[Pallidal and subthalamic stimulation in Parkinson's disease: lessons from the unsatisfactory results]

Neurologia. 2001 Aug-Sep;16(7):298-302.
[Article in Spanish]

Abstract

Background: Deep brain stimulation is being widely used in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). Outcome determinants are not known.

Objective: Some relevant data about outcome may be obtained from the study of patients with unsatisfactory results.

Patients and methods: We have retrospectively analyzed the number and causes of unsatisfactory results (insufficient improvement 6 months after the intervention) in 211 patients.

Results: Forty patients (18.9%) experienced an unsatisfactory result. Inadequate clinical selection by advanced age, abnormal MRI and levodopa unresponsive symptoms was the main cause in 28 cases. In 11 patients a misplacement of the electrode was reported. In 2 cases no cause was identified. Thirty-four out of the 40 patients corresponded to the early experience of the teams involved in the study.

Conclusion: We conclude that the main factors responsible for a negative outcome are related to the inadequate clinical selection of the patients and the incorrect placement of the electrode. The experience of the team may also be a key factor.

Publication types

  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Antiparkinson Agents / therapeutic use
  • Clinical Competence
  • Combined Modality Therapy
  • Electric Stimulation Therapy*
  • Globus Pallidus / physiopathology*
  • Humans
  • Levodopa / therapeutic use
  • Microelectrodes*
  • Parkinson Disease / drug therapy
  • Parkinson Disease / physiopathology
  • Parkinson Disease / therapy*
  • Patient Care Team
  • Patient Selection*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Subthalamus / physiopathology*
  • Treatment Failure

Substances

  • Antiparkinson Agents
  • Levodopa