Elsevier

Brain Stimulation

Volume 5, Issue 4, October 2012, Pages 653-655
Brain Stimulation

Letter to the Editor
A neuromodulation experience registry for deep brain stimulation studies in psychiatric research: Rationale and recommendations for implementation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2011.10.003Get rights and content

Section snippets

Utility of a neuromodulation experience registry

The key arguments supporting implementation of a specific NER are mainly centered on patient safety and trial efficacy, yet they also serve many additional goals such as serving as a platform for data aggregation, regulatory oversight, and dissemination of innovative techniques (Box 1).

For example, meta-analysis of pooled aggregate data from multiple small trials linked in a registry may demonstrate heretofore unrecognized efficacy in a field marked by single case reports and small cohort

Conclusion

Although establishment of a NER faces many challenges and is an idea that needs to be refined, it is an idea whose time has come. In the light of the cautionary history of psychosurgery and the complexity of psychiatric disease, the establishment of a NER is one of the most instrumental steps the field can take right now.

References (9)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (18)

  • Parkinsonism in neurodegenerative diseases predominantly presenting with ataxia

    2019, International Review of Neurobiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    However, at this stage, evidence is too weak that DBS should be considered as a standard therapy in SCAs, given the lack of larger case series, let alone well-controlled DBS trials in SCAs. To aggregate a first evidence basis whether DBS is indeed effective in SCAs with predominant parkinsonian phenotypes - also on the long-term -, the experiences from currently existing single SCA cases with DBS (knowing or not knowing that the parkinsonism phenotype had been caused by a SCA mutation) should be collected in a meta-analysis or even better in a shared registry (Synofzik, Fins, & Schlaepfer, 2012; Synofzik & Schlaepfer, 2011). Such a systematic collective aggregation and analysis of single cases from widespread centers across the world in a standardized DBS case registry, including unpublished DBS experiences, will allow to establish more systematic evidence before larger trials and clinical routine use of DBS in SCAs are further pursued (Synofzik, Fins, et al., 2012; Synofzik & Schlaepfer, 2011).

  • The future of psychiatry: brain devices

    2017, Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental
    Citation Excerpt :

    Most had trouble recognizing themselves after surgery, and six of the twenty-nine experienced these issues noting, for instance, “I feel like a robot,” and, “I don't feel like myself anymore” [35]. Regarding normalcy, Synofzik and colleagues describe a patient with a DBS system for anxiety and OCD that, after calibration sessions, reported feeling “unrealistically good” and “overwhelmed” by sensations of happiness and ease, and asked to have the stimuli reduced [36]. Implanted brain devices, designed to interface with existing nervous tissue in closed-loop systems, add complexity to how we think about our identities, changing not only our body schema, but our social identities as well.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text