Elsevier

Neuropsychologia

Volume 38, Issue 2, February 2000, Pages 203-212
Neuropsychologia

Movement accuracy constraints in Parkinson’s disease patients

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(99)00059-7Get rights and content

Abstract

This study examined the hypothesis that the kinematics of movements performed by PD (Parkinson’s disease) patients are differentially affected depending on whether or not the aiming movement has an accuracy constraint. The aiming movements required elbow extension in the horizontal plane on a digitizer. There were two movement conditions: (1) one having a spatial accuracy requirement in which the subjects moved to the defined target and stopped on it; and (2) one requiring the subjects to move toward the defined target without stopping precisely on it. Subjects were instructed to make their movements as fast and as accurate as possible in response to the auditory imperative signal.

PD patients modified the movement speed and kinematics depending on the two accuracy conditions. However, when the accuracy constraint was imposed, movement slowness observed in the patients was much more pronounced. The most revealing result was localized to the deceleration phase, particularly as the target was approached. The patients also were found to make a higher number of acceleration zero crossings from negative to positive to reach the target, indicating that the movements were more irregular. For the patients, the first acceleration zero crossing from negative to positive occurred much earlier in the movement than that for the controls. In addition, when movement accuracy was constrained, the number of zero crossings was accentuated. These data show that when PD patients make aiming movements to a target, their deceleration phase becomes longer and more variable.

Introduction

It is known that the spatial accuracy requirement for terminating a movement causes pronounced slowing in Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients compared to age-matched control subjects [32], [39], [56]. For example, Sanes [39] demonstrated pronounced slowing of movements in PD patients related to a reduction of target size and an increase in movement amplitude. However, Teasdale et al. [46] showed that PD patients could regulate their movement speeds as well as normal subjects when no spatial target constraint was imposed. It was also observed that when the movement did not require spatial accuracy, PD patients could saturate their initial EMG burst. The influence of target accuracy on control and coordination of movements performed by PD patients was interpreted as evidence that basal ganglia impairment reduces the capability to control and regulate force parameters because PD patients were less able to regulate velocity and acceleration magnitudes of movements, particularly when accuracy constraints were imposed [7], [56], [57].

Rapid aiming tasks have been used extensively to examine whether there are abnormalities in muscle activation patterns during movements performed by PD patients [2], [15], [18], [19], [41], [46]. A recent animal study using aiming tasks demonstrated that inactivating the putamen or globus pallidus produced abnormal braking of the arm movements and difficulty in stopping at a target [26]. A failure to achieve the correct balance of activation between agonist and antagonist muscles was also observed during cooling of these same structures [24]. In a fast aiming task to a pre-determined target location, tri-phasic (agonist-antagonist-agonist) EMG activation patterns were observed for normal subjects [4], [28], [29]. However, Hallett and Khoshbin [19] demonstrated that Parkinson patients did not show a typical tri-phasic muscle activation pattern during voluntary movement. These abnormal muscle activation patterns in PD patients suggest that basal ganglia impairment also reduces the capability to regulate and coordinate agonist and antagonist muscle activities.

For the movements made to a defined target, the known failure to saturate initial EMG burst could be one of the reasons for movement slowing in PD patients [19], creating a need to produce additional agonist EMG bursts to reach a target. Consequently, the movement duration and trajectory variability are likely to increase. Bradykinetic movements performed by PD patients have been further characterized in abnormal kinematic profiles of movements [15], [35], [42], [51], [56]. Normally, a single, optimally performed smooth movement is characterized by smooth bell-shaped velocity profiles with single acceleration and deceleration components between the movement initiation and termination [21]. PD patients exhibited asymmetrical velocity profiles with a prolonged deceleration phase [15], [56]. Furthermore, PD patients showed several alternating phases of acceleration and deceleration during movements [15], [35], indicating that their movements were segmented.

In contrast to the results of the aiming movements to a defined target by Hallett and Khoshbin [19], our laboratory has previously shown [46] that when accuracy requirements were minimized, PD patients were able to scale their movement speeds as instructed and saturate their initial EMG burst. Thus, it appears that activation of the initial EMG burst is not a fundamental impairment in the PD patients. Such selective impairments of the muscle activation should consequently influence the movement kinematics of the PD patients. We, therefore, hypothesized that the kinematics of movements should be different depending on whether the terminal accuracy is constrained. To our knowledge, no study comparing kinematics of movements between conditions with/without accuracy constraint has been carried out previously in PD patients. It is known that increased accuracy demand, typically causes normal subjects to slow their movements by shortening the acceleration phase and lengthening the deceleration phase. The decelerating phase is lengthened presumably to allow for more error corrective adjustments [30], [52]. These corrections are typically observed in the form of a zero crossing in the acceleration curve. A zero crossing is when the acceleration curve changes from negative to positive and typically reflects changes in the control and regulation of the movement.

