Summary
Stroke is a common disorder that produces a major burden to society, largely through long-lasting motor disability in survivors. Recent studies have broadened our understanding of the processes underlying recovery of motor function after stroke. Bilateral motor regions of the brain experience substantial reorganization after stroke, including changes in the strength of interhemispheric inhibitory interactions. Our understanding of the extent to which different forms of reorganization contribute to behavioral gains in the rehabilitative process, although still limited, has led to the formulation of novel interventional strategies to regain motor function. Transcranial magnetic (TMS) and DC (tDCS) electrical stimulation are noninvasive brain stimulation techniques that modulate cortical excitability in both healthy individuals and stroke patients. These techniques can enhance the effect of training on performance of various motor tasks, including those that mimic activities of daily living. This review looks at the effects of TMS and tDCS on motor cortical function and motor performance in healthy volunteers and in patients with stroke. Both techniques can either enhance or suppress cortical excitability, and may move to the clinical arena as strategies to enhance the beneficial effects of customarily used neurorehabilitative treatments after stroke.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Heart Association Writing Group for the Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics: 2005 update. Dallas, Texas: AHA, 2005.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevalence of disabilities and associated health conditions among adults: United States, 1999. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2001;50: 120–5. [Erratum in: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2001;50:149]
Kavanagh S, Knapp M, Patel A. Costs and disability among stroke patients. J Public Health Med 1999;21: 385–394.
Wade DT, Langton-Hewer R, Wood VA, Skilbeck CE, Ismail HM. The hemiplegic arm after stroke: measurement and recovery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1983;46: 521–524.
Sunderland A, Tinson D, Bradley L, Hewer RL. Arm function after stroke: an evaluation of grip strength as a measure of recovery and a prognostic indicator. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1989;52: 1267–1272.
Demaerschalk BM, Yip TR. Economic benefit of increasing utilization of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke in the United States. Stroke 2005;36: 2500–2503.
Duncan PW, Goldstein LB, Matchar D, Divine GW, Feussner J. Measurement of motor recovery after stroke: outcome assessment and sample size requirements. Stroke 1992;23: 1084–1089.
Barreca S, Wolf SL, Fasoli S, Bohannon R. Treatment interventions for the paretic upper limb of stroke survivors: a critical review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2003;17: 220–226.
Krakauer JW. Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurol 2006;19: 84–90.
Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 347–354.
Taub E, Uswatte G, Pidikiti R. Constraint-induced movement therapy: a new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation—a clinical review. J Rehabil Res Dev 1999;36: 237–251.
Taub E, Uswatte G, Elbert T. New treatments in neurorehabilitation founded on basic research. Nat Rev Neurosci 2002;3: 228–236.
Luft AR, McCombe-Waller S, Whitall J, et al. Repetitive bilateral arm training and motor cortex activation in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004;292: 1853–1861.
Whitall J, McCombe Waller S, Silver KH, Macko RF. Repetitive bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing improves motor function in chronic hemiparetic stroke. Stroke 2000;31: 2390–2395.
Dobkin B, Apple D, Barbeau H, et al. Weight-supported treadmill vs. over-ground training for walking after acute incomplete SCI. Neurology 2006;66: 484–493.
Dobkin B, Apple D, Barbeau H, et al. Methods for a randomized trial of weight-supported treadmill training versus conventional training for walking during inpatient rehabilitation after incomplete traumatic spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2003;17: 153–167.
Sullivan KJ, Knowlton BJ, Dobkin BH. Step training with body weight support: effect of treadmill speed and practice paradigms on poststroke locomotor recovery. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83: 683–691.
Hesse S, Schmidt H, Werner C, Bardeleben A. Upper and lower extremity robotic devices for rehabilitation and for studying motor control. Curr Opin Neurol 2003;16: 705–710.
Hesse S, Schulte-Tigges G, Konrad, M, Bardeleben A, Werne C. Robot-assisted arm trainer for the passive and active practice of bilateral forearm and wrist movements in hemiparetic subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84: 915–920.
Lum PS, Burgar CG, Shor PC, Majmundar M, van der Loos M. Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83: 952–959.
Patton JL, Stoykov ME, Kovic M, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Evaluation of robotic training forces that either enhance or reduce error in chronic hemiparetic stroke survivors. Exp Brain Res 2006;168: 368–383.
