Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Stem cells and neurological disease
  1. R A Barker,
  2. M Jain,
  3. R J E Armstrong,
  4. M A Caldwell
  1. Cambridge Centre for Brain Repair, Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 2PY, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
 R A Barker; 

Statistics from

The therapeutic implications and application of stem cells for the nervous system

There has recently been a great deal of interest in stem cells and the nervous system, in terms of their potential for deciphering developmental issues as well as their therapeutic potential. In this editorial we will critically appraise the different types of stem cells, their therapeutic implications, and the applications to which they have been put, with the hope that the hype that surround these cells can be distinguished from the scientific reality.


Stem cells were originally defined in the haematological system, but more recently have been found in a multitude of other sites, including the brain. These cells all share the same properties of self-renewal and multipotentiality1 and various different types and therapeutic strategies have been defined with respect to the nervous system (Table 1, fig 1).

Table 1

Essential properties of stem cells for use in clinical transplantation

The reasons for these cells receiving such attention for the treatment of neurological disorders relates to their:

  1. capacity to proliferate in culture with the prospect that large numbers of cells can be derived from a limited source;

  2. potential to be harvested from the patients themselves;

  3. ability to migrate and disseminate following implantation within the adult CNS;

  4. possible tropism for areas of pathology;

  5. ease of manipulation using viral and non-viral gene transfer methods;

  6. ability to better integrate into normal brain cytoarchitecture with the potential for physiologically regulated release of substances.

We will briefly discuss the different types of stem cells and how they have been applied to neurological disease, especially Parkinson’s disease, given the accepted view that this is the disease most amenable to cell replacement therapy.


Embryonic stem cells are derived from the inner cell mass of the embryonic blastula and are pluripotent with great proliferative potential, although with this comes the risk of teratomas. Much of the work to date has concentrated on mouse derived embryonic stem cells, which can be made to differentiate into neurons, including dopaminergic neurons.2 These latter cells have been shown to survive and ameliorate behavioural deficits in an animal mode of Parkinson’s disease,3 although in this study 20% of rats still developed teratomas at the transplant site. In contrast, Kim et al, using a different approach that relies on transfection with Nurr1 (a transcription factor involved in the differentiation of dopaminergic cells), have demonstrated functional efficacy without tumour formation.4

Human embryonic stem cells have now been isolated5 and grown in culture with enrichment for neuronal lineages, possible through exposure to a combination of growth factors and mitogens.6 These cells, when placed in the developing rat brain, can migrate widely and differentiate in a site specific fashion without the formation of teratomas.7 However, the safety of these cells needs further investigation before they can be considered for clinical use. Furthermore, the sensitive nature of this technology and the ethical issues surrounding it make it a very controversial source of tissue for cell replacement therapy and in this respect the issue of therapeutic cloning is a major concern.8


One of the long held dogmas is that neurogenesis in the adult mammalian central nervous system (CNS) does not occur, although there is now ample evidence to suggest that this is not the case. New neurons are derived in adulthood from a population of adult neural precursor cells (NPCs), which are primarily found in the subependymal layer of the ventricular zone and the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus, although they are also probably found in other sites.9,10 However, the behaviour of the NPCs found in all these sites is different, and may relate as much to the environment in which they find themselves as to their intrinsic properties. For example, nigral NPCs appear to only differentiate into astrocytes in situ or when grafted to the adult nigra, but when they are cultured in vitro or transplanted into the hippocampus they can form neurons.11 The function of these newborn neurons in the adult CNS is not known but they do have the characteristics of mature neurons with appropriate neurophysiological properties and evidence of integration into neuronal networks with functional synaptic transmission and behavioural effects.12,13

Although much of this work has been done in rodents there is now evidence of neurogenesis in the adult human hippocampus,14 with cells being grown from the adult human CNS.15 Thus, the potential for autologous grafts is possible, assuming that the NPCs are not themselves involved in the disease process,16 and has indeed already been attempted in one patient with Parkinson’s disease.17


An alternative source of autologous cells for grafting in patients with neurological disease are those derived from non-neural sources including the bone marrow, which contains a range of stem cells. This includes the haematopoietic stem cell, which when transplanted into irradiated recipients can migrate into the brain and differentiate into microglia, astrocytes, and possibly neurons.18 In addition, there are mesenchymal stem cells or bone marrow stromal cells, which when engrafted into the adult brain are capable of migration and survival and in vitro can be made to express markers of astrocytes, oligodendroglia, and neurons.19

Indeed they have even been associated with some functional benefit in a rodent model of Parkinson’s disease when transfected with the dopamine synthetic enzyme tyrosine hydroxylase.20 However, the robustness and efficiency of this system to produce neural cells is still poor, as is its widespread applicability to other types of non-neural stem cells. There is some evidence from cDNA microarray analysis that different stem cells may in fact have similar phenotypic potential irrespective of origin21–23 and, therefore, it is theoretically possible that stem cells derived from non-neural systems may be used for neural cell therapy through a transdifferentiation process. However, there have been recent concerns that such a process may be a result of cell fusion—namely adult somatic cells can appear to gain differentiation potential by fusion with less differentiated cells.24,25


