Dopaminergic control of the striatum for high-level cognition

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2011.04.002Get rights and content

Dopamine has long been implicated in a wide variety of high-level cognitive processes, ranging from working memory to rule learning and attention switching. Notable progress has been made in the past decades, but the mechanisms underlying effects of dopamine on high-level cognition remain unclear. This article reviews evidence for an important role of the striatum and its interaction with the prefrontal cortex and suggests a variety of ways by which changes in dopamine transmission can bias high-level cognition.

Highlights

► Effects of dopamine go beyond modulation of model-free, habit learning. ► Dopamine also modulates high-level cognitive function. ► Multiple fronto-striatal mechanisms are proposed to mediate high-level cognitive effects of dopamine.

Introduction

Dopamine has long been implicated in behavioral control. Particularly well known are its contributions to reward learning [1, 2••, 3, 4]. More specifically, dopamine has been associated with a class of learning that, in the instrumental domain, echoes Thorndike's habit learning of automatized responses through reinforcement. This form of dopamine-dependent habit learning is thought to be regulated by a model-free system that has been associated with the dorsolateral parts of the striatum. It is defined based on its insensitivity to changes in outcome value and instrumental contingency and is often contrasted with a form of goal-directed behavior that is regulated by a model-based system [5, 6]. Unlike habitual behavior, which is hardwired by reinforcement and directly based on experience, goal-directed behavior involves flexible, forward planning using internal representations (models) of the environment [7] and is directly sensitive to changes in outcome value and contingency [8]. While signals associated with model-based, goal-directed control have been found throughout the brain, including the prefrontal cortex, hippocampus, and dorsomedial striatum [9, 10••, 11, 12••, 13, 14], current formal theories of reinforcement learning offer no obvious role for dopamine in model-based control [5, 15, 16].

This conceptualization of dopamine as serving exclusively model-free behavior is apparently at odds with empirical evidence demonstrating effects of dopamine on high-level cognitive control processes, such as working memory, complex rule learning and attention switching [17, 18••, 19, 20, 21]. Indeed high-level cognitive deficits are core to many dopamine-related disorders, such as addiction [22] and Parkinson's disease (PD) [23]. Performance on tasks that typically involve model-based forward planning, such as the one-touch Tower of London and self-ordered spatial search tests, is sensitive to dopamine manipulation in PD patients [24], healthy volunteers [25], and nonhuman primates [26].

Furthermore, certain effects of dopaminergic drugs on tasks of learning are difficult to account for by modulation of a model-free, habitual system, and rather seem to involve behavior that depends on explicit models of the environment [19, 20, 27]. For example, Cools et al. [28••] have shown effects of dopamine receptor stimulation and dopamine synthesis capacity on a deterministic form of one-trial reward and punishment prediction learning. Although it is tempting to interpret these effects in relation to the standard framework of model-free reinforcement learning, performance on the task probably does not involve any model-free control, but rather depends on the ability to update explicit ‘cognitive’ predictions of future reward or punishment.

In addition, the body of neurophysiological work that originally inspired the hypothesis that dopamine is involved in model-free, habit learning has recently been extended with new data showing that even the midbrain dopamine neurons themselves encode signals that could support model-based, goal-direct control [29, 30]. For example, Bromberg-Martin and Hikosaka [29] have shown that midbrain dopamine neurons that encode reward expectation also encode information expectation, suggesting that dopamine plays a role not just in reward seeking but also in information seeking.

These different lines of evidence suggest that effects of dopamine go beyond the modulation of model-free, habitual behavior [31], and extend to high-level cognitive processes. In this review, a variety of mechanisms will be addressed by which high-level effects of dopamine may arise. Two factors should be kept in mind. First, midbrain dopamine neurons are known to project to brain regions associated with model-based control, for example, the prefrontal cortex, the dorsomedial striatum and the hippocampus. Second, although there might be separate model-free and model-based systems for behavioral control [5], these systems are unlikely to act in isolation. In particular, the prefrontal cortex is well known to interact with the striatum in part-segregated, part-interactive fronto-striatal circuits [32, 33, 34]. Accordingly, dopamine might affect high-level cognitive function by altering flow through these circuits. Various instantiations of such fronto-striatal circuit effects are discussed.

Section snippets

Direct dopaminergic control of high-level cognitive function

Dopamine neurons project not only to the dorsolateral striatum, associated with model-free behavior, but also to regions implicated in model-based, goal-directed behavior. Accordingly, dopamine probably modulates high-level cognition by acting directly in these brain regions (Figure 1a). For example, dopamine receptor stimulation in the prefrontal cortex contributes to goal-directed behavior by modulating the persistent, short-term memory of goal-relevant representations, perhaps via

Dopaminergic control of high-level cognition via the striatum

In addition to affecting high-level cognition by modulating model-based systems directly, dopamine affects cognition indirectly via modulating processing in the dorsolateral striatum, thus altering flow through dorsolateral fronto-striatal circuitry (Figure 1b). Empirical evidence for the hypothesis that dopamine in the striatum can affect prefrontal function comes from genetic and neurochemical imaging work, revealing that variation in striatal dopamine function is associated with altered

