Article Text
Abstract
Objectives: To determine if cardiovascular disease may be a risk factor in the development of chronic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy (CIAP).
Methods: In this incidence case-control study, the prevalence of cardiovascular disease and risk factors in 97 patients with CIAP (mean age 67.5 (SD 7.9) years) and the prevalence of neuropathic features in 97 patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) (mean age 67.1 (SD 7.3) years) were investigated. The results were compared with those for 96 age and sex matched controls without diagnosed PAD or polyneuropathy (mean age 67.5 (SD 9.1) years). In a randomly chosen subgroup of 23 patients with CIAP, 42 patients with PAD, and 48 controls, an electrodiagnostic investigation was performed.
Results: Patients with CIAP more often had manifest cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular risk factors than controls (stroke 18% v 6% of patients, odds ratio (OR) 3.2 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.8 to 5.9); heart disease 29% v 15%, OR 2.4 (95% CI 1.2 to 4.9); family history of cardiovascular disease 42% v 21%, OR 2.8 (95% CI (1.5 to 5.2); hypertension 56% v 39%, OR 2.0 (95% CI 1.1 to 3.6); hypercholesterolaemia 46% v 21%, OR 3.3 (95% CI 1.5 to 7.3); current smoking 38% v 23%, OR 2.1 (95% CI 1.1 to 3.9)). The prevalence of cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular risk factors was lower than in patients with PAD. Patients with PAD more often had polyneuropathy than controls (15% v 5%, OR 3.3 (95% CI 1.1 to 10.0)). There was a trend towards lower nerve conduction velocities and lower amplitudes on electrodiagnostic investigation compared with controls.
Conclusion: This study shows that cardiovascular disease and CIAP often coexist, and therefore cardiovascular disease may be a cofactor in the development of CIAP.
- chronic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy
- peripheral arterial disease
- cardiovascular disease
- CIAP, chronic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy
- PAD, peripheral arterial disease
- TIA, transient ischaemic attack
- CMAP, compound muscle action potential
- SNAP, sensory nerve action potential
- BMI, body mass index
Statistics from Altmetric.com
- CIAP, chronic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy
- PAD, peripheral arterial disease
- TIA, transient ischaemic attack
- CMAP, compound muscle action potential
- SNAP, sensory nerve action potential
- BMI, body mass index
The prevalence of polyneuropathy is estimated to be between 2.4 and 8 per 1000.1,2 In 10–18% of patients, the cause of the polyneuropathy remains unknown, despite extensive evaluation.3,4 Most of these patients have a slowly progressive course. They share common clinical features: a relatively mild, predominantly sensory polyneuropathy with axonal degeneration, male predominance, and a mean age of onset of around 60 years.3,5–8 Although, by definition, patients with an unknown cause of polyneuropathy must form a heterogeneous group, considering the similarity in age and clinical features, these patients may share a common condition which causes or enhances the development of polyneuropathy. We have designated this condition chronic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy (CIAP).6 Recently a similar group has been described as chronic cryptogenic sensory polyneuropathy.8
Animal studies have shown that acute and chronic ischaemia can lead to peripheral nerve lesions.9–12 In several clinical conditions, a relation between ischaemia or hypoxia and polyneuropathy is assumed. In patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, a high incidence of polyneuropathy is found.13–16 In diabetes mellitus, several studies indicate that ischaemia and metabolic factors together cause diabetic neuropathy.17,18 Abnormalities in the blood vessel wall, which are seen in diabetic polyneuropathy,19 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,16 and PAD,14 were also found in patients with CIAP, being more prominent in those with manifest cardiovascular disease.20 These observations together with the similarity in age and sex distribution of patients with CIAP and those with cardiovascular disease led us to hypothesise that cardiovascular disease may play a role in the development of CIAP.
To investigate whether there is a relation between cardiovascular disease and polyneuropathy, we performed an incidence case-control study to compare the prevalence of cardiovascular disease, cardiovascular risk factors, and neuropathic features in 97 patients with CIAP, 97 patients with PAD, and 96 age and sex matched controls.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
The study was designed as a case-control study with incidence cases. Patients were seen between 1995 and 1998. In total, 97 patients with CIAP, 97 patients with PAD, and 96 controls matched for age and sex were included (table 1). The same investigator (LLT) examined all patients and controls. A standardised history focused on complaints suggesting neuropathy, cardiovascular disease, and risk factors for cardiovascular disease. All patients and controls gave their informed consent, and the committee for human research of the University Medical Centre Utrecht approved the protocol.
