Article Text

This article has a correction. Please see:

Size of the treatment effect on cognition of cholinesterase inhibition in Alzheimer’s disease
Free
  1. K Rockwood
  1. Correspondence to:
 K Rockwood
 Centre for Health Care of the Elderly, 5955 Veterans’ Memorial Lane, Suite 1421, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3H 2E1; kenneth.rockwooddal.ca

Abstract

Background: Six cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) have been tested in people with Alzheimer’s disease, using methods currently required for regulatory approval. The clinical importance of their treatment effects is controversial.

Objective: To determine whether cholinesterase inhibition produces treatment effects in Alzheimer’s disease that are large enough to be clinically detectable.

Methods: Overview analysis of published trials of ChEIs in which the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale—Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) and a global clinical measure were primary outcomes. Two quantitative summary measures of the treatment effect (Cohen’s d and the standardised response mean (SRM)) were calculated and presented as funnel plots. Observed cases analyses and intention to treat (ITT) with the last observation carried forward (LOCF) analyses were compared.

Results: The median Cohen’s d effect sizes (ES) using ITT samples with LOCF for the ADAS-Cog were: low dose of a ChEI (n = 8 studies) median ES = 0.15, range = 0.03–0.22; medium dose (n = 13) median ES = 0.23, range = 0.12–0.29; high dose (n = 9) median ES = 0.28, range = 0.01–0.31. In general, the ES were larger when calculated as SRMs (for example, high dose ChEI studies, median SRM = 0.47; range = 0.30–0.63) and highest in the observed cases analyses (for example, high dose median SRM = 0.56, range = 0.35–0.78).

Global clinical scales produced similar estimates of ES (for example, high dose ChEI, ITT/LOCF median Cohen’s d = 0.29, range = 0.20–0.47).

Conclusions: ChEIs produce small-moderate effect sizes in clinical trials which are reproducible and demonstrate a dose response. Better descriptions of the patterns of treatment response are needed to guide individual patient decisions about the effectiveness of treatment, but group effects are evident and appear large enough to be clinically detectable.

  • Alzheimer’s disease
  • systematic review
  • cholinesterase inhibitors
  • AD, Alzheimer’s disease
  • ADAS-Cog, Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale—Cognitive Subscale
  • ChEIs, cholinesterase inhibitors
  • CIBIC-Plus, Clinician’s Interview-Based Impression of Change Plus Caregiver Input
  • ITT, intention to treat
  • LOCF, last observation carried forward
  • OC, observed cases
  • SRM, standardised response mean

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Supplementary materials

  • Publisher's Correction

    Please note that there is an error in Figure 1. The corrected version is provided here.

    The figure is available as a downloadable PDF (printer friendly file).

    If you do not have Adobe Reader installed on your computer,
    you can download this free-of-charge, please Click here

     

    Files in this Data Supplement:

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: The author has conducted trials and/or received research and/or consulting and/or special fees from each of the following companies whose products are included in the review: Bayer; Janssen-Ortho; Novartis; Pfizer.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles

  • Correction
    BMJ Publishing Group Ltd