Stein J, Krebs HI, Frontera WR, Fasoli SE, Hughes R, Hogan N. Comparison of two techniques of robot-aided upper limb exercise training after stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2004;83: 720–728.
Volpe BT, Ferraro M, Lynch D, et al. Robotics and other devices in the treatment of patients recovering from stroke. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2005;5: 465–470.
Volpe BT, Krebs HI, Hogan N. Is robot-aided sensorimotor training in stroke rehabilitation a realistic option? Curr Opin Neurol 2001;14: 745–752.
Deutsch JE, Merians AS, Adamovich S, Poizner H, Burdea GC. Development and application of virtual reality technology to improve hand use and gait of individuals post-stroke. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2004;22: 371–386.
Fung J, Richards CL, Malouin F, McFadyen BJ, Lamontagne A. A treadmill and motion coupled virtual reality system for gait training post-stroke. Cyberpsychol Behav 2006;9: 157–162.
Holden MK. Virtual environments for motor rehabilitation: review. Cyberpsychol Behav 2005;8: 187–211; discussion 212–219.
Katz N, Ring H, Naveh Y, Kizony R, Feintuch U, Weiss PL. Interactive virtual environment training for safe street crossing of right hemisphere stroke patients with unilateral spatial neglect. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27: 1235–1243.
Kuttuva M, Boian R, Merians A, et al. The Rutgers Arm, a rehabilitation system in virtual reality: a pilot study. Cyberpsychol Behav 2006;9: 148–152.
Viau A, Feldman AG, McFadyen BJ, Levin MF. Reaching in reality and virtual reality: a comparison of movement kinematics in healthy subjects and in adults with hemiparesis. J Neuroengineering Rehabil [serial online] 2004;1: 11. Available at: http://www.jneuroengrehab.com/Access Date: December 14, 2004.
Ward NS, Cohen LG. Mechanisms underlying recovery of motor function after stroke. Arch Neurol 2004. 61: 1844–1848.
Calautti C, Baron J-C. Functional neuroimaging studies of motor recovery after stroke in adults: a review. Stroke 2003;34: 1553–1566.
Wall PD, Egger M. Formation of new connexions in adult rat brains after partial deafferentation. Nature 1971;232: 542–545.
Raisman G, Field PM. A quantitative investigation of the development of collateral reinnervation after partial deafferentation of the septal nuclei. Brain Res 1973;50: 241–264.
Chklovskii DB, Mel BW, Svoboda K. Cortical rewiring and information storage. Nature 2004;431: 782–788.
Bliss TV, Gardner-Medwin AR. Long-lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission in the dentate area of the unanaesthetized rabbit following stimulation of the perforant path. J Physiol 1973; 232: 357–374.
Bliss TV, Lomo T. Long-lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission in the dentate area of the anaesthetized rabbit following stimulation of the perforant path. J Physiol 1973;232: 331–356.
Byrnes ML, Thickbroom GW, Phillips BA, Mastaglia FL. Longterm changes in motor cortical organization after recovery from subcortical stroke. Brain Res 2001;889: 278–287.
Finger S, Koehler PJ, Jagella C. The Monakow concept of diaschisis: origins and perspectives. Arch Neurol 2004;61: 283–288.
Flint AC, Naley MC, Wright CB. Ataxic hemiparesis from strategic frontal white matter infarction with crossed cerebellar diaschisis. Stroke [serial online] 2006;37: e1–2. Epub 2005 Nov. 23. Available at: stroke.ahajournals.org; unedited author manuscript available at http://www.pubmedcentral.gov.
Infeld B, Davis SM, Lichtenstein M, Mitchell PJ, Hopper JL. Crossed cerebellar diaschisis and brain recovery after stroke. Stroke 1995;26: 90–95.
Miura H, Nagata K, Hirata Y, Satoh Y, Watahiki Y, Hatazawa J. Evolution of crossed cerebellar diaschisis in middle cerebral artery infarction. J Neuroimaging 1994;4: 91–96.
Pantano P, Lenzi GL, Guidetti B, et al. Crossed cerebellar diaschisis in patients with cerebral ischemia assessed by SPECT and 123I-HIPDM. Eur Neurol 1987;27: 142–148.
