OBJECTIVES Most studies that clinically validated peri-ictal SPECT in intractable partial epilepsy had used technetium-99m-hexamethylpropylene amine oxime (99mTc-HMPAO or 99mTc-exametazime) as the radiopharmaceutical. Because of some theoretical advantages, technetium-99m-ethyl cysteinate diethylester (99mTc-ECD or99mTc-bicisate) is increasingly being used instead. This study compares unstabilised 99mTc-HMPAO and99mTc-ECD in the performance of peri-ictal SPECT in partial epilepsy.
METHODS The injection timing and localisation rates in 49 consecutive patients with partial epilepsy who had peri-ictal injections with unstabilised99mTc-HMPAO were compared with 49 consecutive patients who had peri-ictal injections with 99mTc-ECD. Quantitative cortical/subcortical and cortical/extracerebral uptake ratios were also compared. Subtraction SPECT coregistered to MRI (SISCOM) was performed in patients whose interictal SPECTS were available.
RESULTS In the99mTc-ECD patients, the latency from seizure commencement to injection was shorter (median 34 v 80 seconds, p<0.0001) and there was a lower rate of postictal injections (16.3% v 57.1%, p<0.0001). The cortical/extracerebral and cortical/subcortical uptake ratios were greater in the 99mTc-ECD images (median 5.0v 3.6, and 2.5 v2.2 respectively; both p<0.005), but the relative peri-ictal increase in uptake in the cortical focus did not differ significantly (median 37.0% v 37.0%; p>0.05). Blinded review of the SISCOM images were localising in a higher proportion of the99mTc-ECD patients (40/45 (88.9%)v 25/37 (67.6%), p<0.05), and had a better concordance with EEG, MRI, and with the discharge diagnosis.
CONCLUSION 99mTc-ECD compares favourably with unstabilised 99mTc-HMPAO as a radiopharmaceutical for peri-ictal SPECT studies. Its use results in earlier injections and less frequent postictal injections than unstabilised 99mTc-HMPAO, thereby enhancing the sensitivity and the specificity of peri-ictal SPECT for the localisation of intractable partial epilepsy.
- Ictal SPECT
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Peri-ictal SPECT shows great promise as a tool to accurately localise seizures in intractable partial epilepsy, particularly in those with temporal lobe seizures.1-6 Moreover, the recent development of computer aided methods of subtracting the interictal SPECT images from the ictal images, with the subsequent coregistration of the difference images on to the MRI, has been shown to further improve the clinical usefulness of SPECT, especially in extratemporal epilepsy and in epilepsy that is difficult to localise.7-13 The radiopharmaceutical used in the vast majority of studies of peri-ictal SPECT has been technetium-99m-hexamethylpropylene amine oxime (99mTc-HMPAO or 99mTc-exametazime), which is unstable and needs to be reconstituted immediately before injection.14 Thus, the performance of true ictal SPECT studies with unstabilised 99mTc-HMPAO is difficult, particularly in patients with extratemporal seizures which are usually brief. Technetium-99m-ethyl cysteinate diethylester (99mTc-ECD or 99mTc-bicisate) is a relatively new brain SPECT perfusion radiopharmaceutical that has uptake kinetics and distribution similar to 99mTc-HMPAO, but is stable in vitro for up to 6–8 hours after constitution.15Therefore, it does not require mixing just before injection. As a result, the use of 99mTc-ECD may facilitate earlier injections, and thereby, may improve seizure localisation.16 17
99mTc-ECD has only recently been used clinically for peri-ictal SPECT studies, with small preliminary studies reporting generally encouraging results.7 8 16-19 However, some authors have suggested that the focal ictal uptake of99mTc-ECD may not be as intense as with99mTc-HMPAO.19-21 There is evidence that the two radiopharmaceuticals may show somewhat different distributions in some pathological conditions,22-26 which is likely related to different mechanisms of cerebral uptake.23 27-31 Therefore, the sensitivity and the specificity of 99mTc-ECD need to be evaluated, especially in relation to those of the more established agent99mTc-HMPAO. As yet, there has been no study that has directly compared these radiopharmaceuticals in peri-ictal studies of partial epileptic seizures.
