Elsevier

Brain and Cognition

Volume 82, Issue 2, July 2013, Pages 171-180
Brain and Cognition

Differential brain shrinkage over 6 months shows limited association with cognitive practice

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2013.04.002Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Healthy young and older adults had MRI scans 6 month apart.

  • The experimental group underwent 100 days of cognitive practice.

  • Prefrontal, hippocampus, caudate, cerebellum shrunk; calcarine, orbital did not.

  • In older participants, hypertension exacerbated cerebellar shrinkage.

  • In experimental group, cerebellar shrinkage was lesser than in controls.

Abstract

The brain shrinks with age, but the timing of this process and the extent of its malleability are unclear. We measured changes in regional brain volumes in younger (age 20–31) and older (age 65–80) adults twice over a 6 months period, and examined the association between changes in volume, history of hypertension, and cognitive training. Between two MRI scans, 49 participants underwent intensive practice in three cognitive domains for 100 consecutive days, whereas 23 control group members performed no laboratory cognitive tasks. Regional volumes of seven brain structures were measured manually and adjusted for intracranial volume. We observed significant mean shrinkage in the lateral prefrontal cortex, the hippocampus, the caudate nucleus, and the cerebellum, but no reliable mean change of the prefrontal white matter, orbital-frontal cortex, and the primary visual cortex. Individual differences in change were reliable in all regions. History of hypertension was associated with greater cerebellar shrinkage. The cerebellum was the only region in which significantly reduced shrinkage was apparent in the experimental group after completion of cognitive training. Thus, in healthy adults, differential brain shrinkage can be observed in a narrow time window, vascular risk may aggravate it, and intensive cognitive activity may have a limited effect on it.

Introduction

Aging is accompanied by profound changes in brain structure and function, but the pace of change varies significantly across brain regions and is characterized by substantial individual differences (for reviews see Kemper, 1994, Hedden and Gabrieli, 2004; Raz & Rodrigue, 2006). Reliable volume reduction in multiple cortical, subcortical, and cerebellar regions as well as thinning of the cerebral cortex have been observed in vivo in many samples, with various analytical tools, and on different imaging platforms (Fjell et al., 2009, Pfefferbaum et al., 1998, Raz et al., 2010, Raz et al., 2003a, Raz et al., 2003b, Raz et al., 2004, Raz et al., 2005, Resnick et al., 2003, Scahill et al., 2003). In healthy individuals, regional changes in brain volume have been detected within time spans from five (Driscoll et al., 2009, Pfefferbaum et al., 1998, Raz et al., 2005, Rusinek et al., 2003) to less than two (Fjell et al., 2009, Raz et al., 2010) years to 6 months (Murphy et al., 2010), and in the hippocampus, reliable shrinkage was noted within a span of 4 months (Lövdén et al., 2012). However, the localization and extent of regional change vary across studies and even across different samples studied in the same laboratory (e.g., Raz et al., 2005 vs. Raz et al., 2010). Moreover, the samples in which the changes were observed cover different parts of the adult age span and vary in the mean age by more than two decades (e.g., from 52 years in Raz et al., 2005 to 76 years in Murphy et al., 2010). Notably, changes in brain structure are not limited to older adulthood. Shrinkage of at least some brain regions (e.g., HC) has been observed in younger adults (Delisi et al., 1997, Lövdén M et al., 2012, Raz et al., 2005, Scahill et al., 2003), although not at the same rate as noted after the sixth decade of life (Raz et al., 2005).

Age-related shrinkage of the brain is not benign, and persons who evidence significant reduction in local brain volumes display reduced cognitive performance (Rodrigue and Raz, 2004; Raz et al., 2008) and run increased risk of developing dementia (Murphy et al., 2010). Because brain shrinkage and its effects on cognition vary substantially among individuals, it is important to determine the factors that affect the rate of decline. An example of such moderator of brain decline is arterial hypertension (Salerno et al., 1992, Strassburger et al., 1997), a common vascular risk factor that increases the rate and widens the spread of shrinkage across the brain (Raz et al., 2007, Raz et al., 2005, Raz et al., 2008).