Sobesky J, Thiel A, Ghaemi M, et al. Crossed cerebellar diaschisis in acute human stroke: a PET study of serial changes and response to supratentorial reperfusion. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2005;25: 1685–1691.
Cappa SF, Perani D, Grassi F, et al. A PET follow-up study of recovery after stroke in acute aphasics. Brain Lang 1997;56: 55–67.
Rizzo M, Robin DA. Bilateral effects of unilateral visual cortex lesions in human. Brain 1996;119: 951–963.
Seitz RJ, Azari NP, Knorr U, Binkofski F, Herzog H, Freund HJ. The role of diaschisis in stroke recovery. Stroke 1999;30: 1844–1850.
Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Lindeman E. Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2004;22: 281–299.
Feeney DM. From laboratory to clinic: noradrenergic enhancement of physical therapy for stroke or trauma patients. Adv Neurol 1997;73: 383–394.
Martinsson L, Eksborg S. Drugs for stroke recovery: the example of amphetamines. Drugs Aging 2004;21: 67–79.
Nudo RJ, Wise BM, SiFuentes F, Milliken GW. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science 1996;272: 1791–1794.
Nudo RJ, Milliken GW. Reorganization of movement representations in primary motor cortex following focal ischemic infarcts in adult squirrel monkeys. J Neurophysiol 1996;75: 2144–2149.
Jaillard A, Martin CD, Garambois K, Lebas JF, Hommel M. Vicarious function within the human primary motor cortex? A longitudinal fMRI stroke study. Brain 2005;128: 1122–1138.
Cramer SC, Nelles G, Benson RR, et al. A functional MRI study of subjects recovered from hemiparetic stroke. Stroke 1997;28: 2518–2527.
Cramer SC, Shah R, Juranek J, Crafton KR, Le V. Activity in the peri-infarct rim in relation to recovery from stroke. Stroke 2006; 37: 111–115.
Loubinoux I, Carel C, Pariente J, et al. Correlation between cerebral reorganization and motor recovery after subcortical infarcts. Neuroimage 2003;20: 2166–2180.
Werhahn KJ, Conforto AB, Kadom N, Hallett M, Cohen LG. Contribution of the ipsilateral motor cortex to recovery after chronic stroke. Ann Neurol 2003;54: 464–472.
Fridman EA, Hanakawa T, Chung M, Hummel F, Leiguarda RC, Cohen LG. Reorganization of the human ipsilesional premotor cortex after stroke. Brain 2004;127: 747–758.
Calautti C, Leroy F, Guincestre JY, Marie RM, Baron JC. Sequential activation brain mapping after subcortical stroke: changes in hemispheric balance and recovery. Neuroreport 2001; 12: 3883–3886.
Marshall RS, Perera GM, Lazar RM, Krakauer JW, Constantine RC, DeLaPaz RL. Evolution of cortical activation during recovery from corticospinal tract infarction. Stroke 2000;31: 656–661.
Feydy A, Carlier R, Roby-Brami A, et al. Longitudinal study of motor recovery after stroke: recruitment and focusing of brain activation. Stroke 2002;33: 1610–1617.
Johansen-Berg H, Rushworth MF, Bogdanovic MD, Kischka U, Wimalaratna S, Matthews PM. The role of ipsilateral premotor cortex in hand movement after stroke. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99: 14518–14523.
Lotze M, Markert J, Sauseng P, Hoppe J, Plewnia C, Gerloff C. The role of multiple contralesional motor areas for complex hand movements after internal capsular lesion. J Neurosci 2006;26: 6096–6102.
Rossini PM, Calautti C, Pauri F, Baron JC. Post-stroke plastic reorganisation in the adult brain. Lancet Neurol 2003;2: 493–502.
Murase N, Duque J, Mazzocchio R, Cohen LG. Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke. Ann Neurol 2004;55: 400–409.
Meyer BU, Roricht S, Grafin von Einsiedel H, Kruggel F, Weindl A. Inhibitory and excitatory interhemispheric transfers between motor cortical areas in normal humans and patients with abnormalities of the corpus callosum. Brain 1995;118: 429–440.
Chen R. Interactions between inhibitory and excitatory circuits in the human motor cortex. Exp Brain Res 2004;154: 1–10.
Liepert J, Hallett M, Samii A, et al. Motor cortex excitability in patients with cerebellar degeneration. Clin Neurophysiol 2000; 111: 1157–1164.