In this study, we compared a group of consecutive intractable partial epilepsy patients who had peri-ictal SPECT using 99mTc-ECD with another group of consecutive patients who had unstabilised99mTc-HMPAO peri-ictal SPECT. The purpose was to determine whether the use of 99mTc-ECD was associated with shorter injection latencies and fewer postictal injections, and to compare its sensitivity and specificity for seizure localisation with those of99mTc-HMPAO. We also compared the radiopharmaceuticals for the magnitude of the ictal focal cortical increase in uptake, as well as for the cortical/subcortical and the cortical/extracerebral uptake ratios.
PATIENT AND SPECT RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL SELECTION
We studied 49 consecutive patients with intractable partial epilepsy who had peri-ictal SPECT injections performed at the Mayo Medical Center, Rochester, MN, USA, using unstabilised99mTc-HMPAO (June 1993–January 1995) and another 49 consecutive patients in whom 99mTc-ECD was used (November 1993–January 1995). From November 1993 until January 1995, all adult patients being considered for peri-ictal SPECT study were offered the option of participating in an open label phase II trial using99mTc-ECD for their SPECT study. (The trial was approved by our institutional review board.) During this period, 12 patients were studied with 99mTc-ECD and another 32 were studied with99mTc-HMPAO. After this period, 99mTc-ECD was used for all peri-ictal SPECT.
CLINICAL AND SEIZURE INFORMATION
The patents’ medical records were abstracted for demographic and clinical information. Video tapes of the injected seizures were reviewed for the time of onset and termination of clinical seizures, and the timing of the injection. Seizure onset was defined as the time of earliest indication of a warning (verbalised or pushing the call button), or of abnormal movements, behaviour, or impaired awareness. The end of a seizure was the time when the ictal movements or behaviour ceased. When the start and/or the end of the seizure could not be confidently established from clinical features, the beginning and/or the end of the rhythmic seizure discharge on the ictal EEG was used for the seizure timing. The injections were divided into those that were “ictal” (the injection was performed while there was continuing clinical and/or electrographic seizure activity), and those that were “postictal”.
RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATION AND INJECTION METHODS
99mTc-HMPAO was prepared in accordance with the product information guidelines using the Ceretec kit (Amersham Corporation, Arlington Heights, Illinois, IL, USA).14 In the Nuclear Medicine radiopharmaceutical laboratory, approximately 100 mCi (3.7 GBq) of sterile freshly eluated, oxidant free99mTc sodium pertechnetate was diluted up to 5 ml with 0.9% sodium chloride in a shielded syringe. This was then placed in a lead lined container and transported to the epilepsy monitoring unit for storage until use. At the time the patient’s seizure was noted to commence, the EEG technician injected the contents of the99mTc sodium pertechnetate syringe into the Ceretec vial. After the solution was thoroughly mixed for about 10 seconds, the appropriate dose for injection was then withdrawn from the vial for injection into the patient. This procedure of radiopharmaceutical preparation took a trained technician 30–40 seconds to complete.
99mTc-ECD was labelled and reconstituted using the Neurolite kit (Du Pont Merck Pharmaceutical Company, Billerica, MA, USA) in accordance with the product information,15 before delivery to the epilepsy monitoring unit. 100 mCi (3.7 GBq) sterile, oxidant free 99mTc sodium pertechnetate in approximately 2.0 ml was added to the buffer vial (vial B). The lyophilised ligand vial (vial A) was reconstituted by the addition of 3.0 ml 0.9% sodium chloride, and then 1.0 ml of this solution was added to vial B. The preparation was thoroughly mixed for a few seconds and allowed to stand for 30 minutes.15 A rapid preparation technique was alternatively used in which the contents were microwaved for 8 seconds at 300 W.32 The radiochemical purity was checked using paper chromatography to ensure that it was greater than 90%.33 The solution was then drawn into a shielded syringe, placed into a lead lined container, and transported to the epilepsy monitoring unit.