Most of the work on stem cells and the CNS refers to NSCs that are derived from the neuroepithelium of the developing embryo. These cells respond in vitro to mitogens such as epidermal growth factor (EGF) and fibroblast growth factor (FGF2), and it is possible to expand cells from any region of the brain.26,27 As development progresses to adulthood there is considerable debate over the origin of NSCs, with recent suggestions that these cells may also originate from glia.28 Radial glia have classically been considered to be “scaffolding” cells along which cortical neuroblasts migrate to reach their final destination, after which they differentiate into astrocytes. However, recent in vitro and in situ studies suggest that the radial glial cells may be responsible for the production of newborn neurons, as well as their guidance to their final destinations within the cortex.29 The exact relationship of this cell type to the NSCs derived from the neuroepithelium is yet to be elucidated, although it is possible that as developmental time increases, stem cells have either neuroepithelial, radial glial, or finally astroglial characteristics, which all share the characteristic of nestin expression.28

The isolation of these cells is complicated because their culturing inevitably leads to a mixed population of progenitor and stem cells, which can better be described as expanded neural precursors (ENPs). In addition, the proliferation of ENPs in culture is not indefinite because there appears to be a set number of population doublings—the so-called “Hayflick limit”, equivalent to approximately 50 population doublings30 after which non-transformed cells enter replicative senescence and stop dividing. This effect seems to be species dependent, and although greater for human than rodent ENPs, obviously has important implications for their clinical application. Attempts to circumvent this problem with human cells has employed either a modification of the culture technique31 or the use of transducing vectors encoding an immortalising oncogene.32 These genetic manipulations may alter the behaviour of these cells even without tumorigenesis, and thus extrapolation of results from such cells to those found in the developing and adult CNS must be carried out with caution.

For ENPs to be of clinical value, they not only need to be propagated long term in culture, but must be able to differentiate appropriately, which is influenced both by intrinsic and external factors, such as the culture conditions.33 This having been said, neurons differentiating from growth factor responsive ENPs are typically GABAergic in phenotype, irrespective of species or region from which the cells were harvested in the embryo.34 So for most disorders, especially Parkinson’s disease, it will be necessary to switch or regulate their fate and a number of factors and methods have been suggested for the generation of dopaminergic neurons based on factors known to be important in their normal development (see also embryonic stem cell section; see figure 2).

Exposure of ENPs to sonic hedgehog (Shh)36 or transcription factors, including nurr1,37 has been shown to increase the yield of dopaminergic neurons obtained from these cells, although not all cell types respond to such stimulation, for example hNT neurons.38,39 However, in most cases only small numbers of such neurons emerge from these manipulations, and thus the search continues for a reliable culture method to obtain sufficient numbers of dopaminergic neurons.


The behaviour of embryonic NSCs following transplantation varies depending on the source of cell and animal model. In the case of human ENPs and the intact adult brain, it has been shown that they are able to generate neurons in vivo in regions of active neurogenesis such as the SVZ and hippocampus,40 but not when placed in non-neurogenic areas such as the striatum.41 The situation may be different in the diseased or damaged CNS (see table 1).

Parkinson’s disease

Early transplant studies using human ENPs showed some survival and dopaminergic differentiation, but the numbers were low.42 This may relate to the fact that in vitro, NPCs derived from the developing ventral mesencephalon lose the ability to spontaneously differentiate into dopaminergic cells after only a few divisions.43

Essential properties of stem cells for use in clinical transplantation

  • Capable of clonal propagation in vitro to ensure homogeneity

  • Genetic stability at high passage

  • Integration within the host brain following transplantation

  • Connectivity within host circuits

  • Migration and engraftment at sites of damage

  • Correct differentiation into appropriate neural cell types

  • Functional benefits

  • Lack of side effects

Thus, “pre-differentiation” of the ENPs prior to implantation would seem logical and this approach has been adopted with some success by Studer and colleagues.44 An alternative approach has been to employ ex vivo genetic techniques to modify cells prior to implantation to express tyrosine hydroxylase, which again has met with some success.45

Huntington’s disease

Transplantation repair in Huntington’s disease provides different challenges for ENPs, in that the transplanted cells must homotypically reconstruct circuitry. To date, studies using NSCs in this disorder are limited but there is some evidence of appropriate neuronal differentiation with human NSCs,46 although the functional efficacy and connectivity of these cells in repairing the brain has not been demonstrated.

