Article Text

Download PDFPDF
“Bottom-up” and “top-down” effects on reading saccades: a case study
  1. N J Upton1,
  2. T L Hodgson2,
  3. G T Plant3,
  4. R J S Wise4,
  5. A P Leff4
  1. 1Department of Human Sciences, Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middlesex UB8 2HG, UK; MRC Clinical Sciences Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, London W12 0NN, UK
  2. 2School of Psychology, University of Exeter, Washington Singer Laboratories, Prince of Wales Road, Exeter EX4 4QG, UK
  3. 3Department of Neuro-ophthalmology, Moorfields Eye Hospital, City Road, London EC1V 2PD, UK
  4. 4Division of Neuroscience and Psychological Medicine, Imperial College School of Medicine, Charing Cross Hospital, London W6 8RF, UK; MRC Clinical Sciences Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, London W12 0NN, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
 N J Upton
 Department of Human Sciences, Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middlesex UB8 2HG, UK; nat.uptonbrunel.ac.uk

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the role right foveal/parafoveal sparing plays in reading single words, word arrays, and eye movement patterns in a single case with an incongruous hemianopia.

Methods: The patient, a 48 year old right handed male with a macular sparing hemianopia in his left eye and a macular splitting hemianopia in his right eye, performed various reading tasks. Single word reading speeds were monitored using a “voice-trigger” system. Eye movements were recorded while reading three passages of text, and PET data were gathered while the subject performed a variety of reading tasks in the camera.

Results: The patient was faster at reading single words and text with his left eye compared with his right. A small word length effect was present in his right eye but not his left. His eye movement patterns were more orderly when reading text with his left eye, making fewer saccades. The PET data provided evidence of “top-down” processes involved in reading. Binocular single word reading produced activity in the representation of foveal V1 bilaterally; however, text reading with the left eye only was associated with activation in left but not right parafoveal V1, despite there being visual stimuli in both visual fields.

Conclusions: The presence of a word length effect (typically associated with pure alexia) can be caused by a macular splitting hemianopia. Right parafoveal vision is not critically involved in single word identification, but is when planning left to right reading saccades. The influence of top-down attentional processes during text reading can be visualised in parafoveal V1 using PET.

  • hemianopia
  • reading
  • saccades
  • PET
  • visual attention
  • LGN, lateral geniculate nucleus
  • SEM, saccadic eye movement
  • RT, response time

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: none declared