The peri-ictal radiopharmaceutical injections were performed by epilepsy technicians during a typical seizure while the patients were undergoing video-EEG monitoring in our inpatient epilepsy monitoring unit. The technicians had been specifically trained to perform the injections, which included taking a course in radiation safety. The interictal injections were performed when the patient had been seizure free for at least 24 hours, in standard ambient room lighting with eyes open and ears unplugged. The radiopharmaceutical dose injected was approximately 20 mCi (740 MBg) for all studies.
Using an identical protocol for both studies, the SPECT images were acquired with the same scanner within 2 to 3 hours of the radiopharmaceutical injection. A dual head gamma camera system (Helix, Elscint Inc, Haifa, Israel) equipped with ultrahigh resolution fan beam collimators was employed. The data were acquired in a 128×128 byte matrix over 360 degrees, with 120 views obtained at 3 degree intervals for 15 seconds per view using a circular orbit. The energy setting was 140 keV with a 15%-20% window. Transaxial images were reconstructed using a Metz filter (power=3, full width at half maximum (FWHM)=6 mm) rebinned into a 64×64 matrix with a 2×zoom. Attenuation correction was applied and images were viewed in the usual three orthogonal planes. The reconstructed system resolution was approximately 7 mm FWHM, consisting of cubic voxels with dimensions of 3.6 or 4.4 mm (depending on the image size). Images were reconstructed using a standard filtered back projection algorithm in the coronal, sagittal, transaxial, and transtemporal planes.
For all patients in whom both an interictal SPECT scan and a brain MRI were available (37 of the 99mTc-HMPAO patients and 45 of the 99mTc-ECD patients) subtraction ictal SPECT coregistered to MRI (SISCOM) images (fig 1) were constructed on an off line Unix based workstation with the aid of commercial image analysis software packages7 (ANALYZE 7.5 and Analyze/AVW, Biomedical Imaging Resource, Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN, USA) and with the use of a chamfer distance based surface matching technique34.
QUANTITATIVE SPECT ANALYSIS
The quantitative SPECT studies were performed by a single operator (BHB) who was blinded to clinical details, results of other investigations, and results of the qualitative analysis. For the quantitative analysis, SPECT images were reformatted so that they were all composed of cubic voxels with the same dimensions (1.8×1.8×1.8 mm). Six circular regions of interest (ROIs) with a 9.0 mm diameter were used to measure the relative uptake in the neocortex, the subcortical white matter, and the extracranial tissue. On a single coronal slice at the mid-temporal level, these ROIs were respectively placed bilaterally over the parietal cortex, the adjacent parietal subcortical white matter, and extracerebral tissue, as shown in fig 2A, for both the ictal and the interictal studies. The mean intensity within each of these ROIs was measured, and the corresponding right and left ROI values for each region were averaged to minimise the influence of the side of lateralisation of the epileptogenic zone. The cortical/subcortical and the cortical/extracerebral uptake ratios were then calculated for both the ictal and interictal studies to minimise the effects of any focal cortical hyperperfusion in the ictal studies or focal hypoperfusion in the interictal studies. These results were compared between the 99mTc-HMPAO patients and the99mTc-ECD patients. The rationale for comparing these ratios was to determine whether 99mTc-ECD has a superior brain to extracerebral or cortical to white matter contrast, which has been stated as a potential advantage of the agent.
To quantify the magnitude of the maximal focal cortical ictal increase in uptake, a single circular ROI was placed over the visually identified focus of hyperperfusion on the unthresholded subtraction image (fig 2 B). The mean intensity value for this ROI was then calculated and expressed as a percentage increase in intensity from the interictal to the ictal image. This value was then compared between the99mTc-HMPAO and the 99mTc-ECD patients.
BLINDED QUALITATIVE SPECT INTERPRETATION
Both the traditional visual side by side ictal and interictal scans and the SISCOM images were interpreted independently by two reviewers (BPM and ELS) who were blinded to the clinical data, the SPECT radiopharmaceutical group, and the results of other tests. The reviewers were told whether the injections were ictal or postictal, and if postictal, they were also informed of the seizure length and injection timing. For the traditional visual interpretation, both the colour scale and grey scale images were used. For the SISCOM review, only 2SD images were used for those with ictal injection, but both the 1SD and 2SD images were used for those with postictal injections. The reviewers were asked to localise the images to one of 16 sites (either right or left: frontal, frontotemporal, temporal, frontoparietal temporoparietal, parietal, occipitoparietal, or occipital), or classify them as being non-localising. Final determination was based on the agreement of the reviewers on the localisation or non-localisation of the studies. If the two reviewers disagreed, a third blinded reviewer was used (MFH). Agreement of the third reviewer with one of the primary reviewers served as the final determination. If the third reviewer’s localisation did not agree with one of the primary reviewers, the study was considered non-localising.
COMPARISON WITH THE EEG AND MRI LOCALISATION AND DISCHARGE DIAGNOSIS.
Brain MRI was performed according to a standardised seizure protocol35 on a 1.5 Tesla Signa scanner (GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI, USA). Ictal scalp-EEG was recorded using a 32 channel system with the electrodes arranged according to a modified 10–20 system that included subtemporal electrodes. Thirty of the patients had further prolonged monitoring with intracranial electrodes (14 of the 99mTc-HMPAO patients and 16 of the99mTc-ECD patients). Thirteen had subdural strips/grids, four had bitemporal depth electrodes, and 13 had a combination of both strip/grids and depth electrodes. The localisations by ictal scalp EEG, ictal intracranial EEG, and seizure protocol MRI were determined by retrospective review of their reports. The discharge diagnosis was that given by the epileptologist on completion of the video-EEG monitoring, and was based on an assimilation of all localising or lateralising information available, except that of the SPECT studies (for example, the results of MRI, prolonged video-EEG, and the clinical history). The discharge diagnosis, as well as the localisations by ictal scalp EEG, ictal intracranial EEG, and MRI, were compared with the localisation by traditional review of SPECT images and with the localisation by SISCOM images.
Two tailed Fisher’s exact test was used for comparisons between proportions. Student’s t test (two tailed) was applied for comparisons of continuous variables that were approximately normally distributed and the Mann-WhitneyU test was used for comparisons of ordinal and non-normally distributed continuous variables. Probability levels<0.05 were considered significant. Interobserver agreement between primary reviewers for the blinded image interpretations was determined using Cohen’s Kappa (κ) scores calculated for 17 possible choices.36 Agreement was considered poor when κ was <0.4, good when >0.4 but <0.75, and excellent when >0.75.37
DEMOGRAPHIC, CLINICAL, AND INJECTION DETAILS
Of the 98 patients in the study, 52 (53.1%) were male and 46 (46.9%) were female. The median age of the patients was 28 years with a range of 1.5–69 years. Table 1 compares the demographic details, discharge diagnoses, and seizure and injection timing between patients who had 99mTc-HMPAO and patients who had99mTc-ECD injections. There was no significant difference between the two groups in age, sex, and proportion of patients with temporal versus extratemporal or unlocalised partial epilepsy (all p>0.05). The details of the discharge diagnoses in the two groups are given in table 2.
99mTc-ECD patients had a significantly shorter injection latency (p<0.001, Student’s t tests).99mTc-ECD patients also had a significantly lower proportion of postictal injections than 99mTc-HMPAO patients (16.3% v 57.1%; p<0.001, Fisher’s exact test). The duration of the injected seizure did not significantly differ between the groups. When the analysis was restricted to patients who had peri-ictal SPECT during the time period when both 99mTc-HMPAO and 99mTc-ECD were being used, 99mTc-ECD patients (n=12) again had a significantly shorter injection latency than 99mTc-HMPAO patients (n=32) (median 41, range 19–58 seconds, v median 77, range 3–194 seconds; p<0.01, Student’st test) and a lower proportion of postictal injections (8.3% v 56.3%; p<0.01, Fisher’s exact test). The duration of the injected seizures again did not significantly differ between the groups (median 56.5, range 22–172, v median 61.5, range 5–314 seconds; p>0.05, Student’s ttest).
