Language impairment in motor neurone disease

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-510X(98)00198-1Get rights and content

Abstract

Evidence from recent neuropsychological studies of patients with motor neurone disease (MND) has demonstrated that some patients have cognitive impairment. This challenges traditional teaching that MND is a disease with only motor symptoms. Language processing in MND patients has so far not been studied in any depth, but has only been touched upon as a part of general cognition. This study has assessed nine MND subjects on a range of standardised language assessments and compared their performance to that of nine control subjects. Although this is a small experimental sample of subjects, the results of this study indicate that language impairment is present in some patients with MND. The deficits are subtle and only exposed on formal testing. It is not possible to define the nature of the language impairment from this restricted set of data, but there was evidence of some deficits in a sub-group of MND patients on tasks involving naming, auditory comprehension of complex sentences, some semantic tests and spelling. The implications of these findings are discussed in relationship to the clinical management of patients with MND.

Introduction

Motor neurone disease (MND) is traditionally thought of as a disease involving only motor impairment. There is much research defining the various types of motor degeneration, including descriptions of the bulbar involvement and its effect on motor speech production. There is also some documentation of a form of MND that has an accompanying dementia 2, 8, 11, 12, 19. This is generally thought to be an hereditary form of the disease and, in most cases, the cognitive changes precede the onset of motor symptoms.

There has been some interest in the cognitive and language function of patients with other progressive neurological diseases, in particular, multiple sclerosis and Parkinson's disease 1, 6, 7, 14, 17. However, only a small number of studies have been carried out to examine cognitive function in MND.

Evidence of cognitive change with deficits in frontal lobe executive function in patients with MND has been demonstrated in studies by Gallassi et al. 4, 5, Ludolph et al. [16]and Kew et al. [13]. Language function has not been examined in any detail, but has only been considered as a part of more generalised cognition.

Personal observation of patients with MND suggests that some patients appear to have deficits in certain areas of language function. Deficits have been noted in spelling ability, word finding difficulty and in auditory comprehension of more complex input. These deficits are often very subtle and have only come to light when alternative communication is being considered when the patient is severely dysarthric. The impairments are not obvious in everyday conversation and it is unusual for either the patient or the carer to have made any comment about the presence of such difficulties.

The aim of this study was to examine language function more closely in order to establish if language impairment is a feature of MND and to determine the nature and characteristics of the language function of patients with sporadic MND.

A range of language assessments were selected that are sensitive enough to detect subtle deficits in high level language functioning. These tests were administered to a group of subjects with sporadic MND and also to a group of normal controls. The scores of each of the groups were compared to identify any significant differences in performance.

The following research questions were considered:

  • Is there evidence of any deficit in language function in patients with MND?

  • Are there patterns or specific areas of language breakdown?

Section snippets

Subjects

The MND subjects were those surviving patients diagnosed with sporadic MND in the previous three years. All were already known to the speech and language therapy department but had not necessarily received a formal assessment of their communication. The patients all had a confirmed diagnosis of MND from either a neurologist or a geriatrician.

The final study group consisted of nine MND patients (seven male, two female). The age range was 46–83 years, with a mean age of 64 years (S.D., 11.27

Procedure

The subjects from both the study group and the control group were given a verbal explanation of the background to the study and the research questions this study aimed to address.

All subjects were given a range of tests which examined various aspects of language function, namely, naming ability, semantic processing, auditory comprehension of complex sentences, spelling and reading single words.

The assessments were administered over two separate sessions. This was in order to account for

Statistical analysis

The initial analysis was based on a comparison of the performance of the MND subjects with that of the controls. A series of further analyses were then made examining the performance of some of the MND group compared with all of the other subjects, as it appeared that there may be a sub-group within the MND group. Three of the patients scored consistently lower than the rest of the MND subjects on some of the tests. This will be discussed further in Section 5.

In the analysis of the scores, the

Results

All of the subjects in the study, both MND patients and controls, scored within normal limits on the MMSE [3], therefore, none were excluded because of general cognitive impairment. Similarly, none of the subjects were found to be suffering from anxiety or depression on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) [24].

General observation of the data suggests that the controls were performing at or near ceiling level on all of the language tests. Most of the MND group were also performing

Discussion

There is a suggestion that while language deficits are not common to all patients with MND, it is possible that there is a sub-group who have some change in language function as demonstrated by the consistently lower scores of three of the MND subjects in this study.

The deficits in performance on the language tests of these outliers appeared to be attributable to the MND process as other confounding factors had been controlled in the study design.

It was difficult from this small set of data to

Uncited references

15, 21, 22, 23

References (24)

  • M.F Folstein et al.

    Mini mental state exam: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of the patients for the clnician

    J Psychiat Res

    (1975)
  • W.W Beatty et al.

    Semantic priming in multiple sclerosis

    Bull Psychonomic Soc

    (1990)
  • F Deymeer et al.

