BACKROUND Pathological tau protein concentrations in CSF are found in both Alzheimer's disease (AD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD), but studies on brain tissue have suggested that the tau pathology in AD differs from that in FTD and that the difference may be related to the degree of phosphorylation. As CSF tau protein is increased after stroke, tau may also be implicated in the pathophysiology of vascular dementia, of which subcortical arteriosclerotic encephalopathy (SAE) is a putative subtype.
OBJECTIVES To investigate the nature of tau protein in CSF and the involvement of total CSF tau and phosphorylated CSF tau (phosphotau) in various types of dementia.
METHODS Using ELISAs for total tau and tau phosphorylated at Thr181 (phosphotau), the CSF concentrations of total tau and phosphotau were determined in patients with probable and possible AD (n=41 and 19, respectively), FTD (n=18), SAE (n=17), and Parkinson's disease (PD; n=15) and in age matched controls (n=17). All the antibodies stained the lower molecular weight bands, whereas only the antibodies that recognise phosphorylated tau stained the higher molecular bands.
RESULTS Both CSF tau and CSF phosphotau were increased in probable AD compared with FTD (p<0.001), SAE (p<0.001), PD (p<0.001), and controls (p<0.001). CSF phosphotau was increased in possible AD compared with FTD (p<0.001) and SAE (p<0.001). CSF tau and CSF phosphotau were positively correlated in all the groups. Molecular weight forms of tau ranging from 25 kDa to 80 kDa were found in the CSF
CONCLUSION Both phosphorylated and unphosphorylated tau isoforms were present in the CSF, and tau protein appeared in both truncated and full length forms. The results suggest that the CSF concentrations of tau and phosphotau are increased in about two thirds of patients with probable AD and in half of those with possible AD but are normal in FTD, SAE, and PD compared with normal aging. Values in the normal range do not exclude AD.
- cerebrospinal fluid
- hyperphosphorylated tau
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
The most common types of primary degenerative dementia are Alzheimer's disease (AD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD). Although these disorders most probably are aetiologically different, they might share some pathophysiological mechanisms—for example the involvement of the structural protein tau. Filamentous tau pathology—that is, neurofibrillary tangles—are consistently found in AD1 but may also be found in FTD.2 Pathological tau protein is found in both AD and FTD,3 4 but studies on brain tissue have suggested that the tau pathology differs between AD and FTD and that the difference may be related to the degree of phosphorylation.4 The CSF concentrations of tau have most consistently been found to be increased in AD.5-11 In FTD, they have sometimes also been found to be increased7 12 13 and sometimes to be normal.14 15 Recently, mutations in the tau gene were found in some patient groups with hereditary forms of FTD.16 As CSF tau is increased after stroke (C Hesse, personal communication) tau may also be implicated in the pathophysiology of vascular dementia, of which subcortical arteriosclerotic encephalopathy (SAE) is a putative subtype.17 To elucidate the involvement of total tau protein (here referred to as tau) and phosphorylated tau (phosphotau) in various dementia disorders, we determined the CSF concentrations of tau and phosphotau in probable and possible AD, FTD, SAE, Parkinson's disease (PD), and normal controls. The relation between the neuronal markers (tau and phosphotau) was also evaluated, as was the influence of ApoE4 alleles on the CSF concentrations of these markers. Furthermore, tau was characterised in the CSF in dementia disorders.
