAD and found a homogeneous pattern of responses characterised by high somatisation, obsessive-compulsive behaviour, and depression, confirming that the psychological distress exhibited by patients with whiplash was secondary to chronic
Investigations
Plain X-rays are often used to exclude bony injury, it may be that the loss of lordosis earlier reported as relevant may not be an accurate sign of significant musculo-ligamentous injury [40]. Magnetic resonance studies have shown the presence of anterior longitudinal ligament injury, vertebral endplate fracture, disc injuries, and posterior ligamentous injury [41], [42], but the changes may be slight, they may be normal variants, and they may be present in asymptomatic individuals [43]. Other
Psychology
It is agreed that some subjects are less able to cope with musculoskeletal disorders and thus their resolution of symptoms may be slower or incomplete. It has been shown that psychological factors are important in the continuance of symptoms [46] and that psychological profiles can be worsened by whiplash injury [47].
Degeneration
The debate about whether WAD can cause degeneration is not settled and controlled trials are needed [48]. It is thought that those with some cervical spondylosis before their injury will have a slower or less complete resolution of symptoms [20]. Authors have claimed that WAD does cause degeneration and may accelerate degeneration by up to 10 years [49] but their populations were selected and it is clear that patients with pre-existing degenerative changes were not excluded from these studies
Conclusions
Whiplash-associated disorders occur commonly after road traffic accidents. The incidence appears to be increasing, even though there may be a slight decrease in the total number of injuries after road traffic accidents. A significant minority of patients are left with permanent disability, and the severity of the disability decreases with time. The causes of the long-term disability are not known.
Several pleas have been made for scientific controlled studies to gain greater knowledge of this
References (51)
- et al.
Acute neck sprain: ‘whiplash’ reappraised
Injury
(1996) - et al.
Whiplash Injury—are current head restraints doing their job
Accident Anal. Preven.
(2000) - et al.
Neck sprains after road traffic accidents: a modern epidemic
Injury
(1993) Some observations on whiplash injuries
Neurol. Clin.
(1992)- et al.
Whiplash injury
Pain
(1994) - et al.
Natural evolution of late whiplash syndrome outside the medicolegal context
Lancet
(1996) - et al.
“Whiplash injuries” of the neck: a retrospective study
Injury
(1988) - et al.
Neck injuries from rear impact road traffic accidents: prognosis in persons seeking compensation
Injury
(1993) - et al.
Patterns of injury and recovery in whiplash
Injury
(1991) The “whiplash syndrome”
Orthopaed. Clin. North Am.
(1971)
The perceived relationship between neck symptoms and precedent injury
Injury
Prognosis following a second whiplash injury
Injury
Psychosocial stress, cognitive performance and disability after common whiplash
J. Psychosom. Res.
Cervical curvature in acute whiplash injuries: prospective comparative study with asymptomatic subjects
Injury
MRI of the cerebrum and cervical column within two days after whiplash neck sprain injury
Injury
Prognostic factors in soft tissue injuries of the cervical spine
Injury
Whiplash injury and surgically treated cervical disc disease
Injury
Applying the Quebec Tak Force criteria as a frame of reference for studies of whiplash injuries
Injury
Scientific monograph of the Quebec Task force on Whiplash associated disorders
Spine
Whiplash injuries
Br. J. Rhematol.
Do “whiplash injuries occur at low speed rear impacts?”
Eur. Spine J.
Incidental neck symptoms in high energy trauma victims
Irish Med. J.
Cited by (48)
What characterizes individuals developing chronic whiplash?: The Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT)
2013, Journal of Psychosomatic ResearchCitation Excerpt :Whiplash is a common term used to describe injuries of the neck usually associated with motor vehicle rear end collisions [1,2]. Whiplash injuries are generally considered uncomplicated soft tissue injuries — fractures and dislocations are excluded [3]. Most patients who experience whiplash injuries recover within a few weeks [1,4,5].
Whiplash: Current concepts
2013, Revue du Rhumatisme MonographiesA Review of the Clinical Utility of Therapeutic Facet Joint Injections in Whiplash Associated Cervical Spinal Pain
2022, Spine Surgery and Related ResearchExpanding the locus of control - Design of a mobile quantified self-Tracking application for whiplash patients
2016, ACM International Conference Proceeding Series