Editorial
Bayesian analysis: what does it add to studies of the natural history of MS?

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-510X(01)00571-8Get rights and content

References (7)

  • B.G. Weinshenker et al.

    The natural history of multiple sclerosis: a geographically based study: I. Clinical course and disability

    Brain

    (1989)
  • B. Runmarker et al.

    Prognostic factors in a multiple sclerosis incidence cohort with 25 years of follow up

    Brain

    (1993)
  • B.G. Weinshenker et al.

    The natural history of multiple sclerosis: a geographically based study: III. Multivariate analysis of predictive factors and models of outcome

    Brain

    (1991)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (7)

  • Prognostic Factors in Multiple Sclerosis

    2007, International Review of Neurobiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Scott et al. (2000) tried to put together clinical and MRI early at onset, in order to predict the short‐term evolution of MS, but the approach they used, limited to onset variables, seems to be an oversimplification of the problem. More sophisticated statistical approaches should be used to better exploit the large amount of variables collectable during the course of MS. In recent years the Bayesian methodology has been promoted as an alternative to the frequentist statistical approach when dealing with medical problems (Berzuini and Larizza, 1996; Spiegelhalter et al., 1999), the MS prognosis included (Weinshenker, 2001). A Bayesian methodology has been already employed to predict the natural history of MS, but only clinical variables were analyzed (Bergamaschi et al., 2001).

  • Natural history of multiple sclerosis

    2005, Neurologic Clinics
    Citation Excerpt :

    Such follow-up studies may measure surrogate markers and robust clinical markers and would have the advantage of correlating change over time in such surrogates with robust ultimate indicators. Bayesian principles are ideal for such an approach [74,91]. Survey communities with complete ascertainment and well-characterized disability profiles, concentrating on overall changes in robust indicators, such as the proportion wheelchair confined or institutionally-confined.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text