Materials and methods
Included in the study were 18 patients with FTD (age range 48–77 years), 60 patients with AD (possible AD 68–88 years; probable AD 58–90 years), 17 patients with SAE (age range 67–84 years), 15 patients with PD (age range 59–82 years), and 17 controls (age range 68–80 years). Their characteristics are summarised in table 1. All patients included in the study had a clinical diagnosis of FTD, AD, SAE, or PD and were consecutively recruited from prospective longitudinal studies of patients with dementia or PD. Clinical diagnoses were established and CSF sampling was performed. Then neurochemical analyses were performed at the Institute of Clinical Neuroscience, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal. Excluded were patients with unspecified dementia (for example, mixed dementia), psychiatric disease (for example, schizophrenia), chronic alcoholism, distinct non-degenerative neurological disease (for example, normal pressure hydrocephalus), a history of severe head injury, infections in the CNS or systemic diseases (for example, malignant tumours) or secondary causes (for example, hypothyroidism) of dementia according to the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 3rd ed, revised (DSM-III-R)18 or biochemical criteria. Patients with large cerebral infarcts or multiple lacunas (except for the SAE group) were also excluded. All the included patients underwent a thorough clinical investigation, including medical history, physical, neurological and psychiatric examinations, screening laboratory tests of blood (relevant laboratory tests to exclude other causes of dementia for example, hypothyroidism), routine analysis of the CSF (for example, cytology), ECG, chest radiography, EEG, CT or MRI of the brain, investigation of regional cerebral blood flow, using either SPECT or a133Xe inhalation technique (Cortexplorer).19Diagnosis of FTD was according to the Lund/Manchester criteria (core diagnostic features)20 as previously described.21 None of the patients with FTD had signs of infarcts, and only mild white matter changes were found in some patients with FTD. The diagnosis of AD was made by exclusion, in accordance with the NINCDS-ADRDA criteria.22 The patients with AD were divided into one group with probable AD and another with possible AD, as defined by the NINCDS-ADRDA criteria. The patients with SAE were all referred to a neurological unit specialised in normal pressure hydrocephalus-SAE investigations. The diagnostic criteria for SAE were all of the following: (a) mental deterioration (predominantly asthenoemotional disorder and frontal cognitive dysfunction); (b) gait disturbance (ataxia and/or motor dysfunction); (c) focal neurological signs; (d) vascular risk factors such as hypertension and diabetes or presence of systemic vascular disease; (e) at MRI or CT, bilateral multiple or diffuse subcortical–paraventricular deep white matter changes (>2 mm), lacunar infarctions, an enlarged ventricular system, and maximum one cortical infarction. The criteria were compatible with those suggested by other studies.23Fifteen of the patients with SAE had no cortical infarction, the remaining four had one. The diagnosis of PD was made in accordance with established clinical and research criteria.24 All the patients with PD showed at least two of the three features bradykinesia, rigidity, and resting tremor, and all were responsive to levodopa treatment. No patients with PD showed any signs of dementia, and they all had a mini mental state examination (MMSE)25score of 27 or above. All the clinical diagnoses were made by physicians without knowledge of the results of the biochemical analyses and vice versa. None of the patients were currently treated for dementia (for example, with cholinesterase inhibitors). In the demented patients, the degree of dementia was evaluated using the MMSE.25 The control group consisted of subjects without history, symptoms, or signs of psychiatric or neurological disease, malignant disease, or systemic disorders (for example, rheumatoid arthritis, infectious disease). The MMSE was used to evaluate their cognitive status, and those with scores below 28 were excluded. The ethics committee of Göteborg University approved the study. All the patients (or their next of kin) and controls gave their informed consent to participate in the study, which was conducted in accordance with the provisions of the Helsinki Declaration.
Lumbar puncture was performed in all the patients and controls. The first 12 ml CSF was collected in polypropylene tubes and gently mixed to avoid gradient effects.26 At the same time, a serum sample was taken. All CSF samples with more than 500 erythrocytes/μl were excluded. The CSF and serum samples were centrifuged at 2000 g for 10 minutes to eliminate cells and other insoluble material. Aliquots were then stored at −80°C until biochemical analysis. Quantitative determination of serum and CSF albumin was performed by nephelometry, using a Behring Nephelometer Analyzer (Behringwerke AG, Marburg, Germany). The albumin ratio was calculated as CSF albumin (mg/l)/serum albumin (g/l) and was used as a measure of blood-brain barrier function.27 CSF tau was determined using a sandwich ELISA (Innotest hTAU-Ag, Innogenetics, Gent, Belgium), constructed to measure total tau (both normal tau and phosphorylated tau), as described previously in detail.5 7 The phosphotau (P-Thr181) ELISA was essentially designed as the Innotest hTau antigen ELISA, using the same reagents. Briefly, monoclonal antibody (MAb) HT7, which recognises both normal tau and phosphotau, was used as capturing antibody and biotinylated MAb AT270 (specific to P-Thr181 phosphotau) as detection antibody.28
DETERMINATION OF ApoE ISOFORMS
Depending on the sample material available, determination of ApoE isoforms was performed either by isoelectric focusing and western blotting with minor modifications29 30 or by polymerised chain reaction and reverse DNA hybridisation using the Innolipa ApoE kit (Innogenetics, Ghent, Belgium).