This experiment examined the hypothesis that the kinematics of the movements in PD patients are selectively altered depending on whether the aiming movement has a terminal accuracy requirement. In one condition subjects terminated their movements at a defined target location. In the second condition they made a movement to the same target but were not required to stop the movement on the target. The crucial difference between the two conditions is whether the movements had to be precisely terminated. Kinematic profiles were compared between the PD patients and age-matched controls in the two accuracy conditions. Based on our earlier findings that PD patients do saturate their initial EMG bursts when a spatial accuracy is removed [46], we postulated that the kinematic profiles of these aiming movements would be different between the two groups in the accuracy condition but that the differences would be minimized in the no accuracy condition. The results support the prediction that the slower movement observed in PD patients was more pronounced when the terminal accuracy constraint was imposed. In addition, the kinematics of PD patients were abnormal, characterized by a higher number of acceleration zero crossings and that the first zero crossing occurred much earlier in the movement. Preliminary studies were reported elsewhere [37], [38].

Section snippets

Subjects

Ten subjects with Parkinson’s disease (mean age: 73.2±10.3 years; 8 males and 2 females) and ten age-matched control subjects (mean age: 70.6±4.6 years; 5 males and 5 females) participated in the study. The severity of the disease ranged from Stage I to III on the Hoehn and Yahr scale [20]. At the time of the experiment, the PD patients were on medication. The controls showed no signs of neurological disease. All subjects were right handed except for one PD subject, who was left-handed.

Results

Fig. 2 shows typical velocity and acceleration profiles for the target and no target condition for a control subject (Fig. 2, A and B) and a Parkinson’s patient (Fig. 2, C and D). Upper panels in the figure display movement velocity curves (A and C), and the lower panels display acceleration curves (B and D) for the target and no-target conditions, respectively. As can be seen in the figure, when the control subject did not have to stop at the target (dashed line), movements were smooth and

Discussion

The purpose of this study was to examine the hypothesis that movement kinematics are selectively affected depending on whether movements have an accuracy constraint. The data showed that both PD patients and controls modified their movement depending on the accuracy demand, as reflected in movement times (Fig. 3) as well as in the velocity and acceleration profiles (Fig. 5, A and B) between the two conditions. This suggests that speed/accuracy transformation processes associated with motor

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by grants from NINDS-NS17421, NINDS-NS33173 and the R.S. Flinn Foundation.

References (57)

  • S.H. Brown et al.

    Initial agonist burst duration depends on movement amplitude

    Experimental Brain Research

    (1984)
  • P. Brown et al.

    Does Parkinsonian action tremor contribute to muscle weakness in Parkinson’s disease?

    Brain

    (1997)
  • L.G. Carlton

    Processing visual feedback information for movement control

    Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

    (1981)
  • J.L. Contreras-Vidal et al.

    A neural model of basal ganglia-thalamocortical relations in normal and Parkinsonian movement

    Biological Cybernetics

    (1995)
  • J.D. Cooke et al.

    Increased dependence on visual information for movement control in patients with Parkinson’s disease

    Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences

    (1978)
  • D.M. Corcos et al.

    Strength in Parkinson’s disease: relationship to rate of force generation and clinical status

    Annals of Neurology

    (1996)
  • E.R.F.W. Crossman et al.

    Feedback control of hand-movement and Fitts’ law

    Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

    (1983)
  • J.E. Desmedt et al.

    Ballistic contractions in man: characteristic recruitment pattern of single motor units of the tibialis anterior muscle

    Journal of Physiology (London)

    (1977)
  • J.E. Desmedt et al.

    Ballistic contractions in fast or slow human muscles: discharge patterns of single motor units

    Journal of Physiology (London)

    (1978)
  • V. Dietz et al.

    Correlation between tremor, voluntary contraction, and firing pattern of motor units in Parkinson’s disease

    Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry

    (1974)
  • I.T. Draper et al.

    The disorders of movement in Parkinsonism and the effect of drug treatment

    Johns Hopkins Hospital Bulletin

    (1964)
  • K. Flowers

    Ballistic and corrective movements on an aiming task: intention tremor and Parkinsonian movement disorders compared

    Neurology

    (1975)
  • K.A. Flowers

    Visual ‘closed-loop’ and ‘open-loop’ characteristics of voluntary movement in patients with Parkinsonism and intention tremor

    Brain

    (1976)
  • M. Hallett et al.

    Analysis of stereotyped voluntary movements at the elbow in patients with Parkinson’s disease

    Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry

    (1977)
  • M. Hallett et al.

    A physiological mechanisms of bradykinesia

    Brain

    (1980)
  • M.M. Hoehn et al.

    Parkinsonism: onset, progression, and mortality

    Neurology

    (1967)
  • F.B. Horak et al.

    Influence of globus pallidus on arm movements in monkeys—I: effects of kainik acid-induced lesions

    Journal of Neurophysiology

    (1984)
  • F.B. Horak et al.

    Influence of globus pallidus on arm movements in monkeys—II: effects of stimulation

    Journal of Neurophysiology

    (1984)
  • Cited by (70)

    • Instrumented assessment of shoulder function: A study of inertial sensor based methods

      2020, Clinical Biomechanics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Movement smoothness is a feature related to the non-intermittency of movement and can be observed through accelerometer or velocity profiles. Smoothness is largely considered a property of well-developed motor behaviour and can be related to numerous factors including the nature of the task, familiarity with the task and neuromuscular impairment (Carpinella et al., 2009; Rand et al., 2000; Tresilian et al., 1997). Common methods to quantify smoothness using inertial data include quantifying velocity peaks, quantifying rate of change of movement acceleration and analysing the frequency composition within velocity or acceleration profiles (Gulde and Hermsdorfer, 2018).

    • Being on Target: Visual Information during Writing Affects Effective Connectivity in Parkinson's Disease

      2018, Neuroscience
      Citation Excerpt :

      These behavioral findings are supported by a recent review stressing the fact that additional visual information can increase difficulty for the writer, due to greater accuracy requirements, resulting in slower handwriting movements (Danna and Velay, 2015). Despite the fact that accuracy was not encouraged by the instructional set during the experiment, PD patients and controls may have perceived aiming for the targets as an accuracy requirement, with compromised performance as a result (Rand et al., 2000). The enhanced coupling between parietal and supplementary motor areas in the absence of cues is consistent with the greater involvement of the SMA during internally controlled handwriting movements (Jenkins et al., 2000; Debaere et al., 2003).

    • Reproducibility of standardized fine motor control tasks and age effects in healthy adults

      2018, Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation
    • Reward Pays the Cost of Noise Reduction in Motor and Cognitive Control

      2015, Current Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      In the model, this corresponded to a greater cost of controlling noise. The results are in line with previous evidence that, for a matched speed, PD patients’ movements are less accurate [44] and cognitive control errors more frequent [45]. Could the loss of reward sensitivity in PD be explained simply by patients performing at their ceiling?

    • Learning and switching between stimulus-saccade associations in Parkinson's disease

      2013, Neuropsychologia
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, when movements are executed under memory-guided conditions saccades become markedly hypometric, possibly due to disruption of a functionally specific oculomotor cortico-striatal loop via the caudate (Briand et al., 1999; Crawford, Henderson, & Kennard, 1989; Hodgson et al., 1999; Middleton & Strick, 2000). Similar abnormalities in movement kinematics have been noted for skeletomotor movements when responding under open loop conditions (Alberts, Saling, Adler, & Stelmach, 2000; Jackson, Jackson, Harrison, Henderson, & Kennard, 1995; Ketcham, Hodgson, Kennard, & Stelmach, 2003; Rand & Stelmach, 2000; Swinnen, Steyvers, VanDenBergh, & Stelmach, 2000). A general theory of striatal function which is consistent with these findings is that the caudate nucleus mediates “cognitive-motor” as opposed to sensori-motor transformations when actions have to be generated on the basis of an internally represented goal (Ketcham, Hodgson, Kennard, & Stelmach, 2003; Levy, Friedman, Davachi, & Goldman-Rakic, 1997; Postle, & D'Esposito, 1999).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text