QUANTITATIVE SPECT ANALYSIS
The median value for the cortical/extracerebral ROI intensity ratios was significantly greater for the ECD images than the99mTc-HMPAO images (median 5.0 v3.6; p<0.0.001, Mann-Whitney U test). Median value for the cortical/subcortical ROI intensity ratios was also greater for the 99mTc-ECD images (2.5v 2.2; p<0.01, Mann-WhitneyU test).
There was no difference in the relative ictal increase in uptake in the cortical focus between the subtraction images of 99mTc-ECD and of 99mTc-HMPAO studies (median 37.0%v 37.0%; p>0.05, Mann-WhitneyU test). Also, there was no significant difference between the radiopharmaceutical groups when subgroup analyses were performed on patients with ictal injections (37.3%v 34.1%, p>0.05) or on patients with postictal injections (34.6% v 40.8%, p>0.05).
BLINDED SPECT INTERPRETATION
Fifteen patients did not have an interictal SPECT performed and one patient did not have MRI available for coregistration. The blinded review of the SISCOM images and the traditional side by side ictal-interictal SPECT images was performed on the remaining patients (37 in the 99mTc-HMPAO group and 45 in the99mTc-ECD group). The results of the blinded analysis for the SISCOM images are summarised in table 3. Overall,99mTc-ECD studies were determined to be localising in a significantly higher proportion than 99mTc-HMPAO studies (p<0.05, Fisher’s exact test). However, when patients who had ictal injections were analysed separately from those with postictal injections, there was no significant difference in the localisation rates between the radiopharmaceutical groups. The interobserver agreement between the two primary reviewers was significantly higher for the 99mTc-ECD images than for the99mTc-HMPAO images (κ=0.80 vκ=0.61, p<0.05). However, the interobserver agreement was not significantly different between the radiopharmaceutical groups when those with ictal injections were analysed separately from those with postictal injections.
Using the traditional side by side visual comparison of the SPECT, there was no significant difference between 99mTc-ECD and99mTc-HMPAO studies in the proportion that were localising (32.4% v 37.8%; p>0.05, Fisher’s exact test), but the interobserver agreement was significantly better for the99mTc-ECD studies (51.1% v37.8%; κ=0.43 v 0.29, p<0.05). Compared with side by side visual comparison of SPECT images, the SISCOM method was localising in a significantly higher proportion of both99mTc-ECD and 99mTc-HMPAO patients (both p<0.005, Fisher’s exact test), and for either ictal (88.0%v 38.0%, p<0.0001) or postictal injection (65.6% v 40.0%, p<0.005).
COMPARISON WITH MRI, EEG LOCALISATION, AND DISCHARGE DIAGNOSIS
The seizure protocol MRI showed a potentially epileptogenic focal lesion in 50 patients (24/49 of the 99mTc-HMPAO patients and 26/49 of the 99mTc-ECD patients, p>0.05). The types of lesions were: mesial temporal sclerosis 21, encephalomalacia 12, focal cortical dysgenesis 10, low grade tumour six, cavernoma one. The ictal scalp EEG was localising in 67 patients (33 of the99mTc-HMPAO and 34 of the 99mTc-ECD patients, p>0.05). Intracranial recordings were localising in 27/30 (90%) patients (14/14 of the 99mTc-HMPAO and 13/16 of the99mTc-ECD patients, p>0.05).
Table 4 summarises the concordance of the SISCOM localisation with the MRI, the EEG localisations, or the discharge diagnosis in the patients in whom both were localising or lateralising. Compared with99mTc-HMPAO, a significantly higher proportion of the99mTc-ECD localisations agreed with the intracranial EEG localisation (p<0.05, Fisher’s exact test). Compared with99mTc-HMPAO, there was also a trend for a greater proportion of 99mTc-ECD localisations to be concordant with the discharge diagnosis (p=0.07) and with the scalp ictal EEG localisation (p=0.11). However, there was no significant difference between radiopharmaceutical groups when the subgroups of ictal and postictal injections were analysed separately. No significant difference was found between 99mTc-HMPAO and99mTc-ECD groups in the concordance of localisation by the traditional SPECT review with the localisation by each of the following: MRI (7/9 (77.8%) v 10/12 (83.3%), p>0.05), ictal scalp EEG (7/9 (77.8%)v 12/13 (92.3%), p>0.05), ictal intracranial EEG (2/2 (100%) v 4/5 (80%), p>0.05), discharge diagnosis (7/10 (70.0%)v 14/15 (93.3%), p>0.05.