Once age-related shrinkage of the brain is observed, it is only natural to ask what can be done about it. To date, several interventions aimed at slowing age-related brain change yielded mixed results. Whereas treating accelerators of brain aging, such as hypertension, does not slow the rate of decline (Jennings et al., 2012), other interventions such as aerobic exercise (Erickson et al., 2011) inspire cautious optimism regarding the malleability of the aging brain. One increasingly popular approach to combatting age-related brain shrinkage is perceptual-motor and cognitive training. Intensive practice on perceptual-motor and cognitive tasks of a wide range of complexity may result in significant enlargement of circumscribed brain regions and changes in white matter diffusion properties in young adults (Draganski et al., 2004, Mackey et al., 2012, Schmidt-Wilcke et al., 2010, Takeuchi et al., 2010, Draganski et al., 2006). Most important, older brains show practice-related improvements in gray matter volume (Boyke et al., 2008, Lövdén M et al., 2012) and regional white matter integrity (Lövdén, Bäckman, Lindenberger, Schaefer, & Schmiedek, 2010) as well, albeit not always and not to the same extent as the younger brains do (e.g., Wenger et al., 2012).

These findings suggest that intensive and systematic cognitive training may slow down the advancement of brain aging. However, even in younger adults the evidence of experience-induced change is far from overwhelming and significant methodological problems persist to dampen the enthusiasm about the findings. According to a recent review, 80% of extant studies of experience-dependent changes in brain structure relied on voxel-based morphometry (VBM) and a minority use other semi-automated approaches such as FreeSurfer (Thomas & Baker, 2012). Systematic comparisons between VBM and manual morphology (Allen, Bruss, Mehta, Grbowski, Brown & Damsio, 2008; Kennedy et al., 2009) provide ample basis for caution in interpreting differences between groups and conditions revealed by VBM. On the other hand, hypothesis-driven intervention studies with manual measurements are rare and thus far have been limited to investigation of one or two regions of interest (ROIs, e.g., Lövdén et al., 2012). In general, the hypothesis-free approach taken by the vast majority of the extant studies is problematic, especially when only small clusters of voxels that showed longitudinal change are compared between the training group and the controls (Thomas & Baker, 2012). Notably, among the extant studies of structural plasticity, only two (Lövdén M et al., 2012, Wenger et al., 2012), conducted on the same sample, compared practice-related changes in younger and older adults, and most have not evaluated the critically important group × time interaction (Thomas & Baker, 2012). In addition, with a couple of notable exceptions, intervention studies of structural change relied on small samples, with a median size of 38 and a range of 11–120 participants (Thomas & Baker, 2012, Table 1). In summary, Thomas and Baker (2012) concluded that in studies of experience-based change in brain structure, the effects are small, highly localized, poorly replicated, transient, and restricted to younger adults.

In this study, we addressed four questions, while trying to take into account threats to validity outlined by previous studies and summarized in Thomas and Baker (2012). First, we inquired whether differential age-related shrinkage in healthy young and old adults happens fast enough to be noticed within a 6-month time window. In pursuit of that objective, we selected regions that have been shown to change in relatively short periods (the prefrontal cortex, the hippocampus, the cerebellum, and the caudate nucleus) and a control region that evidenced no significant shrinkage in previous longitudinal studies – the primary visual cortex. Second, we examined if individuals reliably differ in their rates of brain shrinkage, even when observed over relatively short intervals. The third question was whether vascular risk moderates age-related declines in brain volume. Based on the reviewed evidence, we expected vascular risk to exacerbate shrinkage of the gray matter in the prefrontal cortex and the hippocampus. The fourth objective was to evaluate whether persons who undergo intensive cognitive intervention show lesser regional brain shrinkage than their counterparts who do not participate in the program. We addressed these questions by examining short-term changes in the regional brain volumes of healthy adults who participated in intensive training of multiple cognitive skills. We hypothesized that healthy adults, especially the older among them, would show significant shrinkage within 6 months at least in the brain regions with established vulnerability, such as the hippocampus, the prefrontal cortex, and the cerebellum. We expected to observe significant individual differences in the rate of change, and we hypothesized that persons with hypertension would show greater shrinkage than their normotensive peers would. Finally, we expected that the brains of people who underwent intensive cognitive practice would evidence lesser shrinkage than those of the control group participants. We expected to observe the benefits of practice in the regions with known associations to higher cognitive activities that are tapped by the cognitive tasks employed in this study: episodic memory, working memory and perceptual speed. Thus we selected the hippocampus, in which extensive training related to high memory load is believed to induce functional, metabolic and structural changes (Groussard et al., 2010, Maguire et al., 2000, Mårtensson J et al., 2012, Roche et al., 2009), the prefrontal cortex that showed changes after memory, attention and working memory training (Engvig et al., 2010, Hoekzema et al., 2011, Mårtensson J et al., 2012), and the cerebellum which evidenced structural growth after working memory training (Hoekzema et al., 2011).

