Two patients are described with the callosal type of alien hand syndrome. Both presented with abnormal feelings in the left upper limb and intermanual conflict without clinical evidence of callosal apraxia or frontal lobe dysfunction such as motor deficit or reflexive grasping. Imaging studies disclosed subacute infarction in the body and splenium of the corpus callosum due to pericallosal artery disease. These patients were unique in their presentation as a callosal type of alien hand syndrome secondary to ischaemic stroke.
- alien hand syndrome
- ischaemic stroke
- anterior cerebral artery
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Alien hand syndrome is a fascinating but controversial clinical entity. Brion and Jedynak, in 1972, first described three patients with tumour of the corpus callosum who failed to recognise ownership of one hand when it was placed into the other hand behind the back and introduced the concept of the alien hand (la main étrangere).1 Subsequently, the term has been applied to a motor phenomena of apparently purposeful actions of one hand against the patient's intention.2 Perception disturbance, which makes this syndrome unique, is always verbally expressed, even expression of astonishment at the autonomous activities of the alien hand may occur. Neuroimaging and pathological studies demonstrated that the frontal lobe and corpus callosum are the most common anatomical lesions responsiible for this distinctive phenomenon.3, 4 Here, we describe the clinical, neuroanatomical, and radiological findings of two patients who presented with the callosal type of alien hand syndrome. The isolated manifestation of intermanual conflict without evidence of callosal apraxia and forced grasping makes our patients substantially different from those previously described. On neuroradiological studies, both patients had infarction restricted to the corpus callosum secondary to stenosis of the supracallosal segment of the pericallosal artery.
This patient was a 54 year old right handed Thai man who presented with abnormal feelings in his arms. His medical history included diabetes mellitus and hypertension which had been poorly controlled. The symptoms had started while he was sitting, when he suddenly experienced transient weakness of the lower limbs, which lasted for only 5 minutes. Ten hours later, he noticed some strange feelings in his arms. For example, when he crossed his arms behind his back, he felt as if the right hand was touched by a foreign hand. The feeling disappeared when he placed both hands in the front. When he reached into his pocket with his left hand, he felt as if there was another, non-existing, hand touching it. When he held a paper with both hands, the left hand would try to pull the paper against the right. Some actions indicating mirror movement were also seen. For example, when he moved his right hand backwards, he felt that the left hand was pulled back in the same manner. On examination, he was alert. Motor power of the arms and legs was full. There was no pinprick sensory loss or inattention, on double simultaneous stimulation test. Proprioceptive sense was normal. He could not identify his left hand fingers or objects placed in his left hand with his eyes closed, but was able to do so under visual observation. There was no apraxia of the left hand on verbal command, in imitation, and in actual object use. Frontal lobe releasing signs such as reflexive grasping, palmomental reflex, and snout reflex were absent.
Brain MRI on admission showed lesions with hyposignal intensity on T1 weighted and hypersignal intensity on T2 weighted and FLAIR images in the body and splenium of the corpus callosum. There was no associated frontal lobe lesion. The diffusion weighted study showed increased signal intensity of the involved area (fig 1 A and B). Magnetic resonance angiography of the cerebral vessels showed a variation of the anterior cerebral artery, with only a single trunk of pericallosal branches. Stenosis and irregularity of the supracallosal segment of the right pericallosal artery which could have been responsible for the callosal infarction was also demonstrated (fig 1 C).
This patient was a 50 year old right handed Thai woman with a history of diabetes mellitus, dyslipidaemia, and coronary artery disease. She was admitted for coronary artery bypass grafting. The operation went uneventfully without any immediate complications. On the 7th day postoperatively, she was noted by nursing staff to have mild slurring of speech. She also complained of loss of bimanual coordination. For example, she could not tie a rope by herself as the left hand would not help the right and at times even tried to inhibit the action. When she held a piece of paper with both hands, each hand would pull against each other. She also reported that the left hand would not release the telephone when she wanted to use it with her right hand. The intermanual conflict was so pronounced that she felt as if the left hand was under someone else's control. On neurological examination, she was alert and oriented. There was only mildly dysarthric speech. No evidence of motor aphasia was demonstrated. Hypaesthesia of the left side of her body and face was also noted. The motor power and tone were normal. She was able to release objects held in the left hand when asked by the examiner. Forced grasping and other frontal release signs were absent. Apraxia was absent, both on verbal command and patomime of object use. There was no tactile agnosia, agraphia, or alexia. Stereognosis was normal. Other general physical examination was within normal limits. Regarding the aetiology of stroke, there was no atrial fibrillation. An ECG showed a moderate aortic regurgitation without intracardiac clot. All of the neurological symptoms disappeared within 48 hours.