Polyneuropathy
In this study, polyneuropathy was clinically defined as the presence of tingling, numbness, or loss of strength in combination with the following abnormalities at neurological examination: a symmetrical diminished sense of pain or touch, more prominent in the feet than in the hands, and two of the following abnormalities: loss of vibration sense in the big toe, absent ankle jerks, and decreased muscle strength more prominent in the feet than in the hands. This definition was based on descriptions by us and others of a symmetrical polyneuropathy, more prominent in the distal part of the legs.8,21,22
Chronic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy (CIAP)
Patients were referred to the outpatient clinics of the neurology departments of the University Medical Centre, Utrecht (78 patients) and St Lucas Andreas Hospital, Amsterdam (19 patients). CIAP was diagnosed if patients had a slowly progressive distal symmetric chronic polyneuropathy that at least fulfilled the above definition. No cause for the polyneuropathy was found after extensive clinical and laboratory evaluation including a search for monoclonal proteins, metabolic, endocrine, malignant, or autoimmune diseases, exposure to toxic agents, or hereditary causes.6 In all 97 patients with CIAP, the results of the electrodiagnostic investigation were consistent with an axonal polyneuropathy.6 No evidence of demyelination was found according to our criteria,23 which are modified from those of the American Academy of Neurology.24 Electrodiagnostic investigation was performed in all patients to confirm the presence of an axonal polyneuropathy.6 In a subset of patients, a sural nerve biopsy was performed to exclude vasculitis and amyloidosis. The results of these biopsies were presented in an earlier paper.20
Peripheral arterial disease (PAD)
Patients with PAD, visiting the outpatient vascular clinics of the University Medical Centre, Utrecht (57 patients) and St Lucas Andreas Hospital, Amsterdam (40 patients) were studied. All patients had enduring lifestyle limiting complaints due to PAD. All patients with PAD had an ankle-brachial index (ABI) <0.90 and at least Fontaine stage II (pain after exercise). Medical charts of all patients were reviewed and an extensive history was taken. Patients with a disease that could cause polyneuropathy—for example, diabetes mellitus, thyroid disease, or alcohol abuse—were not included. Diabetes had to be excluded in all patients with PAD before they were entered in the study. We chose the patients with PAD in such a way that they matched for age and sex the patients with CIAP.
Controls
Because our patients formed a selected group who were visiting specialised outpatient clinics for neuromuscular diseases of a university hospital and general hospital, we did not take random controls, but chose as controls partners or acquaintances of our patients. Controls who had a disease that could cause polyneuropathy (see above) or who were diagnosed as having PAD were excluded. No other restrictions to inclusion were applied, meaning that controls could have undiagnosed polyneuropathy or PAD. We chose controls in such a way that they matched for age and sex the patients with CIAP.
Cardiovascular evaluation
Clinically manifest cardiovascular disease was defined as ischaemic heart disease—that is, ischaemic chest pain or myocardial infarction—or ischaemic cerebral disease—that is, transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or cerebral infarction. Risk factors for cardiovascular disease were defined as hypercholesterolaemia (serum cholesterol level >6.5 mmol/l or the use of cholesterol lowering agents), a positive family history (a first degree relative with cardiovascular disease at age <65 years), hypertension (use of antihypertensive drugs or a mean blood pressure over 95 diastolic and/or 160 systolic at two measurements), current daily smoking, and consumption of more than four glasses of alcohol a day. The ankle-brachial index was measured and used as an indicator of PAD. The ankle-brachial index is the ratio between the systolic blood pressure in the ankle and in the arm. An ankle-brachial index of over 1.00 is considered normal, and one below 0.90 at rest or after exercise was considered abnormal.25,26 Intermittent claudication was assessed according to the Rose criteria,27 and severity defined as follows: Fontaine stage I, subclinical PAD; II, pain after exercise; III, pain at rest; IV, ulceration.