Cerebral ischaemia

Cell replacement therapy for ischaemic injury has experimentally shown some promise. For example, transplantation of the MHP36 line (ReNeuron holdings) has been reported to ameliorate cognitive deficits in rodent models of ischaemia.47 However, the applicability of these findings to ENPs in general is uncertain because other similarly derived multipotential cell lines do not show such an ability.48 hNT neurons derived from a human teratocarcinoma cell line have also been shown to alleviate motor and behavioural deficits in animal models of ischaemia,49 although it is hard to attribute the functional recovery to circuit reconstruction given the histological findings.50 Nevertheless, some investigators have deemed this to be sufficient data to move to a clinical trial in patients with basal ganglia stroke and resultant motor deficits. Reassuringly, there has been no evidence for tumorigenesis or other adverse effects in the 12 patients who have been reported in the phase I study, although preliminary functional and imaging data are difficult to interpret because of the lack of an adequate control group.51 There is, however, at least some evidence of cell survival based on postmortem data 27 months post-transplantation.52

Demyelinating diseases

ENPs are also being considered to replace glial cells that have been lost to demyelinating or dysmyelinating disease. Animal models of global hypomyelination (eg the shiverer (Shi) mouse) have been used to examine the ability of transplanted ENPs to myelinate axons. Oligodendrocytes constitute a very small component of the differentiated cells that emerge spontaneously in vitro from both EGF/FGF-2-expanded ENPs27 and most of the genetically immortalised stem cell lines.53 However, when such cells are transplanted into the myelin deficient environment, an increase in oligodendroglial differentiation has been reported, which is associated with some myelination and in some cases a degree of functional recovery.53,54


In addition to their potential to directly replace cells lost to disease and thereby reconstruct the CNS, NSCs might also serve a role as efficient and flexible vectors for the sustained, local delivery of neuroactive compounds to the brain—eg neurotrophic factors for neuroprotection, or to replace proteins lost because of single gene defects. In most envisioned scenarios this would involve genetically engineering the NSCs to direct, and regulate, the expression of therapeutic gene products (ex vivo gene therapy).

Treatment of genetic disorders

The aetiology of a number of rare, but devastating, inherited neurological conditions can be fully attributed to the loss of function of a single gene that encodes for a metabolically or developmentally critical enzyme. The ability of stem cells to deliver functional enzymes diffusely in such neurogenetic degenerative conditions has been explored in some prototypical animal models such as that for mucopolysaccharidosis type VII (MPS VII, Morquio).55

Neurotrophins and cytokines for neuroprotection

The understanding that the differentiation and survival of neurons in development is dependent on them receiving adequate and specific trophic support has meant that a number of cell delivery systems have been examined, including NSCs. Such a delivery strategy is attractive compared to a viral vector based delivery system because the host brain is not genetically manipulated, preventing insertional mutagenesis and preserving the function of neurons in the host. In addition, NSCs can be fully characterised such that the level of production of the growth factor can be standardised, and, finally, extra safety features could be incorporated, such as a “suicide cassette”, which would allow for elimination of cells should it be necessary.56

Chemotherapeutic agents

Obtaining adequate local concentrations of cytotoxic drugs impedes the chemotherapy of primary brain tumours. Based on their previous work indicating that the C17.2 NSC line was highly migratory in the adult brain, Snyder and colleagues retrovirally transfected this cell line to express the anti-mitotic compound cytosine deaminase. These cells were implanted into animals with experimentally induced gliomas and appeared to migrate preferentially towards the tumours, which decreased in size.57 In a similar vein, the same group has recently reported a method by which the migratory ability of this line can be harnessed as a “Trojan horse” to deliver therapeutic viruses to intracerebral tumours.58,59 Although such results require confirmation and more characterisation, they suggest that certain ENPs may show a tropism for areas of pathology and may be of use in chemotherapy.

Drug discovery and therapeutics

Finally, stem cells are an attractive option for commercial organisations interested in drug discovery.39


Stem cells are emerging as one of the most exciting new areas of neuroscience, not only in terms of revealing insights into normal development, but also as a therapeutic agent for a range of neurological diseases. In both of these aspects, they will impinge on neurological practice by providing insights into mechanisms of disease as well as curative cell therapies. However, the development of such approaches requires patience and any translation from the laboratory to the clinic must be undertaken slowly and based on sound experimental data. A failure to do so will not only undermine those involved in this type of research, but will prematurely dash the hopes of many patients and their neurologists.

The different types of stem cells

Development of midbrain dopamine (DA) neurons. Initial specification requires the patterning information that is provided by sonic hedgehog (shh) and fibroblast growth factor 8 (FGF8). The Lmx1b and nurr1 transcription factors are essential for different aspects of DA differentiation. The ptx3 transcription factor and the retinoid synthesising enzyme Aldh1 are specific markers of developing DA neurons in the ventral midbrain, but their roles are still largely unknown. Adapted from Goridis & Rohrer, 2002.35


The authors’ own works are supported by the MRC, PDS, Royal Society and Merck Sharp, and Dohme. We apologise to all those whose work has not been cited because of space constraints.

The therapeutic implications and application of stem cells for the nervous system


Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.