CHARACTERISATION OF TAU IN THE CSF
To characterise tau protein in CSF, the CSF samples from patients with AD were used. All the CSF samples had a normal cell count, a normal CSF/serum albumin ratio (normal blood-brain barrier function), no signs of intrathecal IgG or IgM production, and CSF tau concentrations above 700 ng/ml. The CSF samples were pooled and stored at −80°C before biochemical analysis. The MAbs for tau protein were generated using tau purified from bovine brain (BT2), normal human brain (HT7), and Alzheimer human brain (AT8, AT120, AT180, and AT 270) as antigen.31 32 MAb BT2 recognises only unphosphorylated tau protein,31 33 MAbs HT7 and AT120 both recognise unphosphorylated and phosphorylated tau equally well,5 33 34 and MAbs AT8, AT180, and AT270 all are phosphorylation dependent.31 33 35 Liquid phase immunelectropheresis was performed with some modifications of experimental procedures, which have been described previously in detail.36 37 Human CSF (80 ml) was concentrated fivefold and dialysed (molecular weight cut off 7000) against distilled water. After dialysis, urea (final concentration 6 M) and dithioerythritol (final concentration 20 mM) were added, followed by carrier ampholytes (Biolyte ampholytes pH range 3–10, Bio-Rad) added to a concentration of 2.5% and the volume was brought up to 18 ml with distilled water. The Rotofor apparatus (Bio-Rad) was used in compliance with the manufacturer's instruction. The sample (18 ml) was loaded into the mini Rotofor cell for initial fractionation in a wide range pH gradient (pH 3–10). Constant power (10 W) was applied for 4 hours with the system cooled to 4°C. Twenty separate isoelectric focusing fractions were rapidly harvested and pH values were determined immediately. The presence of tau protein in the harvested Rotofor fractions was determined by western blotting using several antibodies to tau protein. A 300 μl aliquot of each Rotofor fraction was concentrated fivefold by vacuum centrifugation. The fractions were electrophoresed through a 10% NU-PAGE minigel using the MOPS buffer system (Novex). The proteins were transferred from the gel onto a polyvinyl difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Millipore) by a semi-dry technique using the NovaBlot System (Pharmacia) at 0.8 mA/cm2 for 40 minutes and were then blocked with 5% milk powder in phosphate buffered saline (58 mM Na2HPO42H20, 17 mM Na2PO4H20, 68 mM NaCl, pH 7.4), containing 0.05% Tween-20. The membrane was incubated overnight with MAbs to tau protein (HT7, BT2, AT120, AT270, AT8), diluted to 1 pg/ml. After washing, the membrane was incubated with alkaline phosphatase conjugated goat antimouse antibody (Jackson) diluted 1/3000 for 1 hour and the colour reaction was developed with 0.015% 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate and 0.030% nitro blue tetrazolium in 0.1 M carbonate buffer containing 1.0 mM MgCl2.38 For detection of the biotinylated antibodies (HT7), the membrane was incubated with alkaline phosphatase conjugated extravidin (Sigma).
