Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Stroke

Misery perfusion in cerebrovascular disease—is it important?

Recent studies suggest that advances in medical therapy have reduced the risk of stroke in patients with major cerebral artery disease, but does this trend apply to those with misery perfusion? A new study indicates that these patients remain at very high risk, highlighting the unmet need for a preventative treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Grubb, R. L. Jr et al. Importance of hemodynamic factors in the prognosis of symptomatic carotid occlusion. JAMA 280, 1055–1060 (1998).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yamauchi, H. et al. Significance of increased oxygen extraction fraction in five-year prognosis of major cerebral arterial occlusive diseases. J. Nucl. Med. 40, 1992–1998 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Marquardt, L., Geraghty, O. C., Mehta, Z. & Rothwell, P. M. Low risk of ipsilateral stroke in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis on best medical treatment: a prospective, population-based study. Stroke 41, e11–e17 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yamauchi, H. et al. Is misery perfusion still a predictor of stroke in symptomatic major cerebral artery disease? Brain http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/aws131.

  5. Powers, W. J. et al. Extracranial–intracranial bypass surgery for stroke prevention in hemodynamic cerebral ischemia: the Carotid Occlusion Surgery Study randomized trial. JAMA 306, 1983–1992 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. [No authors listed]. Failure of extracranial–intracranial arterial bypass to reduce the risk of ischemic stroke. Results of an international randomized trial. The EC–IC Bypass Study Group. N. Engl. J. Med. 313, 1191–1200 (1985).

  7. Powers, W. J. et al. Improving prognosis of medically treated hemodynamic cerebral ischemia is associated with more lipid lowering therapy [abstract S12.001]. Presented at the 63rd Meeting of the American Academy of Neurology, Honolulu, HI, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Marshall, R. S. et al. Cerebral hemodynamics and cognitive impairment: baseline data from the RECON trial. Neurology 78, 250–255 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. JET Study Group. Japanese EC–IC Bypass Trial (JET Study): the second interim analysis. Surg. Cereb. Stroke 30, 434–437 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Powers, W. J. Management of patients with atherosclerotic carotid occlusion. Curr. Treat. Options Neurol. 13, 608–615 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Powers, W. Misery perfusion in cerebrovascular disease—is it important?. Nat Rev Neurol 8, 479–480 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2012.147

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2012.147

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing