Article Text

Download PDFPDF
DJ-1 mutations in Parkinson’s disease
  1. D G Healy1,
  2. P M Abou-Sleiman1,
  3. E M Valente2,
  4. W P Gilks1,
  5. K Bhatia3,
  6. N Quinn3,
  7. A J Lees1,
  8. N W Wood1
  1. 1Department of Molecular Neuroscience, Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK
  2. 2CSS hospital, IRCCS, San Giovanni, Rotondo, CSS-Mendel Institute, Rome, Italy
  3. 3Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
 Professor N W Wood
 Department of Molecular Neuroscience, Institute of Neurology and National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK;


Mutations in the DJ-1 gene have recently been shown to cause autosomal recessive Parkinson’s disease. To estimate the prevalence of this mutation, an analysis was undertaken of 39 index cases of Parkinson’s disease in whom a family history suggested autosomal recessive inheritance. No DJ-1 mutations were found in these patients, indicating that this gene is unlikely to be of numerical significance in clinical practice. The hypothesis was also tested that young onset Parkinson’s disease patients in whom, despite extensive analysis, only a single heterozygous parkin mutation was found, might harbour a second mutation in the DJ-1 gene—that is, digenic inheritance. No patient was found with a single mutation in both DJ-1 and parkin genes, making this mode of inheritance unlikely. Finally it was confirmed that PARK6 and PARK7 (DJ-1), despite being phenotypically similar and mapping to the same small chromosomal region of 1p36, are caused by mutations in separate genes.

  • DJ-1
  • parkin heterozygote mutation
  • Parkinson’s disease

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.


  • Competing interests: none declared