Beyond the single study: function/location metanalysis in cognitive neuroimaging

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4388(98)80138-4Get rights and content

Abstract

Cognitive neuroimaging maps the brain locations of mental operations. This process is iterative, as no single study can fully characterize a mental operation or its brain location. This iterative discovery process, in combination with the location-reporting standard (i.e. spatial coordinates) of the cognitive neuroimaging community, has engendered a new form of metanalysis. Response locations from multiple studies have been analyzed collectively so as to better describe the spatial distribution of brain activations, with promising results. New hypotheses regarding elementary mental operations and their respective brain locations are being generated and refined via metanalysis. These hypotheses are being tested and confirmed by subsequent, prospective experiments. Function/location metanalysis is an important new tool for hypothesis generation in cognitive neuroimaging. This form of metanalysis is fundamentally different from the effect-size metanalyses prevalent in other literatures, with unique advantages and challenges.

References (39)

  • DL Collins et al.

    Automatic 3-D model-based neuroanatomical segmentation

    Hum Brain Mapp

    (1995)
  • JK Friston et al.

    Spatial registration and normalization of images

    Hum Brain Mapp

    (1995)
  • K Pearson

    Report on certain enteric fever inoculation statistics

    Br Med J

    (1904)
  • RJ Simes

    Publication bias: the case for an international registry of clinical trials

    J Clin Oncol

    (1986)
  • I Olkin

    A critical look at some population meta-analytic methods

    Am J Epidemiol

    (1994)
  • P Nony et al.

    Critical reading of the meta-analysis of clinical trials

    Therapie

    (1995)
  • DR Jones

    Meta-analysis: weighing the evidence

    Stat Med

    (1995)
  • HS Sacks et al.

    Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials

    N Eng J Med

    (1997)
  • HO Conn

    Interpretation of data from multiple trials: a critical review

    J Int Med

    (1997)
  • Cited by (110)

    • Localised grey matter atrophy in multiple sclerosis is network-based: a coordinate-based meta-analysis

      2019, Clinical Radiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The most common source of bias within individual studies was small sample size, which is corrected for in the ALE algorithm.31 Failure to report negative findings (file-drawer effect) is a form of publication bias that is problematic for meta-analytic computations of effect size but inconsequential for CBMA, which compute cross-study convergence.32 False-positive effects, on the other hand, are a serious problem for functional neuroimaging, for which CBMA offers a robust solution.33,34

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text