Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Mirror movements in neurology
  1. S F Farmer
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr S F Farmer
 National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK;

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

There is a high prevalence of mirror movements in patients with asymmetric parkinsonism

Examination of patients for the presence or absence of mirror movements does not normally form part of a routine neurological investigation nor is this simple part of the motor examination normally taught to medical students and trainee neurologists. The examination requires the examiner only to observe both hands during voluntary fine finger movements of each hand in turn; for example, sequentially pressing each finger against the thumb of one hand whilst the other hand is relaxed. Mirroring occurs when there are visible involuntary movements of the “relaxed” hand that appear to replicate the timing and type of movement being carried out by the voluntarily activated hand.

Mirror movements occur during normal motor development and may reflect children’s inability to suppress the activity of the ipsilateral motor cortex during attempted unilateral activation, possibly due to immaturity of transcallosal inhibition.1 Mirror movements are common at the age of 4 years, but by age 11, if they are seen at all, they are usually weak and not sustained. Significant mirror movements are rare in adults and if present represent abnormalities of the central motor drive to the relaxed limb. These abnormal mirror movements are of great interest. Mirror movements are usually abnormal when they persist into adulthood, when they are particularly marked, very precise in their spatio-temporal characteristics, and cannot be suppressed (except through “trick” contractions of “antagonist” muscles, for example, lifting the whole hand to avoid a mirrored key strike during typing). In contrast to developmental mirror movements, congenital pathological mirror movements reflect clear abnormalities in corticospinal tract function. Neurophysiological experiments have demonstrated that this type of abnormal mirrored activity is precisely time locked to voluntary activity. Exploration of the fast conducting corticospinal tract by measuring EMG evoked by focal trans-cutaneous magnetic or electrical stimulation of the motor cortex reveals in congenital mirror movement subjects abnormal ipsilateral and bilateral fast conducting corticospinal projections.2 In addition, cross correlation and coherence analyses between left and right EMG or between EEG and EMG, confirm that during attempted unilateral voluntary contraction there is central motor drive that abnormally synchronises the discharges of left and right hand muscle motoneurones indicating that they share an abnormal common presynaptic input that is responsible for the mirroring.3 Congenital mirror movements occur when there is abnormal routing of corticospinal axons such as in X linked Kallmann’s and Klippel-Feil syndromes. They are also seen in congenital hemiplegia in which a prenatal insult (probably before 28 weeks gestation) leads to persistence of functional ipsilateral corticospinal pathways from the undamaged hemisphere, which may help to sustain fine motor function despite significant contralateral central motor pathway damage.4

Mirror movements may be acquired. Weak mirroring may be observed after hemiplegic stroke. This phenomenon however is not produced (sadly) by significant and precise (and therefore useful) drive from the undamaged corticospinal pathways but rather appears to reflect an overall increased activation of the undamaged ipsilateral motor cortex.5 The phenomenon of mirror dystonia is an extremely useful diagnostic physical sign. Strictly speaking, these are not mirror movements but rather a dystonic movement emerges in a dystonic limb when it is relaxed and the opposite limb is activated. Thus there is overflow of central motor drive, possibly because of a failure of the normal cortical-cortical inhibitory processes whose malfunction is also one of the basic mechanisms of dystonia.

The paper by Espay et al6 in this issue of the journal helpfully extends the clinical significance of mirror movements. Espay et al describe a high prevalence (24/27 subjects) of mirror movements in patients with asymmetric parkinsonism (due to idiopathic Parkinson’s disease); furthermore, the degree of mirroring correlates with the degree of asymmetry of the parkinsonism. In contrast to dystonia, the mirror movements of parkinsonism emerge in the lesser affected limb and are mirror movements. The precise physiological mechanisms of mirror movements in parkinsonism are not yet understood and the mechanisms of mirror movement in extra pyramidal disorders will not the same as those of congenital mirror movements which reflect pyramidal tract dysfunction. Mirroring in parkinsonism may be a transient phenomenon; perhaps the programs which are suppressed during motor development remerge due to changes in the drive to cortex from basal ganglia structures. Espay et al6 demonstrate that mirror movements are a common early physical sign of Parkinson’s disease and are useful in confirming that there is a problem with voluntary movement. Whatever neurophysiological mechanisms ultimately explain mirroring in parkinsonism, Espay et al have done neurology a real service in highlighting that this very useful physical sign occurs in extra pyramidal as well as pyramidal disorders. Mirroring is a physical sign that I shall be teaching future students and neurology trainees about.

There is a high prevalence of mirror movements in patients with asymmetric parkinsonism



  • Competing interests: none declared

Linked Articles