Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Effect of deprivation on time to hospital in acute stroke
  1. M R Macleod,
  2. S C Lewis,
  3. M S Dennis
  1. Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK; malcolm{at}

    Statistics from

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Acute stroke is the leading neurological cause of death and disability. After years of therapeutic nihilism there is now some optimism that effective treatments might become more widely available. It appears likely that very early thrombolysis is of benefit,1 and there is good evidence for the use of aspirin.2 As well as gains from the early initiation of these “disease modifying” treatments, it is likely that early admission to a safe clinical environment, with attention to simple physiological variables such as temperature and blood glucose, will improve outcome.3 For these reasons, it seems probable that the time taken for patients to reach hospital following stroke onset will have a significant effect on outcome.

    We have shown higher rates of intensive care admission for epilepsy, stroke, or head injury among individuals from affluent areas.4 The impact of social deprivation on disease management might result from biases within health care systems, or from differences in how individuals perceive disease and access health care systems, and in particular how quickly they access care.

    As acute stroke services are developed to meet the challenges ahead, any impact of deprivation on the delay to treatment should be identified. We have examined time to hospital admission by deprivation category for patients enrolled in the Lothian stroke registry (LSR).


    The LSR prospectively identified stroke patients admitted to the medical unit of our hospital (excluding those with subarachnoid haemorrhage), and all patients were assessed by a stroke physician. We extracted time of symptom onset and of hospital admission; home postcode; computed tomography (CT) findings; and whether symptoms were first apparent on waking from sleep. Carstairs DepCat scores5 were determined from the home postcode and, to maximise statistical power, patients were grouped into approximate quartiles of deprivation (DepCats 1 and 2; 3; 4; and 5–7). Prespecified analyses were the proportion of patients reaching hospital within three hours of symptom onset by deprivation quartile, CT findings, and whether symptoms were present on waking. During the period of this study there were considerable developments in the provision of in-hospital stroke services, and for this reason analysis of the proportion of patients from each deprivation quartile admitted to a stroke unit were though likely to be unreliable.

    Data were obtained for Lothian for mean general practitioner list size (1999; Lothian Health Board, personal communication), for mean ambulance response times (2000; Scottish Ambulance Service, personal communication), and for mean distance to hospital (derived from the distance “as the crow flies” from the centre of each postcode sector to the centre of the postcode sector in which the hospital lies, using online mapping tools ( The Information and Statistics Department of the Scottish Health Service provided data for hospital admissions and for death by deprivation category for patients with a main diagnosis of stroke (ICD 9 codes (to March 1996) 430–438; ICD 10 codes (from April 1996) I60–I69, G450, G451, G458, G459) for the years 1995 to 1999, and from these, age and sex adjusted rates of admission and death were calculated. This analysis was restricted to persons under 80 years of age because of concerns regarding the accuracy of death certification data among the very elderly.

    Of 1927 patients, data on time to hospital and home postcode were available for 1416; patients with incomplete data were evenly distributed between deprivation quartiles (table 1). The number of patients reaching hospital within three hours fell from 105/407 (25.8%) in the most affluent quartile to 57/317 (17.9%) in the most deprived quartile (p = 0.037, χ2 on ranks, table 1), most of the observed difference lying between the most affluent quartile and the rest. Among 1316 patients with CT data available, 164 (12.5%) had haemorrhagic strokes, but there was no difference in the proportion reaching hospital within three hours. Of 1374 patients with data available, 428 (31.1%) had their symptoms present on waking, and fewer of these reached hospital within three hours (16.4% v 23.7%, p = 0.002, χ2); 10.5% of such patients from the most deprived quartile arrived at hospital within three hours, compared with 25.4% of those from the most affluent quartile (p = 0.002, χ2 on ranks).

    Table 1

    Patients reaching hospital within three hours of symptom onset

    There were no significant differences between deprivation quartiles for GP list size, distance to hospital, or ambulance response times (table 1). There were higher rates of hospital admission in patients from more deprived areas, and this reflected higher rates of death from stroke in persons resident in such areas (table 1).


    Patients from affluent areas get to hospital sooner following stroke. This does not reflect differences in the distance to hospital, ambulance response times, or GP list size. Public recognition of stroke symptoms and understanding of the importance of early hospital admission may be greater in those living in affluent areas. Efforts to reduce time to hospital following stroke should include specific attention to public education targeted at those living in deprived areas.


    We are grateful to all of those who have contributed to the Lothian Stroke Register. MRM acknowledges the support of the Brain and Spine Foundation.