To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare the use of99mTc-ECD with that of 99mTc-HMPAO in peri-ictal SPECT. We found that the use of 99mTc-ECD is associated with significantly earlier SPECT injections than using unstabilised 99mTc-HMPAO, resulting in a significantly increased rate of obtaining an ictal SPECT study. These findings are not surprising and almost certainly are a direct result of not having to reconstitute the 99mTc-ECD just before injection, which we found took 30–40 seconds for the unstabilised99mTc-HMPAO to be prepared. Because many of our99mTc-ECD studies were performed more recently than our99mTc-HMPAO studies, it is possible that improvement in technician skills over time was partly responsible for the earlier injection timing with 99mTc-ECD. However, when analysis was restricted to patients who were injected during the time period when both radiopharmaceuticals were being used, the 99mTc-ECD patients still had a significantly shorter injection latency and a higher proportion of ictal injections. We also do not think that our results can be explained by differences in 99mTc-ECD and99mTc-HMPAO patient populations, as the two groups were well matched in the duration of injected seizures and in the proportions of each of following features: extratemporal epilepsies, MRI focal lesions, localising scalp EEG, and need for intracranial EEG recording (tables 1 and 2).
A stabilised formulation of 99mTc-HMPAO that does not require reconstitution immediately before injection has recently been approved for use in the United States. However, this is still not available or widely used in many countries. One of the arguments that has been put forward against the introduction of the more expensive stabilised radiopharmaceuticals is that shorter injection latency has not been previously proved to result in clinically significant improvement of seizure localisation. The results of our study also show that the use of 99mTc-ECD is associated with a significantly higher proportion of localising SISCOM studies than unstabilised 99mTc-HMPAO. The most important factor for this improvement in the sensitivity seems to be the shorter injection latency and the resultant fewer numbers of postictal injections. When patients with ictal and with postictal injections were analysed separately, there was no significant difference between the two radiopharmaceuticals in the rates of localisation. Also, the significantly lower interobserver agreement for the99mTc-HMPAO studies for both the SISCOM and the traditional visual analysis methods seems to be primarily explained by the difference in injection time; the difference between the two radiopharmaceuticals was not significant when the ictal injections and the postictal injections were analysed separately.
The blinded SISCOM analysis had a significantly higher localisation rate than the traditional side by side review of SPECT images for both radiopharmaceutical groups, and for both ictal and postictal injections. In a previous study, we had shown that SISCOM had a superior localisation rate with ictal studies.8 In this study, we extend this finding to postictal studies. In both studies, the sensitivity of the traditional method of reviewing peri-ictal SPECT images has been somewhat less than previously reported.2 6 38-43 The difference could be explained by our patient population, almost two thirds of which had extratemporal or unlocalised seizures, and almost half had non-lesional epilepsies. By contrast, almost all previous studies of peri-ictal SPECT were of selected groups of patients with mostly temporal lobe epilepsy or with seizures that were already well localised by other means.2 6 39-48 Moreover, our protocol for the blinded review of the SPECT studies was more exacting than most previous studies, which have generally required the reviewers to select from only a limited number of possible localisations, or to just lateralise the SPECT abnormality.2 6 39-48
Overall we found that the specificity of the SISCOM localisation was poorer for 99mTc-HMPAO studies than for99mTc-ECD studies (table 4). A significantly higher proportion of the 99mTc-HMPAO images in our study were localised to sites that were non-concordant with those localised by intracranial EEG. Also, there was a consistent trend for the99mTc-HMPAO images to have lower concordance with the localisation by MRI and by ictal scalp EEG, and with the discharge diagnosis. Again it seems that the difference was due to the increased number of postictal injections with 99mTc-HMPAO, as there was no significant difference between the radioisotopes within the ictal or the postictal subgroups. It is not surprising that injection latency is an important determinant of the sensitivity and the specificity of ictal SPECT. With early ictal studies, the region of hyperperfusion most probably reflects the site of the dominant seizure activity around the time of the radiopharmaceutical injection.6 49 50 A late ictal injection allows time for perfusion in secondary areas to become affected by the spread of the seizure activity, and for the activity in the primary epileptogenic zone to wane, resulting in a poorly or a falsely localised study.8 51 With postictal injections, the situation is even more complicated, as the primary epileptogenic zone often develops prominent postictal hypoperfusion, so that other areas may appear relatively hyperperfused.2 52 53 The “positive” subtraction SPECT images of a postictal study may therefore fail to detect hypoperfusion in the primary epileptogenic region, while displaying regions of hyperperfusion in areas that have been secondarily involved by seizure propagation. It is possible that the combined use of “positive” and “negative” subtraction SPECT may improve the sensitivity and specificity of SISCOM when the injection is postictal.