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS FOR THE GROUP COMPARISONS
All the variables were normally distributed and therefore parametric statistics were used for group comparisons of the effect variables (CSF tau and CSF phosphotau). A fully factorial multiple analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed with CSF tau and CSF phosphotau as dependent variables, age, duration and severity of dementia as covariates, and diagnostic category (probable and possible AD, FTD, PD, SAE, and normal aging) as factor. Factors that did not contribute to the variance were excluded from the analysis and recalculation was performed. Post hoc comparisons were performed using Tukey's post hoc test for unequal numbers. Pearson's χ2test was used for comparisons of ApoE4 allele frequency between the groups. Pearson's correlation test was used for calculation of correlations. For the calculation of the sensitivity and specificity of CSF tau and CSF phosphotau, a cut off was determined at the mean value +2 SD in the control group.39
The mean age was significantly lower in PD (p<0.001) and probable AD (p<0.05) compared with possible AD. The patients with probable AD were significantly more demented than those with possible AD (p<0.05). No differences were found between any of the patient or control groups for the CSF/serum albumin ratio (for the dementia groups only) and sex (table 1). CSF tau was significantly increased in probable AD and possible AD compared with FTD (p<0.001), SAE (p<0.001), PD (p<0.001), and controls (p<0.001) and in FTD compared with SAE (p<0.01, table 2 and fig 1). A specificity of 95% (cut off 12.5 pM) gave a sensitivity of 85.4% for probable AD and 84.2% for possible AD. Furthermore, it separated AD from FTD with a specificity of 88.9%, SAE 100%, and PD 100%. CSF phosphotau was significantly increased in probable AD compared with FTD (p<0.001), SAE (p<0.001), PD (p<0.001), and controls (p<0.001) and in possible AD compared with FTD (p<0.001) and SAE (p<0.001), but not compared with controls. Furthermore, CSF phosphotau was also significantly decreased in FTD (p<0.05) and SAE (p<0.05) compared with controls (table 2 and fig 2). A specificity of 95% (cut off 22.6 pM) gave a sensitivity of 43.9% for probable AD and 26.3% for possible AD. Furthermore, it separated AD from FTD with a specificity of 100%, SAE 94.1%, and PD 100%. CSF tau and CSF phosphotau were positively correlated in all diagnostic groups (probable and possible AD r=0.86, p<0.001; FTDr=0.66, p<0.01; SAEr=0.58, p<0.05; PDr=0.62, p<0.05; controls r=0.65; p<0.01, fig 3). No significant differences in the CSF concentrations of tau and phosphotau were found between the patients possessing and those lacking the ApoE4 allele when calculating each group separately (AD, ApoE4 allele positive v ApoE4 allele negative: CSF tau 20.1(7.1) v 17.2 (6.6); CSF phosphotau 21.9 (8.3) v 21.1(8.3)). The ApoE4 allele was found in 73% of patients with probable AD, 42% of patients with possible AD, 46% of patients with FTD, and in 8% of controls. Information on the presence of ApoE4 alleles in SAE and PD was not available. In probable AD, a negative correlation was found between age and CSF tau (r=−0.37, p<0.05) and between age at onset and CSF tau (r=−0.35, p<0.05). In PD, a positive correlation was found between age and the albumin ratio (r=0.42, p<0.01). The pooled CSF sample used for characterisation of tau had a volume of 80 ml and contained about 300 mg/l albumin. About 80% of the proteins were albumin and immunoglobulins and the other 20% a complex mixture of proteins, each present in CSF in a low concentration, as shown by the silver staining of the isoelectric focusing fractions (fig 4). The initial concentration of tau was 700 ng/ml, as measured by a specific sandwich ELISA. Western blot analysis of the isoelectric focusing fractions indicated that most of the proteins were focused in fractions 6–12, corresponding to a pH range of 6.5–8.5. Western blot analysis of the Rotofor fractions demonstrated two immunoreactive bands with molecular weights of 25 kDa and 52 kDa and several bands with molecular weights in the range of 65–80 kDa. Omission of the primary antibodies (using only the secondary antibody) gave no visible bands on the blots. The former bands were stained by all five MAbs (fig 5). The immunoreactive bands in the range of 65–80 kDa were detected using HT7, AT120, AT270, and AT8 antibodies, but they were not detected using the BT2 antibody (fig 5).