Section snippets

Participants

The participants were paid volunteers, residents of Berlin, Germany, who responded to advertisement in newspapers, word-of-mouth recommendations, and fliers that invited them to join a study on the effects of intensive cognitive training on brain and behavior (the COGITO study; see Schmiedek, Lövdén, & Lindenberger, 2010, for details). The main study involved 101 younger (aged 20–31 years) and 103 older adults (aged 65–80 years). These individuals took part in an intensive 100-days program of

Latent difference scores models

Table 1 summarizes the univariate LDS models for change in regional cerebral volumes between the baseline assessment and the follow-up. The results of these analyses indicate that the mean volumes of four out of seven examined regions shrunk within less than 6 months. Significant mean shrinkage occurred in the hippocampus, the lateral prefrontal cortex, the caudate nucleus, and the cerebellum. Notably, all seven measured ROIs evidenced significant variance in change, including those that showed

Regional brain shrinkage – How fast?

The results of this study show that significant shrinkage of selected brain structures occurs in healthy adults within less than 6 months. We observed mean volume changes in four out of seven examined brain regions. The pace of change in these regions was equivalent to 1.4–2.5% per annum, with the lateral prefrontal cortex exhibiting the fastest rate of shrinkage. These shrinkage rates are greater than the ones reported in a 5-year longitudinal study (Raz et al., 2005) but smaller than those

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by the Max Planck Society grant from the Innovation Fund, the German Federal Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF), the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, the Sofja Kovalevskaja Award administered by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (to ML), and by the grant R37 AG-011230 from the National Institute on Aging, USA (to NR).

References (88)

  • E. Farkas et al.

    Cerebral microvascular pathology in aging and Alzheimer’s disease

    Progress in Neurobiology

    (2001)
  • J.A. Kleim et al.

    Motor learning induces astrocytic hypertrophy in the cerebellar cortex

    Behavioural Brain Research

    (2007)
  • R.K. Lenroot et al.

    Brain development in children and adolescents: insights from anatomical magnetic resonance imaging

    Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews

    (2006)
  • M. Lövdén et al.

    Experience-dependent plasticity of white-matter microstructure extends into old age

    Neuropsychologia

    (2010)
  • M. Lövdén et al.

    Spatial navigation training protects the hippocampus against age-related changes during early and late adulthood

    Neurobiology of Aging

    (2012)
  • J. Mårtensson et al.

    Growth of language-related brain areas after foreign language learning

    NeuroImage

    (2012)
  • A. May

    Experience-dependent structural plasticity in the adult human brain

    TICS

    (2011)
  • F. Mora et al.

    Aging, plasticity and environmental enrichment: Structural changes and neurotransmitter dynamics in several areas of the brain

    Brain Research Reviews

    (2007)
  • E.A. Murphy et al.

    Six-month atrophy in MTL structures is associated with subsequent memory decline in elderly controls

    NeuroImage

    (2010)
  • N. Raz et al.

    Differential aging of the brain: Patterns, cognitive correlates and modifiers

    Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews

    (2006)
  • N. Raz et al.

    Differential age-related changes in the regional metencephalic volumes in humans: A five-year follow-up

    Neuroscience Letters

    (2003)
  • N. Raz et al.

    Aging, sexual dimorphism, and hemispheric asymmetry of the cerebral cortex: Replicability of regional differences in volume

    Neurobiology of Aging

    (2004)
  • N. Raz et al.

    Trajectories of brain aging in middle-aged and older adults: Regional and individual differences

    NeuroImage

    (2010)
  • D.R. Riddle et al.

    Microvascular plasticity in aging

    Ageing Research Reviews

    (2003)
  • Y. Sagi et al.

    Learning in the fast lane: New insights into neuroplasticity

    Neuron

    (2012)
  • T. Schmidt-Wilcke et al.

    Distinct patterns of functional and structural neuroplasticity associated with learning Morse code

    Neuroimage

    (2010)
  • E. Wenger et al.