The new stabilised formulation of 99mTc-HMPAO may allow injection latencies to be similar to those we obtained with99mTc-ECD. None the less, when ictal injections and postictal injections were separately assessed, there was still a consistent trend for the SISCOM images in our 99mTc-HMPAO patients to have lower localisation rates, poorer interobserver agreements, and less concordance with the EEG, the MRI, or the discharge diagnosis. This suggests that the timing of injection is not the only factor that explains the difference between the radiopharmaceuticals. Uptake of 99mTc-HMPAO in the background extracerebral tissues has been reported to be higher than that of 99mTc-ECD, possibly due to the slower rate of clearance of 99mTc-HMPAO from the blood.24 54-57 The results of our quantitative analysis support this finding, with the 99mTc-HMPAO patients having a significantly lower cortical/extracerebral uptake ratio. The increased extracerebral uptake makes the derivation of a clear and accurate binary image for surface matching more difficult. This difficulty may result in poorer SPECT to SPECT coregistration, which increases the noise in the subtraction images and thereby reduces the sensitivity and specificity of the SISCOM method. Also, some authors have suggested that the grey-white differentiation in uptake may be greater with 99mTc-ECD than with 99mTc-HMPAO SPECT.17 54 57-59 The results of our quantitative analyses provide support for this opinion. 99mTc-ECD may therefore allow subtle focal changes in cortical uptake to be more readily detected because of their greater contrast against the background activity in the white matter and the extracerebral tissues.54 55
Some investigators have suggested that the focal ictal increase in uptake in partial seizures may be less prominent with99mTc-ECD than with99mTc-HMPAO.19-21 Our quantitative analysis of subtraction images disproves the suggestion, as the magnitude of the peri-ictal increase in focal cortical uptake was not significantly different between the radiopharmaceutical groups, for either ictal or postictal injections. Interestingly, the overall magnitude of the relative peri-ictal increase in SPECT uptake did not differ significantly between ictal and postictal studies. The most likely explanation is that postictally, there is a spatially progressive blood flow switch, with some regions becoming focally hypoperfused (for example, the lateral temporal neocortex) whereas other regions remain relatively hyperperfused for at least several minutes (for example, the mesial temporal region).1 2 In our study, relatively small ROIs were placed over the region of greatest relative hyperperfusion on the subtraction scan to quantify the maximum peri-ictal increase in radiopharmaceutical uptake. In the post-ictal studies, this ROI was placed over the region with persistent hyperperfusion. Thus, the maximum value for the relative increase in postictal uptake was similar to the value for the ictal scans (although the size of the region of focal hyperperfusion would be expected to be less with postictal studies).
In conclusion our study shows that 99mTc-ECD compares favourably with 99mTc-HMPAO as a radiopharmaceutical for the performance of peri-ictal SPECT studies of partial seizures. Its use was associated with shorter injection latencies and a higher proportion of ictal injections than with unstablised99mTc-HMPAO, thereby enhancing the sensitivity and specificity of localising seizures in intractable partial epilepsy.