Neurological evaluation
The neurological examination was performed according to a standardised protocol6: muscle strength, touch, pinprick, vibration, and joint position sense were measured in both arms and legs. The presence of atrophy of the intrinsic hand muscles and lower leg muscles was noted. A Romberg test was performed to measure stability. Ataxia was quantified by the tapping test for the dominant arm and leg as follows. A device consisting of two push buttons for the hands or two pedals for the feet was placed at a fixed distance of 35 cm and connected to an automatic counter.28 The patient had to alternately push buttons or pedals as fast as possible, and the number of hits in 15 seconds was counted. The vibration perception threshold was measured on the dominant metacarpal 2 using a Vibrameter type 3 (Somedic AB, Stockholm, Sweden).29 The modified Rankin scale was used to score disability.30
Electrodiagnostic investigation
In addition to the electrodiagnostic investigation performed in all 97 patients with CIAP, a randomly chosen subgroup of 23 patients with CIAP, 42 patients with PAD, and 48 controls underwent an electrodiagnostic investigation according to a standardised protocol.31 The limbs were warmed in water for 30 minutes before the investigation; thereafter skin temperature was maintained at 37°C.32 Nerve conduction studies were performed using surface electrodes by standard techniques.33 Motor nerve conduction was investigated up to the axilla in the median nerve (recording: abductor pollicis brevis muscle) and up to the popliteal fossa in the tibial nerve (recording: abductor hallucis brevis muscle); the distance between the distal stimulation point and the active recording electrode was 7 cm and 10 cm respectively. Antidromic sensory nerve conduction was investigated in the median nerve (recording with ring electrodes from the second digit) and in the sural nerve. F waves were elicited by 20 stimuli at the wrist or ankle. Concentric needle electromyography was performed in the tibialis anterior muscle. The following were scored: distal motor latency; motor conduction velocities in the lower arm, upper arm, and lower leg segments; amplitude, duration, and area of the negative part of the compound muscle action potential (CMAP); reduction of CMAP amplitude and area, and increase in CMAP duration after distal compared with proximal stimulation of each segment; minimal F-M latency; sensory conduction velocities and amplitude of the negative part of the sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) after distal stimulation; presence of fibrillations or positive sharp waves on concentric needle electromyography.
Statistical analysis
Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated to assess differences between groups. ORs were considered significant if the 95% CI did not include 1.0. The means of the electrodiagnostic variables, vibration threshold, and tapping test results were compared with the Mann-Whitney U test for non-parametric values. Results were considered significant if p<0.05.
RESULTS
Cardiovascular history and examination
Patients with CIAP compared with controls
Overall, 17% of patients with CIAP had suffered from a stroke (9% TIA, 8% cerebral infarction) and 28% from ischaemic heart disease (13% ischaemic chest pain, 15% myocardial infarction), compared with 6% with strokes (3% TIA, 3% cerebral infarction) and 15% with ischaemic heart disease (8% ischaemic chest pain, 7% myocardial infarction) in controls. All investigated variables of cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular risk factors were significantly more common in patients with CIAP than in controls, except for an abnormal ankle-brachial index after exercise, body mass index (BMI), and whether the subject had ever smoked, which did not show a significant difference, and use of alcohol, which was significantly less common in patients with CIAP (table 1). None of the patients with CIAP or controls admitted consuming more than four glasses of alcohol a day.
Patients with PAD compared with controls
Overall, 18% of patients with PAD had suffered from a stroke (11% TIA, 7% cerebral infarction) and 44% from ischaemic heart disease (22% ischaemic chest pain, 22% myocardial infarction). All investigated variables of cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular risk factors were significantly more common in patients with PAD than in controls, except for BMI, which did not show a significant difference, and use of alcohol, which was significantly less common in patients with PAD (table 1). None of the patients with PAD admitted consuming more than four glasses of alcohol a day.
Patients with CIAP compared with patients with PAD
Although all investigated variables except family history of cardiovascular diseases and alcohol use were more common in patients with PAD than in those with CIAP, only smoking (current and ever) reached a significant level (table 1).
Neurological history and examination
Patients with CIAP compared with controls
All investigated neuropathic symptoms and signs were significantly more common in patients with CIAP than in controls (table 2). Although neuropathic features were often present in controls, only 5% fulfilled the defined criteria of polyneuropathy.
Patients with PAD compared with controls
All investigated neuropathic symptoms and signs were significantly more common in patients with PAD than in controls, except for complaints of muscle weakness, atrophy of the intrinsic muscles of the hand, absent biceps, triceps, knee, and ankle jerk, abnormal pin prick and touch sense (table 2). Fifteen percent of patients with PAD fulfilled the defined criteria of polyneuropathy.
Patients with PAD compared with patients with CIAP
All investigated neuropathic symptoms and signs were significantly more common in patients with CIAP than in patients with PAD, except for complaints of pain, Rankin score, and the tapping test of the arm (table 2). By definition, all patients with CIAP fulfilled the criteria of polyneuropathy.