    Cortical thickness changes following spatial navigation training in adulthood and aging

    NeuroImage

    (2012)
  • B.B. Andersen et al.

    Aging of the human cerebellum: A stereological study

    Journal of Comparative Neurology

    (2003)
  • J.H. Balsters et al.

    Cerebellar plasticity and the automation of first-order rules

    Journal of Neuroscience

    (2011)
  • J.E. Black et al.

    Learning causes synaptogenesis, whereas motor activity causes angiogenesis, in cerebellar cortex of adult rats

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

    (1990)
  • M. Bobinski et al.

    The histological validation of post mortem magnetic resonance imaging-determined hippocampal volume in Alzheimer’s disease

    Neuroscience

    (2000)
  • M.I. Botez et al.

    Role of the cerebellum in complex human behavior

    Italian Journal of Neurological Sciences

    (1989)
  • J. Boyke et al.

    Training-induced brain structure changes in the elderly

    Journal of Neuroscience

    (2008)
  • R. Cabeza et al.

    Imaging cognition II: An empirical review of 275 PET and fMRI studies

    Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

    (2000)
  • N. Cherbuin et al.

    In vivo hippocampal measurement and memory: A comparison of manual tracing and automated segmentation in a large community-based sample

    PLoS ONE

    (2009)
  • E. Courchesne et al.

    Normal brain development and aging: Quantitative analysis at in vivo MR imaging in healthy volunteers

    Radiology

    (2000)
  • C.M. de Frias et al.

    Cholesterol and triglycerides moderate the effect of apolipoprotein E on memory functioning in older adults

    Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences

    (2007)
  • A. Diamond

    Close interrelation of motor development and cognitive development and of the cerebellum and prefrontal cortex

    Child Development

    (2000)
  • B. Draganski et al.

    Neuroplasticity: Changes in the gray matter introduced by training

    Nature

    (2004)
  • B. Draganski et al.

    Temporal and spatial dynamics of brain structure changes during extensive learning

    Journal of Neuroscience

    (2006)
  • J. Driemeyer et al.

    Changes in gray matter induced by learning-revisited

    PLoS ONE

    (2008)
  • I. Driscoll et al.

    Longitudinal pattern of regional brain volume change differentiates normal aging from MCI

    Neurology

    (2009)
  • T. Duning et al.

    Dehydration confounds the assessment of brain atrophy

    Neurology

    (2005)
  • M.A. Eckert et al.

    Age-related changes in processing speed: unique contributions of cerebellar and prefrontal cortex

    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

    (2010)
  • Cited by (35)

    • Don't forget the little brain: A framework for incorporating the cerebellum into the understanding of cognitive aging

      2022, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      Since this publication, additional evidence supporting age differences in regional cerebellar volume has emerged, and it further supports findings suggesting that regional cerebellar volume is associated with behavioral performance (Koppelmans et al., 2015, 2017) Further, recent work from Han and colleagues (Han et al., 2020) has advanced our understanding of regional cerebellar volume in aging by demonstrating longitudinal changes in volume over time. While earlier work had demonstrated changes in cerebellar volume in aging, this was done at a more gross anatomical level (Raz et al., 2005, 2013). This new investigation looks at the lobular level and has provided a more nuanced understanding of changes in the cerebellum in advanced age (Han et al., 2020).

    • Cerebellum-aging of the neuronal machine

      2021, Factors Affecting Neurological Aging: Genetics, Neurology, Behavior, and Diet
    • Longitudinal analysis of regional cerebellum volumes during normal aging

      2020, NeuroImage
      Citation Excerpt :

      This algorithm resulted in 28 cerebellar regions: bilateral Lobules I–III, IV, V, and VI; Crus I and II; Lobules VIIB, VIIIA, VIIIB, IX, and X; Vermis VI, VII, VIII, IX, and X; and Corpus Medullare (CM). Since some previous methods report statistical analysis of coarser levels of cerebellar divisions (Luft et al., 1999; Raz et al., 2013; Koppelmans et al., 2017), we also provide results of anatomically meaningful grouped regions (Schmahmann et al., 2000) in addition to subcomponents, so as to facilitate more direct comparisons among the literature. Following Schmahmann et al. (2000), these regions were grouped into bilateral Anterior, Posterior, and Flocculonodular Lobes, Vermis VI–VII, VIII–IX, and X, and further into bilateral hemispheres, the whole Vermis, and the whole cerebellum.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text