Article Text

This article has a correction. Please see:

Download PDFPDF
Misleading conclusions on rt-PA treatment in the very elderly
  1. P C A J Vroomen1,
  2. M Uyttenbogaart1,
  3. G J Luijckv1
  1. 1Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen 9700 RB, Netherlands; c.a.j.vroomen@neuro.umcg.nl

    Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    The effectiveness of rt-PA in the elderly is an important but as yet incompletely resolved topic. In a recent paper in this journal,1 Mouradian et al provide convincing data that patients older than 80 years who receive rt-PA are less likely to have a favourable outcome than their younger counterparts. This is in keeping with our own data showing that 5 of 24 patients (21%) treated with rt-PA aged 80 years or older were independent (mRS 0–2) after three months, compared with 39 of 77 patients …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Competing interests: None declared.

    Footnotes

    • Competing interests: None declared.

    Linked Articles

    • Correction
      BMJ Publishing Group Ltd