The results of the present study suggest that both CSF tau and CSF phosphotau are increased in AD but not in FTD, SAE, PD, or normal aging. The finding of high CSF tau in AD is in agreement with several previous studies.11 39 40 The finding of increased CSF phosphotau in AD is also in agreement with previous studies.7 41 However, ELISAs specific to different phosphorylated epitopes on tau have been used in these studies. One study used an ELISA reacting with both P-Thr181 and P-Thr231,7 whereas another study used an ELISA specific to P-Thr23141 and the present study used an ELISA specific to P-Thr181. Thus, both total tau and tau phosphorylated at different epitopes have been shown to be increased in the CSF in AD. To further examine the nature of tau in CSF, we used five different anti-tau antibodies, directed against both phosphorylated and unphosphorylated epitopes. All five antibodies labelled two immunoreactive bands of ∼52 kDa and 25 kDa, suggesting that these two bands contain both phosphorylated and unphosphorylated tau. The higher molecular weight bands of ∼65–80 kDa were not reactive to the BT2 antibody, which only recognises unphosphorylated tau, suggesting that the higher molecular weight bands in the CSF contain phosphorylated isoforms of tau. Normal tau demonstrated an apparent molecular weight of 48–68 kDa in human brain. The CSF-tau isoforms migrating at 52 kDa and 65–80 kDa occur in both CSF and postmortem brain. The low molecular weight of the tau isoform migrating at 25 kDa suggests that this form of tau is truncated, and the finding that all the antibodies recognised it suggests that it contains an internal domain of the intact protein. The nature of tau in CSF has not been well documented. Previous studies have found inconsistent results for the molecular weight of tau in the CSF in AD, with variations such as 68 kDa,42 55 kDa,11 three bands of 50–65 kDa,6 one band of 26–28 kDa43 in lumbar CSF, and several bands in the range of 30∼50 kDa in ventricular CSF.44 These differences may reflect technical differences including the use of different tau antibodies. Further, the low concentrations of tau in the CSF make detection difficult. As neuron specific proteins are present in the pg/ml range, it is uncertain whether western blot positive proteins can be detected in 50 μl CSF. One study used 6 ml CSF for western blot,11 and another used 3–50 μl CSF.44 Immunoprecipitated CSF has also been used to detect tau in CSF.43 We were unable to detect tau by western blotting alone, even after concentration of the CSF. For analysis of proteins present in trace concentrations, elimination of plasma proteins, especially albumin, by different chromatographic or electrophoretic methods may greatly enhance the sensitivity for CNS specific proteins and decrease non-specific binding.36 37The major advantage of liquid phase isoelectric focusing is that it enables the detection of low abundance proteins, such as tau in CSF.37 We determined whether the increases in CSF tau and CSF phosphotau occurred early in the course of the disease in AD. Our finding of no correlation between degree of dementia and CSF tau or CSF phosphotau suggests that the increases in tau and phosphotau are initial events in the pathogenesis of AD and may thus be regarded as trait markers rather than markers of the state of disease. CSF tau was normal and CSF phosphotau decreased in FTD. This suggests that the neuronal and axonal damage is more limited in FTD than in AD or, possibly, that the location of the pathology in the frontal lobe in FTD is less well reflected by CSF analyses than the temporoparietal and especially the medial temporal pathology in AD. Decreased CSF phosphotau concentrations may possibly be explained by disturbances in the mechanisms that regulate the phosphorylation of tau and this has to be investigated further. Moreover, this also suggests that CSF tau and CSF phosphotau may be used to improve the differential diagnosis of FTD from AD. However, previous studies using only CSF tau have presented discrepant results, showing either increased7 12 13 or normal CSF tau concentrations in FTD.14 15 The cause of the discrepant results is difficult to explain. As all these studies were clinical and thus no or only few neuropathological diagnoses have