Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Comparison of CT in patients with cerebral ischaemia with or without non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation. European Atrial Fibrillation Trial and Dutch T I A Trial Study Groups.
  1. J van Latum,
  2. P J Koudstaal,
  3. L J Kappelle,
  4. F van Kooten,
  5. A Algra,
  6. J van Gijn
  1. University Hospital Rotterdam Dijkzigt, The Netherlands.


    In an attempt to distinguish between the CT characteristics of strokes of presumed cardioembolic origin and strokes caused by arterial disease, a comparison was made between the baseline CT of two prospective cohorts of patients with transient ischaemic attack or minor ischaemic stroke, with (n = 985) or without (n = 2987) non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation (NRAF). Of the patients with NRAF 54% had evidence of cerebral infarction v 41% of the controls (patients with sinus rhythm (SR); odds ratio (OR) 1.7; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.4-1.9). Patients with NRAF more often had multiple infarcts (OR 1.4; 95% CI 1.1-1.8), and more often infarcts that were not related to current neurological symptoms (OR 1.5; 95% CI 1.2-1.8). For symptomatic infarcts, patients with NRAF more often had cortical end zone infarcts (OR 3.1; 95% CI 2.6-3.8) and cortical border zone infarcts (OR 1.9; 95% CI 1.3-2.9) than patients with SR. Conversely, symptomatic small deep infarcts (lacunae) were more often seen in patients with SR (OR 3.9; 95% CI 2.8-5.4). Multivariate analyses showed that all these findings were independent of differences in baseline characteristics between the two study groups. The CT characteristics overlapped and did not allow a reliable distinction between cardioembolic and atherosclerotic causes of stroke in patients with NRAF.

    Statistics from

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.