Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Ischaemic stroke in chagasic patients
  1. A L Teixeira, Jr1,
  2. M M Teixeira1
  1. 1Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
  1. Correspondence to:
 A L Teixeira Jr
 Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Departamento de Morfologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Av. Antônio Carlos, 6627, Pampulha, Belo Horizonte MC 31270-901, Brazil;
  1. F J Carod-Artal2,
  2. A P Vargas2,
  3. M Melo2,
  4. T A Horan2
  1. 2Neurology Department, Sarah Hospital, Brasilia, Brazil

    Statistics from

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    We read with interest the paper by Carod-Artal et al1 that showed the relevance of Chagas’ disease as a stroke risk factor in patients of South American origin. They also confirmed a textbook view2 (not hitherto demonstrated) that cardioembolism is the main cause of stroke in Chagas’ disease, in 52% of cases. This reflects in part the underlying chagasic cardiomyopathy, characterised by congestive heart failure and arrhythmias, present in 46% of chagasic patients as compared with 25% of non-chagasic patients.

    Despite the lack of comparison of stroke characteristics between both groups, one very interesting finding was the significant percentage of chagasic patients who developed stroke without any known vascular risk factors or cardiopathy. As the authors stated, undetected cardiovascular disease could account for at least part of this finding. The indeterminate form of the disease is defined by the presence of infection confirmed by serological tests, in the absence of symptoms or of electrocardiographic or radiological abnormalities. Twenty five % of subjects with the indeterminate form of the disease may present significant structural and/or functional abnormalities when they are fully evaluated by more sensitive methods, such as ergometry and autonomic tests.3

    Another possible explanation proposed by the authors would be the vasculitis phenomenon. Although there is good experimental evidence to suggest that changes in the microvasculature may contribute to chagasic heart disease,4 much less is known about the possible involvement of central nervous system microvasculature in Chagas’ disease. Indeed, most studies point to an important role for endothelin in the pathogenesis of microvascular changes in the chagasic heart,[4 5] but we are unaware of any similar studies of the central nervous system.

    The authors also suggest the need for primary prevention in all patients with Chagas’ disease cardiomyopathy. This is a strong recommendation, as most chagasic patients derive from poor social economic backgrounds and have poor access to the health system.1 Chronic oral anticoagulant therapy is known to cause frequent clinical complications, especially bleeding; an alternative approach could be use of the low dose anticoagulant therapy that has been recently suggested for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis.6 However, further studies are still needed to investigate this possibility specifically in Chagas’ disease.


    Authors’ reply

    In our recent study, we demonstrated that at least 52.2% of chagasic strokes are due to cardioembolism and 36.8% are of undetermined cause.1 A significant proportion of these cryptogenic chagasic strokes may also be cardioembolic in origin.2,3 We therefore encourage the use of transoesophageal echocardiography in all patients with chagasic stroke, especially for the better definition of aetiology in the 36% having strokes of undetermined cause.

    The monitored administration of warfarin is remarkably effective in the reduction of stroke recurrence in persons with cardioembolic stroke.4,5 Thus, we recommend oral anticoagulation for all individuals with chagasic stroke, who have demonstrated risk factors for cardioembolism. To our knowledge, no case control study analysing these factors has yet been carried out.

    Stroke of arterial origin in Chagas’ disease seems much less common than in the general population of stroke patients.1 Evidence for secondary prevention of stroke of arterial origin with oral anticoagulation as in the Warfarin-Aspirin Recurrent Stroke Study (WARSS)6 and European/Australasian Stroke Prevention in Reversible Ischaemia Trial (ESPRIT)7 clinical trials is controversial. Our follow up experience with the administration of secondary anticoagulation to persons with chagasic stroke, whether cardioembolic or not, has been encouraging in the lack of significant complications. We are therefore currently investigating the efficacy of antithrombotic therapy in chagasic stroke patients, using either low or moderate dosages of anticoagulants. Until the results of this or similar investigations are available, antithrombotic prophylaxis should be individualised in persons with chagasic stroke of undetermined cause, on the basis of the estimated risk of recurrent stroke v the risk of complications during anticoagulation.

    We thank M M Teixeira and A L Teixeira for their comments and interest in our article.