been established, misdiagnosis might have influenced the results. Alternative explanations include methodological differences. The CSF concentrations of tau was normal in SAE, in agreement with some previous studies of patients with vascular dementia,6 9but at variance with other studies that have found increased tau concentrations.7 37 As none of the patients with SAE in the present study had single stroke related dementia, the reported increased tau concentrations may be due to extensive axonal damage produced by major stroke events. Furthermore, the CSF concentrations of both tau and phosphotau in SAE showed a low variance, which might be a reflection of the increased distribution volume of CSF, resulting in the enlarged ventricles, preferentally found in patients with SAE. The latter may also explain why CSF phosphotau was decreased in SAE, but it may also be due to disturbances in the mechanisms that regulate the phosphorylation of tau. In PD, the normal concentrations of both CSF tau and CSF phosphotau are in agreement with previous reports7 15 45 and suggest pathophysiological discrepancies between the common neurodegenerative disorders AD and PD. Furthermore, as both CSF tau and CSF phosphotau separated AD from PD, they may be used in the differential diagnosis between these disorders. No differences in CSF tau or CSF phosphotau were found between patients with AD possessing and those lacking the ApoE4 allele, suggesting that ApoE4, although it is a risk factor for AD, does not affect the expression of tau or the shedding of tau to the CSF in AD. The mechanism for the increase in both CSF tau and CSF phosphotau is unclear. Studies on brain homogenates in AD have found increased cortical concentrations of phosphotau,31 42 46 47 50 51 but reduced concentrations of normal tau.48 49 51 These findings are also consistent with studies reporting that the tau mRNA concentration is unchanged in AD,52 53 altogether suggesting that hyperphosphorylation of tau rather than an increased synthesis of tau protein is one of the preponderant pathophysiological mechanisms in AD. One possible explanation is that, as a result of the neuronal/axonal degeneration in AD, both normal tau and phosphotau are shed into the CSF from degenerating neurons, resulting in increased CSF concentrations of both forms of tau. The high correlation between CSF tau and CSF phosphotau supports this suggestion, which also is concordant with the findings in AD brain, as discussed above. However, it should be remembered that the methods used to determine CSF tau and CSF phosphotau are not directly comparable, as they use different antibodies for detection of the protein in question. Interestingly, the electrophoretic mobility of phosphotau in the brain differs between AD and Pick's disease (one of the FTD disorders), with a triplet of 55, 64, and 69 kDa in AD and a doublet of 55 and 64 kDa in Pick's disease. Further, smears of tau aggregates are always found in AD but are absent in FTD.4 The isoelectric point also differs between AD and Pick's disease, further supporting the idea that tau in these disorders is differentially phosphorylated.4 Thus, it is possible that ELISAs specific to other phosphorylated epitopes of tau may show more differences between AD and FTD. Taken together, increased CSF concentrations of tau and phosphotau are found in two thirds of patients with probable AD and in about half of those with possible AD, but normal concentrations are found in FTD, PD, and SAE compared with normal aging. This probably reflects that different pathophysiological mechanisms are active in the various neurodegenerative disorders. Values in the normal range do not exclude AD. Further studies are needed to explore the diagnostic and pathogenic potential of CSF phosphotau measurements.
This work was supported by grants from Alzheimerfonden; Bohuslandstingets FoU fond; Fredrik och Ingrid Thurings Stiftelse; Martina och Wilhelm Lundgrens Stiftelse; Stiftelsen för Gamla Tjänarinnor; Stiftelsen Handlanden Hjalmar Svenssons Forskningsfond; Stiftelsen Lars Hiertas Minne; Lundbeckfonden; and the Swedish Medical Society; the Swedish Medical Research Council (grants 12103, 11560, 12769, 13121 and 09946). We are grateful to Mrs Ewa Styrud and Maria Lindbjer for technical assistance.