Electrodiagnostic investigation
Sex and age distribution in the subgroup of patients who underwent the standardised electrodiagnostic investigation were comparable to the total group (CIAP: 78% men, mean age 65.9 (SD 6.7) years; PAD: 71% men, 67.0 (SD 10.5) years; controls: 65% men, 67.5 (SD 6.6) years). The number of patients with severe PAD (Fontaine stage III or IV) was smaller than the total group of patients with PAD (CIAP: 17% Fontaine stage I; PAD: 88% stage II, 7% stage III, 5% stage IV; controls: 2% stage I).
Patients with CIAP compared with controls
All variables were significantly worse in patients with CIAP than in controls, except for the sural nerve conduction velocity (table 3).
Patients with PAD compared with controls
There was a trend towards worse values for all variables in patients with PAD, in comparison with controls. However, only the median nerve motor conduction velocity in the lower arm and the tibial nerve motor conduction velocity, minimal F-M latency of the median nerve, and SNAP amplitude of the sural nerve were significantly worse in patients with PAD than in controls (table 3).
Patients with CIAP compared with patients with PAD
The variables in patients with CIAP were all significantly worse than in patients with PAD, except for the median nerve CMAP amplitude after stimulation at the wrist and the sural nerve conduction velocity. None of the patients or controls had evidence of demyelination according to our criteria.
DISCUSSION
In this study, cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular risk factors were significantly more common in patients with CIAP, and neuropathic features were significantly more common in patients with PAD, compared with non-disease controls. Because patients were referred because of polyneuropathy of unknown cause and not because of other conditions, we presumed that cardiovascular disease did not form a selection bias. Because most patients with CIAP had mild complaints (Rankin 1 or 2), we thought it unlikely that the number of cardiovascular risk factors was increased by inactivity or increased body weight caused by general disease or pain. There were no differences in BMI between the groups. The numbers of patients with CIAP and controls who had ever smoked were similar, meaning that this did not form a selection bias. Because our patients formed a selected population, we decided to choose partners and acquaintances as controls instead of random controls.
In experimental models, chronic ischaemia can lead to axonal degeneration.10–12 Clinical and morphological signs of neuropathy have been found in patients with PAD, related toseverity of ischaemia.13–15 These studies emphasise neurophysiological and morphological findings, and the clinical studies lack comparisons with normal controls and polyneuropathy controls. A high prevalence of polyneuropathy has also been found in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, possibly related to hypoxia.16 In diabetes mellitus, there is evidence that ischaemia, along with metabolic factors, plays a role in the development of diabetic neuropathy.17,18 PAD aggravates diabetic neuropathy,34,35 and the incidence of diabetic neuropathy is higher in the presence of cardiovascular risk factors.36,37 Reduction in the endoneurial blood flow,10,11 hypotension,38 hypoxia of the blood,12,16 and abnormalities in the blood vessel wall19 can all lead to insufficient oxygenation of peripheral nerves. Abnormalities of epineurial and endoneurial vessel walls are seen in several conditions, of which diabetes,19 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,16 and PAD13,14 are ones in which ischaemia and hypoxia play a role. These abnormalities are thought to hamper oxygen transport and change the blood/nerve barrier. Abnormalities of the endoneurial vessel wall are also seen in sural nerve biopsy specimens of patients with CIAP, and were more prominent in patients with CIAP who had (subclinical) PAD.20
In our study, patients with PAD showed abnormalities suggestive of axonal degeneration on electrodiagnostic examination, but less commonly than in patients with CIAP. In earlier studies, slight slowing of conduction velocity and decreased SNAP and CMAP amplitudes were found in patients with PAD.15,39 In our study, the differences between patients and controls were smaller than in earlier studies, probably because in our study patients had less severe PAD. Furthermore, in our protocol,32 limbs were warmed in water, which may have improved the conduction velocity. Neuropathic features were also detected in the control group, and five cases even fulfilled our criteria for polyneuropathy. A higher prevalence of polyneuropathy has been reported in an elderly general population,1 and the loss of ankle reflexes and diminished vibration sense at the hallux increase with age.40 Moreover, we did not incorporate severity or duration of complaints into our criteria.
We conclude that cardiovascular disease may be a risk factor for the development of CIAP. The common concurrence of CIAP with cardiovascular disease and the presence of neuropathic features in patients with PAD suggest that our results are more than a confounder. However, the less common and less severe presence of neuropathic features in patients with PAD suggests that, as well as vascular disease, other unknown factors play an important role in the development of CIAP, and that CIAP has a multifactorial origin, with factors such as genetic disposition, aging, and lifestyle influencing the development of axonal degeneration.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr A Voorwinde for referring patients with peripheral arterial disease and Dr G Wieneke for help with analysis of the electrophysiological data.