The diagnostic pathway and prognosis in bulbar-onset amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2010.03.028Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Despite the inevitability of disease progression in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, there is a high degree of prognostic heterogeneity in all subtypes. Some bulbar-onset (BO) patients may develop rapid anarthria yet remain ambulant for a prolonged period, whereas others progress rapidly, with early generalisation of motor weakness to the limbs and respiratory muscles. Diagnostic delay is a common occurrence in ALS, and many BO patients report having attended other specialist clinics prior to diagnosis.

Methods

A retrospective descriptive study of BO ALS patients seen in a tertiary clinic over a six year period.

Results

Forty-nine BO ALS patients were studied. Median survival from symptom onset was 27 months (range 6–84). 63% of subjects were female and the mean age at symptom onset was 68 years. Half had been referred to another speciality prior to diagnosis, either otolaryngology or stroke clinics, but this did not influence diagnostic latency or survival. Emotionality was reported in 45% of patients. Neurophysiological assessment was performed in 80%, brain imaging recorded in 69%, and antibody testing for myasthenia gravis in 22%. The median time to symptomatic progression beyond the bulbar region was approximately 1 year, with equal proportions progressing to the upper or lower limbs. The median interval from onset to anarthria was 18 months, and to loss of ambulation 22 months. There was a close correlation between the two (r2 = 0.6) and median survival from loss of ambulation was only 3 months. Gastrostomy was carried out in 78% of patients with a median time of 13 months from symptom onset, and 3 months from diagnosis. Median survival from gastrostomy was 10 months.

Conclusions

Survival in bulbar-onset ALS is highly variable. Half of the patients were referred to an inappropriate clinic prior to diagnosis. The time interval to the development of anarthria predicted the timing of subsequent loss of ambulation accurately from which survival may then be only a few months.

Introduction

Understanding the clinical heterogeneity inherent in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) remains an important challenge that might have some bearing on the disappointing results from clinical therapeutic trials for this degenerative disorder of cerebral and spinal motor neurons. Despite a median survival of 2–3 years from symptom onset in most clinic-based series, there is a skewed distribution with a significant number surviving beyond 10 years, a small minority of which also have bulbar-onset (BO) of their symptoms [1]. BO patients constitute up to 25% of most ALS clinic populations, and generally this phenotype is associated with more rapid progression [2]. It has been observed that older female patients are over-represented in BO patients [3], [4], [5], which links to the independent observation that the female:male ratio in ALS increases with each decade [5], [6], [7].

The insidious onset of symptoms in ALS, the lack of a diagnostic test, erroneous referral to other specialists [8], and even unnecessary surgery in some cases [9], are all factors involved in the consistent delay from symptom onset to formal diagnosis in ALS (frequently beyond 12 months [2]). This interval might represent a missed opportunity for a more effective therapeutic intervention. True ‘mimics’ of ALS are rare, possibly even more so for BO patients, who are observed to reach ALS clinics sooner after symptom onset than limb-onset patients [10], though this may simply reflect more rapid progression of symptoms. We have informally observed that BO patients are frequently referred to otolaryngology and stroke clinics prior to diagnosis in our tertiary centre, sometimes undergoing unnecessary investigations as a result.

Finally, we also recognise a group of patients, often female, who despite the relatively rapid development of anarthria, remain ambulant for months thereafter, and may derive proportionately a greater benefit from interventions such as enteral feeding.

In this retrospective analysis we sought to characterise the diagnostic pathway and aspects of clinical heterogeneity affecting survival in bulbar-onset ALS patients.

Section snippets

Methods

Patients with ALS seen at a tertiary referral centre since August 2003 were prospectively recorded in a database as part of routine clinical care. Since 2009 attendees have provided written informed consent for the use of anonymised clinical data for research and publication, and approval for the retrospective use of deceased patients (or those lost to follow up) was granted through application to the Ireland Health and Social Care Research Ethics Committee 2 (09/NIR02/35).

The diagnosis of ALS

Results

A total of 49 patients with bulbar-onset were identified from 262 sporadic ALS cases recorded in the database. The results are summarised in Table 1.

Discussion

This retrospective descriptive study of a group of bulbar-onset ALS patients confirms the long-recognised lower median survival overall, whilst specifically noting that nearly 10% of patients survived beyond 4 years from symptom onset (the upper limit of median survival in a review of prognostic factors in ALS [2]). We confirmed a higher proportion of females and higher mean age of symptom onset, and demonstrated that the development of anarthria is strongly predictive of the time to eventual

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the staff of the Oxford MND Care Centre (www.oxfordmnd.net), which receives funding from the MNDA, for their ongoing work in the care of ALS patients. MRT is supported by the MRC/MNDA Lady Edith Wolfson Clinician Scientist Fellowship.

References (16)

  • M. Kraemer et al.

    Diagnostic problems and delay of diagnosis in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    Clin Neurol Neurosurg

    (2010 Feb)
  • Y. Iwasaki et al.

    The diagnostic interval in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    Clin Neurol Neurosurg

    (2002)
  • A. Chen et al.

    Otolaryngologic presentations of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg

    (2005 Mar)
  • M.R. Turner et al.

    Prolonged survival in motor neuron disease: a descriptive study of the King's database 1990–2002

    J NeurolNeurosurgPsychiatry

    (2003)
  • A. Chio et al.

    Prognostic factors in ALS: a critical review

    Amyotroph Lateral Scler

    (Oct–Dec 2009)
  • T.M. Li et al.

    Clinical features and associations of 560 cases of motor neuron disease

    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry

    (1990)
  • P.B. Christensen et al.

    Survival of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in 2 Danish counties

    Neurology

    (1990)
  • L.J. Haverkamp et al.

    Natural history of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in a database population. Validation of a scoring system and a model for survival prediction

    Brain

    (1995)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (79)

  • Mapping of critical events in disease progression through binary classification: Application to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    2021, Journal of Biomedical Informatics
    Citation Excerpt :

    Though that patient may require a wheelchair due to additional severe arm weakness (and inability to thus use a walker or cane), neither King’s nor MiToS can detect the associated equipment need. In the literature, few studies have analyzed the timing of some critical ALS stages/events, e.g., complete functional impairment or needing wheelchair [13,14]; however, analyses for several other critical ALS events (see Table 1) are needed. To this end, Dalgıç et al. proposed the Tollgate-based ALS Staging System (TASS) for measuring ALS progression.

  • Time to diagnosis and factors affecting diagnostic delay in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    2020, Journal of the Neurological Sciences
    Citation Excerpt :

    Turner et al. reported 49% of ALS patients were referred to other specialists prior to a neurologist, with 54% of this group seen by otorhinolaryngologists. Nonetheless, these referrals did not result in significant diagnostic delay [16]. However, in a study by Househam and Swash, the 47.2% of ALS patients who were first referred to a neurologist experienced a delay of 10.2 months compared to 12.3 months for those referred to another specialty, such as otorhinolaryngology (12.3%), rheumatology (8.8%), orthopedic surgery (7%), physiotherapy (5.3%), and psychiatry (3.5%) [27].

  • Diagnostic delay in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    2023, European Journal of Neurology
View all citing articles on Scopus
1

These authors contributed equally to the manuscript.

View full text