Cicinelli P, Pasqualetti P, Zaccagnini M, Traversa R, Oliveri M, Rossini PM. Interhemispheric asymmetries of motor cortex excitability in the postacute stroke stage: a paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Stroke 2003;34: 2653–2658.
Manganotti P, Patuzzo S, Cortese F, Palermo A, Smania N, Fiaschi A. Motor disinhibition in affected and unaffected hemisphere in the early period of recovery after stroke. Clin Neurophysiol 2002;113: 936–943.
Kapur N. Paradoxical functional facilitation in brain-behaviour research: a critical review. Brain 1996;119: 1775–1790.
Finger S, Beyer T, Koehler PJ. Dr. Otto Soltmann (1876) on development of the motor cortex and recovery after its removal in infancy. Brain Res Bull 2000;3: 133–140.
Nudo RJ, Milliken GW, Jenkins WM, Merzenich MM. Use-dependent alterations of movement representations in primary motor cortex of adult squirrel monkeys. J Neurosci 1996;16: 785–807.
Xerri C, Merzenich MM, Peterson BE, Jenkins W. Plasticity of primary somatosensory cortex paralleling sensorimotor skill recovery from stroke in adult monkeys. J Neurophysiol 1998;79: 2119–2148.
Brown JA, Lutsep HL, Weinand M, Cramer SC. Motor cortex stimulation for the enhancement of recovery from stroke: a prospective, multicenter safety study. Neurosurgery 2006;58: 464–473.
Teskey GC, Flynn C, Goertzen CD, Monfils MH, Young NA. Cortical stimulation improves skilled forelimb use following a focal ischemic infarct in the rat. Neurol Res 2003;25: 794–800.
Hallett M. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the human brain. Nature 2000;406: 147–150.
Siebner HR, Rothwell J. Transcranial magnetic stimulation: new insights into representational cortical plasticity. Exp Brain Res 2003;148: 1–16.
Paulus W. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Suppl Clin Neurophysiol 2003;56: 249–254.
Wassermann EM, Grafman J. Recharging cognition with DC brain polarization. Trends Cogn Sci 2005;9: 503–505.
Nitsche MA, Liebetanz D, Antal A, Lang N, Tergau F, Paulus W. Modulation of cortical excitability by weak direct current stimulation: technical, safety and functional aspects. Suppl Clin Neurophysiol 2003;56: 255–276.
Gandiga PC, Hummel FC, Cohen LG. Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): a tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 2006; 117: 845–850.
Wassermann EM. Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5–7, 1996. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998;108: 1–16.
Iyer MB, Mattu U, Grafman J, Lomarev M, Sato S, Wassermann EM. Safety and cognitive effect of frontal DC brain polarization in healthy individuals. Neurology 2005;64: 872–875.
Lang N, Siebner R, Ward NS, et al. How does transcranial DC stimulation of the primary motor cortex alter regional neuronal activity in the human brain? Eur J Neurosci 2005;22: 495–504.
Bestmann S, Baudewig J, Siebner HR, Rothwell JC, Frahm J. Functional MRI of the immediate impact of transcranial magnetic stimulation on cortical and subcortical motor circuits. Eur J Neurosci 2004;19: 1950–1962.
Wagner T, Fregni F, Eden U, et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and stroke: a computer-based human model study. Neuroimage 2006;30: 857–870.
Kobayashi M, Hutchinson S, Theoret H, Schlaug G, Pascual-Leone A. Repetitive TMS of the motor cortex improves ipsilateral sequential simple finger movements. Neurology 2004;62: 91–98.
Kim YH, You SH, Ko MH, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced corticomotor excitability and associated motor skill acquisition in chronic stroke. Stroke 2006.
Tegenthoff M, Ragert P, Pleger B, et al. Improvement of tactile discrimination performance and enlargement of cortical somatosensory maps after 5 Hz rTMS. PLoS Biol [serial online] 2005; 3: e362. Epub 2005 Oct. 18. Available at: http://biology.plosjournals.org.
Rosen SC, Stamm JS. Transcortical polarization: facilitation of delayed response performance by monkeys. Exp Neurol 1972;35: 282–289.
