Article Text
Abstract
Background: Dystonia is a complex clinical syndrome originated by a wide range of aetiologies. The diagnosis of dystonia is made after the evaluation of aetiological, phenomenological and genetic factors.1 Medications, except in patients with dopa-responsive dystonia, are of limited efficacy. Botulinum toxin injections are not applicable to patients with generalised dystonia, since many muscular groups contribute to disability.2
Clinical studies in children and adults with primary generalised dystonia (PGD) have reported beneficial effects of bilateral GPi deep brain stimulation (DBS) in both motor symptoms and disability produced by dystonia3 4 5 as well as a favourable impact of DBS in the health-related quality of life (HRQoL).6 Some clinical aspects of GPi stimulation in primary dystonia still remain controversial such as the influence of disease duration or age at onset in determining the postoperative clinical outcome.
Results: The authors report the results of a multicentric study designed to assess the tolerability and clinical effects of bilateral pallidal DBS on motor impairment, functional disability, quality of life, pain and mood in patients with medically refractory primary generalised or segmental dystonia.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Members of “GESPALDIS”: C Magariños, R Figueiras, L Cabañes (H Ramón y Cajal, Madrid); F Escamilla-Sevilla, MJ Katati, JM Martin-Linares (H Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada); G Bilbao, I Lambarri, JC Gómez, O Rodriguez, R Villoria (H de Cruces, Baracaldo); F Alonso, J Ayerbe, J Muñiz (Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid); B Oliver, M Aguilar, D Badenes (H Mútua de Terrassa); P Roldán, F Talamantes (H Clínic, València); A Sésar, M Gelabert (H Clínico Universitario, Santiago de Compostela); L López, S Giménez-Roldán, F Garcia (H Gregorio Marañón, Madrid); A Gironell, J Molet, RB Pascual-Sedano, R Rodríguez (Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona).
Competing interests None.
Ethics approval Ethics approval was provided by the Ethics Committee at each institution participating in the study.
Patient consent Obtained.
Members of “GESPALDIS”: C Magariños, R Figueiras, L Cabañes (H Ramón y Cajal, Madrid); F Escamilla-Sevilla, MJ Katati, JM Martin-Linares (H Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada); G Bilbao, I Lambarri, JC Gómez, O Rodriguez, R Villoria (H de Cruces, Baracaldo); F Alonso, J Ayerbe, J Muñiz (Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid); B Oliver, M Aguilar, D Badenes (H Mútua de Terrassa); P Roldán, F Talamantes (H Clínic, València); A Sésar, M Gelabert (H Clínico Universitario, Santiago de Compostela); L López, S Giménez-Roldán, F Garcia (H Gregorio Marañón, Madrid); A Gironell, J Molet, RB Pascual-Sedano, R Rodríguez (Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona).
Provenance and Peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.