Article Text

Download PDFPDF
The utility of the Cambridge Behavioural Inventory in neurodegenerative disease
  1. C Wedderburn1,
  2. H Wear1,
  3. J Brown1,
  4. S J Mason1,
  5. R A Barker1,2,
  6. J Hodges2,3,
  7. C Williams-Gray1,2
  1. 1
    Cambridge Centre for Brain Repair, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
  2. 2
    Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
  3. 3
    MRC-Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, UK
  1. Professor John Hodges, Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute, University of New South Wales, Barker St, Randwick, Sydney 2031, Australia; j.hodges{at}powmri.edu.au

Abstract

We investigated the utility of the Cambridge Behavioural Inventory (CBI), a carer-completed questionnaire, in a large cohort with Parkinson’s disease (PD) (n = 215). In a sub-cohort of 112 patients with PD, the CBI was found to be a valid instrument compared with the Neuropsychiatric Inventory, PDQ-39 and UPDRS, with high internal consistency. Furthermore, in the whole cohort, the CBI was sensitive to changes in behaviour with disease progression. Comparison between CBI scores in PD and other neurodegenerative diseases, including Huntington’s disease (HD) (n = 75), Alzheimer’s disease (AD) (n = 96) and frontal variant frontotemporal dementia (fvFTD) (n = 64), revealed distinct profiles for each disease. Predominant deficits were “sleep”’ and “self care” in PD; “memory” in HD and AD; and “motivation” and “stereotypic behaviours” in fvFTD. The CBI is a robust, easy-to-use and valid instrument, which has the capacity to discriminate between neurodegenerative diseases, and may be of value in monitoring therapeutic interventions.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None declared.