Elbert T, Rockstroh B, Lutzenberger W, Birbaumer N. The influence of low-level, event-related DC-currents during time estimation in humans. Int J Neurosci 1981;15: 103–106.
Elbert T, Rockstroh B, Lutzenberger W, Birbaumer N. Influence of low-level transcortical DC-currents on response speed in humans. Int J Neurosci 1981;14: 101–114.
Nitsche MA, Schauenburg A, Lang N, et al. Facilitation of implicit motor learning by weak transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex in the human. J Cogn Neurosci 2003;15: 619–626.
Fregni F, Boggio PS, Mansur CG, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Neuroreport 2005;16: 1551–1555.
Kincses TZ, Antal A, Nitsche MA, Bartfai O, Paulus W. Facilitation of probabilistic classification learning by transcranial direct current stimulation of the prefrontal cortex in the human. Neuropsychologia 2004;42: 113–117.
Antal A, Nitsche MA, Kruse W, Kincses TZ, Hoffmann KP, Paulus W. Direct current stimulation over V5 enhances visuomotor coordination by improving motion perception in humans. J Cogn Neurosci 2004;6: 521–527.
Bear MF, Malenka R. Synaptic plasticity: LTP and LTD. Curr Opin Neurobiol 1994;4: 389–399.
Woody CD, Gruen E, Birt D. Changes in membrane currents during Pavlovian conditioning of single cortical neurons. Brain Res 1991;539: 76–84.
Dancause N, Barbay S, Frost SB, et al. Extensive cortical rewiring after brain injury. J Neurosci 2005;25: 10167–10179.
Hummel F, Celnik P, Giraux P, et al. Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. Brain 2005;128: 490–499.
Hummel F, Cohen LG. Improvement of motor function with noninvasive cortical stimulation in a patient with chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2005;19: 14–19.
Jebsen RH, Taylor N, Trieschmann RB, Trotter MJ, Howard LA. An objective and standardized test of hand function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1969;50: 311–319.
Kraft GH, Fitts SS, Hammond MC. Techniques to improve function of the arm and hand in chronic hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992;73: 220–227.
Alon G, Sunnerhagen KS, Geurts AC, Ohry A. A home-based, self-administered stimulation program to improve selected hand functions of chronic stroke. Neurorehabilitation 2003;18: 215–225.
Wu CW, Seo HJ, Cohen LG. Influence of electric somatosensory stimulation on paretic-hand function in chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87: 351–357.
Khedr EM, Ahmed MA, Fathy N, Rothwell JC. Therapeutic trial of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation after acute ischemic stroke. Neurology 2005;65: 466–468.
Swinnen SP. Intermanual coordination: from behavioural principles to neural-network interactions. Nat Rev Neurosci 2002;3: 348–359.
Plewnia C, Lotze M, Gerloff C. Disinhibition of the contralateral motor cortex by low-frequency rTMS. Neuroreport 2003;14: 609–612.
Schambra HM, Sawaki L, Cohen LG. Modulation of excitability of human motor cortex (M1) by 1 Hz transcranial magnetic stimulation of the contralateral M1. Clin Neurophysiol 2003;114: 130–133.
Kobayashi M, Hutchinson S, Schlaug G, Pascual-Leone A. Ipsilateral motor cortex activation on functional magnetic resonance imaging during unilateral hand movements is related to inter-hemispheric interactions. Neuroimage 2003;20: 2259–2270.
Takeuchi N, Chuma T, Matsuo Y, Watanabe I, Ikoma K. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of contralesional primary motor cortex improves hand function after stroke. Stroke 2005; 36: 2681–2686.
Mansur CG, Fregni F, Boggio PS, et al. A sham stimulation-controlled trial of rTMS of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Neurology 2005;64: 1802–1804.
Naeser MA, Martin PI, Nicholas M, et al. Improved picture naming in chronic aphasia after TMS to part of right Broca’s area: an open-protocol study. Brain Lang 2005;93: 95–105.
Naeser MA, Martin PI, Nicholas M, et al. Improved naming after TMS treatments in a chronic, global aphasia patient-case report. Neurocase 2005;11: 182–193.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Webster, B.R., Celnik, P.A. & Cohen, L.G. Noninvasive brain stimulation in stroke rehabilitation. NeuroRX 3, 474–481 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nurx.2006.07.008
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nurx.2006.07.008