Influence of beliefs about the consequences of dizziness on handicap in people with dizziness, and the effect of therapy on beliefs

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3999(00)00202-6Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective: To determine the longitudinal relationship between beliefs about the consequences of dizziness and handicap levels in dizzy patients, and the effect of therapy on beliefs. Methods: Symptoms, beliefs, and handicap were assessed at baseline and 6 months follow up in 76 primary care patients complaining of dizziness or vertigo, of whom 33 were assigned to treatment (i.e., vestibular rehabilitation). Results: At baseline most patients believed that dizziness would have negative consequences such as falling, fainting, or losing control. Handicap levels at follow-up were predicted by baseline beliefs that dizziness would have negative consequences. Significant reduction in negative beliefs at follow-up was observed in the patients who received treatment, whereas there was no reduction in negative beliefs in the untreated patients. Conclusions: Negative beliefs about the consequences of dizziness sustain long-term restriction of activity, and can be modified by therapy.

Introduction

Beliefs about illness (also known as symptom perceptions, cognitions, or attributions) may have an important influence on coping behavior. Qualitative research and clinical experience suggests that beliefs about dizziness (including anticipation of severe symptoms, sinister disease, falling, physical harm, and social embarrassment) may lead to avoidance of a range of physical and social activities [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. In a questionnaire study, beliefs that dizziness would lead to loss of control were correlated with handicap (i.e., restriction of normal day-to-day activities) after controlling for levels of somatic symptoms [7]. However, owing to the cross-sectional design of this study it was not possible to ascertain whether negative beliefs about dizziness preceded and caused restriction of activity.

If beliefs about dizziness motivate avoidance of physical activity, then recovery may be retarded, and both symptoms and handicap indefinitely prolonged [7]. Exercise therapy for balance disorders that cause dizziness consists of making movements that stimulate the vestibular organs and provoke dizziness, thus providing the balance system with the repeated exposure to movement necessary to achieve neurological adaptation [2], [3], [8], [9]. Although developed as a form of physiotherapy, exercise therapy contains many implicit psychological elements. The requirement to repeatedly make physical movements that initially provoke dizziness resembles the technique of interoceptive exposure to feared sensations that is used to promote psychological habituation to physical symptoms [10]. Cognitive restructuring of beliefs about dizziness is likely to occur as a result of explanations of balance system function, while deliberate self-induction of dizziness by physical movement may act as a behavioral experiment that builds confidence that movement-provoked dizziness is predictable, tolerable, and controllable [8], [9], [11]. If psychological factors make a significant contribution to patient recovery, the benefits of exercise therapy might be enhanced by augmenting these implicit psychological elements. It is therefore important to determine to what extent beliefs about dizziness play a causal role in prolonging handicap in dizzy patients.

The analyses presented here draw on previously unpublished data collected as part of the assessment of a randomized controlled trial of exercise therapy for dizziness in primary care. Details of the outcome and physical assessments are reported elsewhere [12]. There was significant improvement in the treated relative to the untreated group on five outcome measures (physical and psychological symptoms, movement-provoked symptoms, handicap, and objective balance). The aims of the analyses reported below were (a) to determine whether beliefs about dizziness had a longitudinal influence on handicap and (b) to determine whether beliefs were changed by rehabilitation.

Section snippets

Design and procedure

Patients aged over 18 who consulted their family doctor with a complaint of dizziness or vertigo were recruited and randomly assigned to treatment or control group. The questionnaire measures were sent to participants to complete at home immediately preceding their baseline assessments, at a 6-week follow-up, and at their final 6-month assessment.

Ethical approval was obtained from the relevant ethics committees for all participating GP practices. Participants were excluded if vigorous movements

Results

The proportion of participants agreeing with each belief statement is shown in Table 2. At baseline participants agreed with a median of five negative belief statements, and only five people failed to endorse any of the negative beliefs. Fear of physical harm was most common; over 80% of the sample feared falling over, and fears of fainting and inability to cope with potentially dangerous activities (such as crossing roads or driving) were also prevalent. About half the sample were concerned

Discussion

The data were consistent with our supposition that restriction of activity at follow-up would be predicted by negative beliefs about dizziness. Since handicap levels tended to fall over the 6-month period, the effect of negative beliefs was principally to maintain rather than to increase handicap levels. Agreement with negative beliefs was significantly reduced in treated patients.

Since beliefs and symptoms were correlated at baseline, it seems probable that there is an indirect longitudinal

Acknowledgements

This project was funded by Grant Number 4/93 from the Primary Care Development Fund of the South Thames Regional Health Authority. We are grateful for the assistance of Professor Linda Luxon, Johanna Beyts, Ms. H. Snowdon, and Drs. R. Pietroni, M. Ashworth, M. Tatham, P. Harborow, J. Sikowski, H. Thomas, M. Harrison, J. Hodges, and R. Vella.

References (24)

  • L Yardley

    Contribution of symptoms and beliefs to handicap in people with vertigo: a longitudinal study

    Br J Clin Psychol

    (1994)
  • HC Hecker et al.

    Treatment of the vertiginous patient using Cawthorne's vestibular exercises

    Laryngoscope

    (1974)
  • Cited by (69)

    • DSM-5 somatic symptom disorder in patients with vertigo and dizziness symptoms

      2016, Journal of Psychosomatic Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      The term “functional symptoms” generally refers to symptoms that are characterized by high impairment levels although no structural abnormalities are found [8]. Each patient with VD often presents with a particular pattern of thoughts, feelings, and behaviors regarding the VD symptoms: many patients present with specific affective characteristics such as higher scores on anxiety or depression rating scales [9], cognitive patterns such as negative beliefs about the consequences of VD symptoms [10], and/or behaviors such as avoidance behavior [11] and increased health care utilization [12]. Due to these psychological characteristics, a diagnosis that is potentially relevant to patients with VD is somatic symptom disorder (SSD) which has been newly defined in the 5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-5 [13].

    • Functional and psychiatric vestibular disorders

      2016, Handbook of Clinical Neurology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text