Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Home based management in multiple sclerosis: results of a randomised controlled trial
  1. C Pozzilli1,
  2. M Brunetti2,
  3. A M V Amicosante2,
  4. C Gasperini3,
  5. G Ristori1,
  6. L Palmisano4,
  7. M Battaglia4
  1. 1Dipartimento di Scienze Neurologiche, Università “La Sapienza”, Rome, Italy
  2. 2Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche “Mario Negri”, Milan
  3. 3Dipartimento di Neurologia, Ospedale San Camillo-Forlanini, Rome
  4. 4Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla, Rome
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr C Pozzilli, Dipartimento di Scienze Neurologiche, Università “La Sapienza”, Viale dell'Università 30, 00185 Rome, Italy;
 carlo.pozzilli{at}uniroma1.it

Abstract

Background: Home based medical care is a popular alternative to standard hospital care but there is uncertainty about its cost-effectiveness.

Objectives: To compare the effectiveness and the costs of multidisciplinary home based care in multiple sclerosis with hospital care in a prospective randomised controlled trial with a one year follow up.

Methods: 201 patients with clinically definite multiple sclerosis were studied. They were randomised in a ratio 2:1 to an intervention group (133) or a control group (68). They were assessed at baseline and one year after randomisation with validated measures of physical and psychological impairment and quality of life (SF-36 health survey). The costs to the National Health Service over the one year follow up were calculated by a cost minimisation analysis.

Results: There were no differences in functional status between the home based care group and the hospital group. There was a significant difference between the two groups favouring home based management in four SF-36 health dimensions—general health, bodily pain, role-emotional, and social functioning (all p ≤ 0.001). The cost of home based care was slightly less (822 euros/patient/year) than hospital care, mainly as a result of a reduction in hospital admissions.

Conclusions: Comprehensive planning of home based intervention implemented by an interdisciplinary team and designed specifically for people with multiple sclerosis may provide a cost-effective approach to management and improve the quality of life.

  • home based management
  • multiple sclerosis
  • quality of life
  • costs
  • CDQ, clinical depression questionnaire
  • EDSS, expanded disability status score
  • FIM, functional independence measure
  • FSS, fatigue severity scale
  • MCS, mental component score
  • MMSE, mini-mental state examination
  • PCS, physical component score
  • SF-36, 36 item short form health survey questionnaire
  • STAI, state trait anxiety inventory
  • STAXI, state trait anger expression inventory

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: none declared.