    Thalamic dementia and motor neurone disease

    Neurology

    (1989)
  • R Gallassi et al.

    Cognitive impairment in motor neurone disease

    Acta Neurol Scand

    (1985)
  • R Gallassi et al.

    Neuropsychological, electroencephalogram and brain computed tomography findings in motor neurone disease

    Eur Neurol

    (1989)
  • M Grossman et al.

    Specific language impairments in Parkinson's disease

    Neurology

    (1990)
  • Growdon JH, Corkin S, Rosen JT. Distinctive aspects of cognitive dysfunction in Parkinson's disease. In: Streifler M,...
  • A.J Hudson

    Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and its association with dementia, parkinsonism and other neurological disorders: A review

    Brain

    (1981)
  • Kaplan E, Goodglass H, Weintraub F. The Boston naming test. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia,...
  • Kay J, Lesser R, Coltheart M. Psycho-linguistic assessments of language processing in aphesia, Lawrence Erlbaum...
  • J.J.M Kew et al.

    Cortical function in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A positron emission tomography study

    Brain

    (1993)
  • J Kew et al.

    Dementia with motor neurone disease

    Bailliere's Clin Neurol

    (1992)
  • Cited by (34)

    • Syntax, action verbs, action semantics, and object semantics in Parkinson's disease: Dissociability, progression, and executive influences

      2015, Cortex
      Citation Excerpt :

      This test includes eight tasks: (1) motor programming: subjects perform the Luria series (“fist, edge, palm”), first by copying the administrator and then on their own; (2) conflicting instructions: subjects are required to tap the table once when the administrator taps it twice, or twice when the administrator taps it once; (3) motor inhibitory control: subjects are told to tap the table only once when the administrator taps it once, but to do nothing when the examiner taps it twice; (4) numerical WM: subjects are asked to repeat a progressively longer string of digits in the reverse order; (5) verbal WM: subjects are asked to list the months of the year backwards, starting with December; (6) spatial WM: the examiner presents four cubes and points at them in a given sequence; the subject is asked to repeat the sequence in reverse order; (7) abstraction capacity: subjects are read proverbs and asked to explain their meaning; (8) verbal inhibitory control: this task, based on the Hayling test, measures the ability to inhibit an expected response; in the first part, subjects are read three sentences and asked to complete them correctly, as quickly as possible; in the second part, they are asked to complete another three sentences with a syntactically correct but semantically incongruous word. We assessed linguistic (syntactic processing, action-verb production) and semantic (action–action and object–object association) skills using tasks which have proven sensitive to subtle impairments in neurodegenerative motor disorders, including PD (Cardona et al., 2013; Colman, Koerts, Stowe, Leenders, & Bastiaanse, 2011; Cotelli et al., 2007; Ibáñez et al., 2013; Lieberman et al., 1990), Huntington's disease (Kargieman et al., 2014; Saldert, Fors, Stroberg, & Hartelius, 2010), and motor neuron disease (Bak & Hodges, 2004; Cobble, 1998). All tasks were administered in Spanish, the participants' mother tongue.

    • Changes in cognition and behaviour in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Nature of impairment and implications for assessment

      2013, The Lancet Neurology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The topographic distribution of event-related potentials during working memory tasks differed between patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and healthy controls, suggesting that, although clinically impractical, neurophysiological measures might be a useful adjunct for measurement of prefrontal dysfunction, detection of abnormalities at different stages of cognitive processing, and, perhaps most relevant clinically, provision of insight into cognitive processing when advanced disease stage makes standardised neuropsychological assessment impossible.48 Experimental work has extended findings from early studies showing language impairment in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in patients with and without motor neuron disease–aphasia.49–51 Impaired action knowledge (relative to object knowledge) has been noted in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, although scores for this measure correlated with those for executive function tests.52

    • The anatomy of cognitive impairment in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: More than frontal lobe dysfunction

      2012, Cortex
      Citation Excerpt :

      Given the unusual presentation of ALS patients with a predominantly aphasic syndrome, some recent reviews have suggested that like executive functioning, language ability may exist on a continuum with ALS–aphasia at the most extreme end of impairment and milder changes in language occurring amongst non-demented sporadic ALS cases (Bak and Hodges, 2001). A number of neuropsychological studies have found deficits amongst non-demented ALS patients in tasks of confrontation naming (Cobble, 1998; Hanagasi et al., 2002; Kilani et al., 2004; Massman et al., 1996; Mantovan et al., 2003), conceptual semantic processing and syntactic comprehension (Rakowicz and Hodges, 1998). In addition to poorer performance during such tasks, evidence of paraphasias (Strong et al., 1999), decreased phrase length (Ringholz et al., 2005) and deficits in phrase construction (Gallassi et al., 1989) have been described.

    • Language case files in neurological disorders

      2022, Language Case Files in Neurological Disorders
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text