Brain MRI showed a region of low signal intensity in the right side of the body of the corpus callosum on the T1 weighted image and high signal intensity in the same area on T2 weighted and FLAIR images (fig 2 A). Diffusion weighted images also showed increased signal intensity at the same region (fig 2 B). Evidence of old lacunar infarction in the frontal and parietal subcortical white matter was noted in the T2 weighted and FLAIR images but not on the diffusion studies. There was no evidence of a frontal lobe lesion. Magnetic resonance angiography showed an absence of the A1 segment of the right anterior cerebral artery. Atherosclerotic narrowing of the cavernous portion of both internal carotid arteries and the proximal part of both middle cerebral arteries were noted. There was a significant stenosis of the supracallosal segment of the right pericallosal artery (fig 2 C).
The term “alien hand syndrome” has been used to describe two distinctive phenomena. Originally, it was proposed by Brion and Jedynac as a sensory phenomenon characterised by the denial of ownership of one hand despite no sensory loss when it was held by the other hand behind the back, secondary to lesions of the parietal lobe and posterior part of corpus callosum.1 Subsequently, the same term has become more recognised as a psychomotor disorder characterised by the patient's perception of alienation coexisting with observable involuntary, but seemingly purposeful, movement of the affected limb.5, 6 Motor phenomena of the alien hand syndrome vary from simple to complex and apparently purposeful movements. Recently, the term “anarchic hand” has been proposed to distinguish the motor phenomena of alien hand syndrome from the original description of sensory misperception.6 Both patients in this report presented with a predominantly motor type of alien hand syndrome. However, an associated sensory phenomenon similar to that originally described by Brion and Jedynak was shown in the first case.1
Two types of predominantly motor alien hand syndrome were proposed by Della Sala et al in 1991.7 The first type is an acute or transient form due to callosal lesions. The other more common form is a chronic condition resulting from both callosal and additional mesial frontal lesions. Feinberg et al reviewed the clinical characteristics and neuroanatomy of 20 reported cases of alien hand syndrome and categorised the alien hand syndrome into two distinct syndromes.8 The “frontal alien hand syndrome” results from damage to the supplementary motor area, anterior cingulate gyrus, medial prefrontal cortex of the dominant hemisphere, and anterior corpus callosum. The symptoms of frontal alien hand syndrome always occur in the dominant hand, with prominent motor phenomena including reflexive grasping, groping, and compulsive manipulation of tools. The second type or “callosal alien hand syndrome” requires only a callosal lesion and is characterised primarily by intermanual conflict and the non-dominant hand is usually affected. Clinically, our patients fulfilled the criteria for the callosal type of alien hand syndrome. The feeling of alienation, including intermanual conflict and mirror movement, was found in the left upper limb in both cases. Neuroimaging studies confirmed the responsible lesions for the interhemispheric motor disconnection syndrome in the corpus callosum. However, both patients did not manifest the profound callosal apraxia which has been previously reported with lesions in the body of the corpus callosum.6, 8
Many medical and surgical conditions can cause alien hand syndrome.9–17 For patients with alien hand syndrome secondary to ischaemic stroke, the anterior cerebral artery is almost always the affected vessel.7, 13–17 Anterior cerebral artery infarction is responsible for less than 3% of all ischaemic strokes,15 and alien hand syndrome is considered to be an uncommon manifestation.15 Among reported patients, the alien hand syndrome after anterior cerebral artery infarction is clinically frontal type with prominent reflexive grasping of the dominant hand and motor deficits suggesting frontal lobe dysfunction.7, 13–17 The responsible anatomical lesions are generally located in the corpus callosum and the neighbouring frontal lobe especially in the supplementary motor area. According to Giroud and Dumas, alien hand syndrome was found in only two out of eight patients with callosal infarction and both of these had hemiparesis and forced grasping which is characteristic of frontal alien hand syndrome.15 Our two patients each displayed the characteristic pattern of callosal alien hand syndrome. Their symptoms appeared in the non-dominant upper limbs and there was no obvious motor deficit or reflexive grasping.
These patients are unique in their manifestations and the imaging findings. Both demonstrated isolated corpus callosal lesions without evidence of cortical involvement on MRI during the acute phase. However, they initially displayed symptoms consistent with frontal lobe dysfunction. The first patient reported a transient weakness of both lower limbs whereas the second case had mild dysarthria. Therefore, it is possible that these patients sustained some degree of cortical damage in addition to the callosal lesion. Temporary ischaemia of the frontal lobe resulting in limited area of residual infarction on MRI may explain this phenomena. We were able to show the responsible vascular lesions at the pericallosal branch of anterior cerebral artery by magnetic resonance angiography. To our knowledge, there have been no previous reports documenting pericallosal artery disease as a cause of alien hand syndrome. In the first patient, variation of the pericallosal artery as a single trunk supplying both sides of the corpus callosum causing bilateral infarction was shown on MRI.18 The second patient had lesions in the right pericallosal artery resulting in infarction of the right side of the corpus callosum.