Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Develop a taxonomy for understanding and classifying goals in the care of persons with dementia.
DESIGN: Qualitative study using open-ended interviews with key informants and the constant comparative method of qualitative data analysis.
SETTING: The geriatric assessment center at a large academic medical center in Connecticut.
PARTICIPANTS: Key informant interviews with 36 subjects: consecutive patients receiving geriatric assessment at the center and their primary family caregivers, case managers, and physicians of patients.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Goals, or desired outcomes, for the patient’s care as described by patients, primary family caregivers, case managers, and physicians were the main measurements. Participant interviews were conducted until the point of theoretical saturation, i.e., until further interviews no longer provided new concepts. All participants articulated at least one goal. Specific goals were characterized by a limited number of goal attributes resulting in a taxonomy, or consistent classification system, for reported goals. These attributes include domain (or content), specificity, time frame, and level of challenge.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggested that patients, primary family caregivers, and clinicians can articulate goals of care and may bring differing perspectives to the goal-setting process. The research identified a taxonomy that may facilitate negotiation of goals by revealing important, and perhaps overlooked, aspects of goals and the goal-setting process.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Austin JT, Vancouver JB. Goal constructs in psychology: structure, process, and content. Psychol Bull. 1996;120:338–75.
Locke EA, Latham GP. A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1990.
Arvey RD, Dewhirst HD, Brown EM. A longitudinal study of the impact of changes in goal setting on employees satisfaction. Personal Psychol. 1978;31:595–608.
French WL, Bell CH. Organization Development: Behavioral Science Interventions for Organization Improvement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1984.
Gould D. Goal setting for peak performance. In: Williams J, ed. Applied Sport Psychology: Personal Growth to Peak Performance. Palo Alto, Calif: Mayfield; 1986.
Lee TW, Locke EA, Latham GP. Goal setting theory and job performance. In: Pervin L, ed. Goal Concepts in Personality and Social Psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: L Erlbaum; 1989.
Kiresuk TJ, Sherman RE. Goal attainment scaling: a general method of evaluating comprehensive mental health programs. Community Ment Health J. 1968;4:443–53.
Palisano RJ, Haley SM, Brown DA. Goal attainment scaling as a measure of change in infants with motor delay. Phys Ther. 1992;72:432–7.
Palisano RJ. Validity of goal attainment scaling in infants with motor delays. Phys Ther. 1993;73:651–60.
Greenville J, Lyne P. Patient centered evaluation and rehabilitation care. J Adv Nurs. 1995;22:965–72.
Stolee P, Rockwood K, Fox RA, Steiner DL. The use of goal attainment scaling in a geriatric care setting. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992;40:574–8.
Rockwood K, Stolee P, Fox RA. Use of goal attainment scaling in measuring clinically important change in the frail elderly. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46:1113–8.
England M. Content domain for care giver planning identified by adult offspring care givers. Image J Nurs Sch. 1996;28(1):17–22.
Gignac MAM, Gottlieb BH. Care givers’ appraisals of efficacy in coping with dementia. Psychol Aging. 1996;11(2):214–25.
Ugarriza DN, Gray T. Alzheimer’s disease: nursing interventions for clients and caretakers. J Psychosoc Nurs. 1993;31(10):7–10.
Ryden MB, Feldt KS. Goal-directed care: caring for aggressive nursing home residents with dementia. J Gerontol Nurs. 1992;18(1):35–41.
Von Korff M, Gruman J, Schaefer J, et al. Collaborative management of chronic illness. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127:1097–102.
Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter; 1967.
Locke EA, Chah DC, Harrison S, Lustgarten N. Separating the effects of goal specificity from goal level. Org Behav Hum Decis Processes. 1989;42:270–87.
Kirschenbaum DS. Proximity and specificity of planning: a position paper. Cognitive Ther Res. 1985;9:489–506.
Bandura A, Simon KM. The role of proximal intentions in self regulation of refractory behavior. Cognitive Ther Res. 1977;1:177–93.
Erez M, Zidon I. Effect of goal acceptance on the relationship of goal difficulty to performance. J Appl Psychol. 1984;69:69–79.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by a grant from the Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center at the Yale School of Medicine.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bogardus, S.T., Bradley, E.H. & Tinetti, M.E. A taxonomy for goal setting in the care of persons with dementia. J GEN INTERN MED 13, 675–680 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00203.x
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00203.x