Trends in Biotechnology
Volume 19, Issue 10, 1 October 2001, Pages S10-S16
Journal home page for Trends in Biotechnology

Review
Current trends in differential expression proteomics: isotopically coded tags

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7799(01)01793-0Get rights and content

Abstract

Isotopically coded tag methodology holds significant promise for differential expression proteomic experiments. This methodology has the potential for high sensitivity, high coverage, and high throughput. Although significant technical advances have been made in the past year, this approach must be viewed as an emerging technique. Advances in sample fractionation, both at the protein and peptide level, and improved data acquisition schemes, will all be required before the full potential of the method is realized.

Section snippets

Differential expression proteomics and protein separations

Since Anderson's visionary proposal for the creation of the Human Protein Index in 1982 (Ref. 1), differential protein expression has become almost synonymous with 2D gel electrophoresis. As a method for the separation of intact proteins, 2D gels have no rivals, offering unparalleled separation efficiencies. The basis for this extremely high separation efficiency is its comprehensive multidimensional coupling of two different separation systems (isoelectric focusing and polyacrylamide gel

Isotope coded affinity tags

In 1999, Gygi et al. reported on an exciting new technology for differential expression proteomics – isotope coded affinity tags (ICAT) 5. This approach, from the laboratory of Ruedi Aebersold, uses a protein tag with three functional moieties – a cysteine reactive moiety, a linker with either eight hydrogens or eight deuteriums (giving an isotope code or mass tag of 8 Da), and a biotin moiety (the affinity tag). In this experiment (Fig. 1), the cysteine side chains in complex mixtures of

Challenges and opportunities with ICAT

Although the initial report demonstrated the utility of the ICAT approach, several challenges were also apparent. The first of these challenges relates to the cysteine labeling. Because the technique is based on labeling the cysteine residue(s) of a protein, proteins that do not contain a cysteine will not be detected with ICAT. In the yeast proteome, 8% of the proteins do not contain a cysteine. In other species, the percentage of proteins lacking a cysteine can be as high as 20% of the total

Sample fractionation schemes

Sample fractionation for ICAT will be best accomplished at both the protein level and the peptide level. Fractionation at the peptide level is the most straightforward approach for two reasons. First, there is a variety of well-established techniques for peptide fractionation for use with MS analysis. Second, as labeling of the peptides with the ICAT reagent will occur before this fractionation, the effects of losses from the fractionation step are minimized because the relative expression

Data acquisition schemes

Further enhancement of ICAT analysis will be made through the use of improved data acquisition schemes. All work published to date collects MS–MS data from peptides regardless of their differential expression levels. Assuming less than 10% of the proteins in any experiment are actually differentially expressed, such a data acquisition scheme spends 90% of the time acquiring data from non-biologically relevant proteins (non-differentially expressed proteins). The concept of differentially

Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization

To date, most ICAT experiments have used electrospray ionization interfaces (ESI) online with nanoscale capillary LC systems. An alternate interface that presents significant advantages to ICAT experiments is matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI). Both ESI and MALDI are commonly used with a variety of tandem mass spectrometers for qualitative proteomic experiments. The initial report on the use of a MALDI–Q-TOF (quadrupole time-of-flight) mass spectrometer for ICAT experiments was

Concluding remarks

ICAT must be viewed as an emerging technique for differential expression proteomics, and its true utility has yet to be fully evaluated. Advances in sample fractionation at the protein level, sample fractionation at the peptide level, and improved data acquisition schemes, will all be required for the full potential of ICAT to be realized. ICAT offers several advantages over 2D gels, but it also has many disadvantages. ICAT is amenable for the analysis of several classes of proteins that are

References (27)

  • J.C. Giddings

    Concepts and comparisons in multidimensional separation

    J. High Resolut. Chromatogr. Chromatogr. Commun.

    (1987)
  • G.J. Opiteck

    Two-dimensional microcolumn HPLC coupled to a single-quadrupole mass spectrometer for the elucidation of sequence tags and peptide mapping

    J. Microcolumn Sep.

    (1998)
  • D.R. Goodlett

    Strategies and methods for proteome analysis

  • Cited by (78)

    • The Use of Proteomics in the Study of Molecular Responses and Toxicity Pathways in Biological Systems

      2011, Advances in Molecular Toxicology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Indeed, many proteomic studies have not been targeted to probe possible alterations of any particular function or molecular process in the biological system of interest. Thus, comparisons of protein profiles between samples from control and toxin-exposed living systems often represent a general feature of proteomic studies, an experimental setting that is termed “differential expression proteomics” [9,15,16]. By this term, it is then intended that analyses of proteomes are aimed at identification of qualitative and quantitative changes in the levels of proteins associated with distinct conditions of a biological system, independently of the fact that they might result from normal and/or pathological functioning, or else as a consequence of exogenous or endogenous perturbations of the system.

    • Leveraging protein purification strategies in proteomics

      2007, Journal of Chromatography B: Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical and Life Sciences
    • Functional Genomics of Wine Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

      2007, Advances in Food and Nutrition Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      These technologies are not as robust as transcript profiling since proteins are far more heterogeneous than RNA. Currently, it is not possible to know with any degree of certainty that all proteins are being visualized and that relative ratios of proteins in the cytoplasm are being maintained through sample preparation and protein separation (Gygi et al., 1999a,b, 2000; Moseley, 2001; Peng et al., 2003; Ravichandran and Sriram, 2005). However, as with proteomics, some important observations have been made using subsets of components that could be accurately quantified.

    • Endogenous transforming growth factor-β receptor-mediated Smad signaling complexes analyzed by mass spectrometry

      2006, Molecular and Cellular Proteomics
      Citation Excerpt :

      In LC-MALDI MS TOF/TOF, more ribosome proteins were identified. The differences in identified protein numbers and types represent the differences in which the three analytical methods take advantage of the different properties of the peptides and their product ions (40). To verify interactions of Smad2 protein with its partners, co-immunoprecipitation and Western blot were used.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text