Dopaminergic control of top-down influences on striatal function

A third mechanism by which dopamine might affect high-level cognition is by altering top-down influences of the prefrontal cortex on striatal processing (Figure 1c). For example, instructed rules can exert powerful control over learning-based choice, so that subjects follow the instructed rule rather than experience [53] and such effects are accompanied by modulation of striatal activity [54, 55]. Computational modelling work has indicated that this top-down bias might well reflect an effect of

Dopaminergic control of interactions between distinct fronto-striatal circuits

A fourth mechanism by which dopamine in the striatum could affect high-level, model-based cognitive control is by altering hierarchical interactions between distinct cortical systems that converge in the striatum (Figure 1d). A role for striatal dopamine in mediating hierarchical interactions between distinct fronto-striatal circuits is plausible given the arrangement of spiraling connections between the midbrain and the striatum; this arrangement is perfectly suited to subserve a mechanism by

Conclusion

Effects of dopamine in the striatum go beyond the modulation of model-free, habitual behavior, and extend to high-level cognitive processes, including working memory, abstract rule learning and high-level attention switching. This review highlights multiple mechanisms underlying such cognitive effects. Dopamine may alter high-level cognition by acting directly on model-based structures, such as the prefrontal cortex or the hippocampus, or by indirect modulation of striatum-gated input or output

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • • of special interest

  • •• of outstanding interest

Acknowledgements

The author is supported by a VIDI research grant from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research, a Human Frontiers Science Program Grant RGP0036/2009-C, and a fellowship from the Netherlands Brain Foundation. I thank Hanneke den Ouden and Martine van Schouwenburg for their contribution to the manuscript.

References (73)

  • S.H. Wang et al.

    Relevance of synaptic tagging and capture to the persistence of long-term potentiation and everyday spatial memory

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

    (2010)
  • B. Lex et al.

    The role of dopamine in the prelimbic cortex and the dorsomedial striatum in instrumental conditioning

    Cereb Cortex

    (2010)
  • P. Marklund et al.

    Temporal dynamics of basal ganglia under-recruitment in Parkinson's disease: transient caudate abnormalities during updating of working memory

    Brain

    (2009)
  • H. den Ouden et al.

    Striatal prediction error modulates cortical coupling

    J Neurosci

    (2010)
  • M.R. Delgado et al.

    Regulating the expectation of reward via cognitive strategies

    Nat Neurosci

    (2008)
  • P. Montague et al.

    A framework for mesencephalic dopamine systems based on predictive Hebbian learning

    J Neurosci

    (1996)
  • E. Koechlin et al.

    The architecture of cognitive control in the human prefrontal cortex

    Science

    (2003)
  • T.V. Maia et al.

    From reinforcement learning models to psychiatric and neurological disorders

    Nat Neurosci

    (2011)
  • S.B. Flagel et al.

    A selective role for dopamine in stimulus-reward learning

    Nature

    (2011)
  • Frank M: Computational models of motivated action selection in corticostriatal circuits. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2011, this...
  • A. Dagher et al.

    Personality, addiction, dopamine: insights from Parkinson's disease

    Neuron

    (2009)
  • A. Dickinson

    Actions and habits – the development of behavioral autonomy

    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B - Biol Sci

    (1985)
  • Bornstein A, Daw N: Multiplicity of control in the basal ganglia: computational roles of striatal subregions. Curr Opin...
  • H. Yin et al.

    Reward-guided learning beyond dopamine in the nucleus accumbens: the integrative functions of cortico-basal ganglia networks

    Eur J Neurosci

    (2008)
  • V.V. Valentin et al.

    Determining the neural substrates of goal-directed learning in the human brain

    J Neurosci

    (2007)
  • J. Gläscher et al.

    States versus rewards: dissociable neural prediction error signals underlying model-based and model-free reinforcement learning

    Neuron

    (2011)
  • A.N. Hampton et al.

    The role of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex in abstract state-based inference during decision making in humans

    J Neurosci

    (2006)
  • N. Daw et al.

    Model-based influences on human choices and striatal prediction errors

    Neuron

    (2011)
  • A.S. Gupta et al.

    Hippocampal replay is not a simple function of experience

    Neuron

    (2010)
  • P. Dayan

    Dopamine, reinforcement learning, and addiction

    Pharmacopsychiatry

    (2009)
  • Cools R, D’Esposito M: Inverted-U Shaped dopamine actions on human working memory and cognitive control. Biol Psychiatr...
  • P.L. Clatworthy et al.

    Dopamine release in dissociable striatal subregions predicts the different effects of oral methylphenidate on reversal learning and spatial working memory

    J Neurosci

    (2009)
  • S. Lewis et al.

    Dopaminergic basis for deficits in working memory but not attentional set-shifting in Parkinson's disease

    Neuropsychologia

    (2005)
  • C.M. Dodds et al.

    The dopamine D2 receptor antagonist sulpiride modulates striatal BOLD signal during the manipulation of information in working memory

    Psychopharmacology (Berl)

    (2009)
  • J.W. Dalley et al.

    Impulsivity, compulsivity, and top-down cognitive control

    Neuron

    (2011)
  • M.A. Mehta et al.

    The effects of acute tyrosine and phenylalanine depletion on spatial working memory and planning in healthy volunteers are predicted by changes in striatal dopamine levels

    Psychopharmacology (Berl)

    (2005)
  • Cited by (150)

    • Chronic cannabis use alters dACC-striatal glutamatergic balance

      2023, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text