Article Text

Download PDFPDF
A triumph of hope and expediency over experience and reason?
  1. Nicolas U Weir1,
  2. Martin S Dennis2
  1. 1
    Foothills Hospital, Calgary, Canada
  2. 2
    Division of Clinical Neurosciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
  1. N U Weir

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

The practice of using outcomes data to indicate the quality of hospital stroke services is based on the assumption that, provided adjustment is made for differences in the characteristics of patients admitted and the play of chance, then most of the residual variation is likely to reflect differences in the quality of care. The paper by Lingsma1 and colleagues, published in this issue of J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry (see page 888), helps to show the extent to which this thinking is wrong and ultimately unhelpful in driving forward improvements in stroke care.

The study tested an idealised system of comparing the outcomes of patients admitted to 10 Dutch hospitals and …

View Full Text


  • Competing interests: None declared.

Linked Articles