Article Text
Abstract
Anosognosia for hemiplegia (AHP) is conventionally defined/diagnosed by generic questions about awareness of limb plegia. However, unawareness of inability to perform tasks requiring bilateral use of limbs is more widespread and outlasts generic unawareness of plegia. Some patients consistently overestimate bilateral task ability. Our aim was to assess how well specific questions about bilateral task ability predict whether patients consistently overestimate their abilities. Six statistical indices were calculated to rank the questions for predictiveness of consistency of overestimation of bilateral task ability. Overall, bimanual questions are better predictors than bipedal questions of consistent overestimation. Three bimanual and two bipedal questions had both sensitivity and specificity above 80%. On the basis of accuracy and discriminability, one bimanual and one bipedal question that performed maximally could be used for a quick bedside heuristic index. For a more thorough diagnostic, especially for research, five bimanual and two bipedal questions were good predictors, and should be used. For both purposes, such tests should be given in combination with conventional generic questions assessing awareness of limb plegia, since the two kinds of question reflect different kinds of unawareness of motor incapacity.
- AHP, anosognosia for hemiplegia
- LBD, left brain damaged
- RBD, right brain damaged
- anosognosia
- cerebrovascular disorders
- hemiplegia
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
-
Competing interests: none declared
-
Correspondence may also be addressed to Dr I Nimmo-Smith at ian.nimmo-smithmrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk or to R Tegnér at richard.tegnertelia.com