Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Spinal cord infarction: clinical and magnetic resonance imaging findings and short term outcome
  1. C Masson1,
  2. J P Pruvo2,
  3. J F Meder2,
  4. C Cordonnier3,
  5. E Touzé4,
  6. V de la Sayette6,
  7. M Giroud5,
  8. J L Mas4,
  9. D Leys3,
  10. for the Study Group on Spinal Cord Infarction of the French Neurovascular Society
  1. 1Department of Neurology, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France
  2. 2Department of Neuroradiology
  3. 3Department of Neurology, Lille, France
  4. 4Department of Neurology, Paris Ste Anne, France
  5. 5Department of Neurology, Dijon, France
  6. 6Department of Neurology, Caen, France
  1. Correspondence to:
 C Masson
 Department of Neurology, Beaujon Hospital, 100 bd du Général Leclerc, 92110 Clichy, France;


Background: Most studies on spinal cord infarction have been conducted in single centres; they usually consisted of case reports, or of larger series of patients recruited over a large period of time, with heterogeneous diagnostic procedures. Therefore, the clinical and radiological presentation of spinal cord infarcts and their short term outcome remain poorly understood.

Objective: To define clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, and short term outcome in patients with spinal cord infarcts.

Methods: The authors prospectively included patients within 10 days of onset. An MRI scan was required and repeated when initially normal.

Results: Twenty eight consecutive patients were included over a 24 month period in 16 neurological centres. The infarct was cervical in seven patients, thoracic in three, thoracolumbar in 15, and restricted to the conus in three. On axial MRI scans the infarct was located in the central territory of the anterior spinal artery in 21 patients, and in the peripheral arterial territory in three. At month two, 15 patients had a good outcome and 13 had a poor outcome, including three deaths. Patients who, at onset, could not walk, had bladder dysfunction, or proprioceptive deficits were more likely to have a poor outcome. At month two, pain had occurred in 10 of the 25 survivors and was associated neither with the initial severity, nor the extent of the infarct on MRI.

Conclusion: The two month outcome mainly depends on the initial severity of the neurological deficit; however, a few patients with a severe impairment at onset had a good outcome, especially when proprioception remained normal at onset. The study does not support the hypothesis that pain occurs more frequently in small spinal infarcts.

  • CSF, cerebrospinal fluid
  • ECG, electrocardiogram
  • MRI, magnetic resonance imaging
  • spinal cord infarcts
  • MRI findings in spinal cord infarcts
  • prognosis of spinal cord infarcts

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.