Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Head injury
026 A perspective of Head Injury: Management and Outcome
  1. G Teasdale

    Author information: Professor Sir Graham Teasdale became Chairman of NHS Quality Improvement Scotland (NHS QIS) in 2006 after a distinguished career in Neurosurgery. From 1981 to 2003 he was Professor and Head of the Department of Neurosurgery, University of Glasgow, and was also Chairman of the University's School of Neuroscience and President of the Society of British Neurological Surgeons. Prior to joining NHS QIS he was President of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Glasgow. He is the author of some 300 refereed publications on topics including the Glasgow Coma Scale and the management of head injury. He is an Honorary International Fellow of the American College of Surgeons and has received a number of Honorary Fellowships, degrees and awards from around the world including the Gold Medal of the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies. He was elected Scot of the Year in Science and Medicine in 1996 and was made a Knight Bachelor in the 2006 New Year Honours list for services to Neurosurgery and victims of head injuries.


Abstract: Modern understanding and care of head injuries began in the 1960s when artificial ventilation, originating in use in polio, was applied to severely injured victims. The impetus to research and advances in management is still evolving. Better understanding of the pathology and patho-physiology of traumatic brain damage identified the fundamental structural and functional components. The distinction between primary and secondary damage pointed to the reduction of avoidable deaths and disability as the target of many efforts in management. Reliable clinical assessment and with the Glasgow Coma Scale, advances in intracranial imaging and their combination in guidelines such as those of SIGN and NICE have had clear success in the early diagnosis and surgery for intracranial haematoma. Outcome has also been improved by better management of extra cranial complications through trauma systems and intensive care. Despite extensive fundamental research, less progress has been made in the “neuroprotective” management of primary diffuse damage resulting from axonal shearing or from the consequences of ischaemic insults. The recognition that survivors of intensive care could face substantial subsequent problems led to the need to move beyond mortality as an index of outcome. The multi-dimensional consequences of brain damage, spanning mental, physical and social fields led to the creation of many descriptive systems and classifications. It is important to recognise the purpose for which each was introduced. The Glasgow outcome scale was developed to provide a short, simple overview categorisation, particularly applicable to groups of patients. The approach has proved valuable in research linking outcome to early severity, in developing predictive systems and in comparing series of patients managed in different ways. Its utility has been advanced by the development of an extended and structured, more consistent approach. Although initially introduced for severe injuries, a prospective study of a representative cohort of all head injuries admitted to hospital showed that it is able to portray the consequences of even so called mild injury, including the remarkably high incidence and persistence of incomplete recovery. The factors leading to this, the influence of adverse “emotional indices” and their potential amelioration are a priority for further research, as is the high rate of mortality, which continues for many years after the acute stage.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.