Purpose We retrospectively evaluated the effect of brain atrophy on the outcome of patients after a large cerebral infarct.
Methods Between June 2003 and Oct 2008, 134 of 2975 patients with stroke were diagnosed as having a large cerebral infarct. The mean age of the patients was 70 (21–95) y. The mean infarct volume was 223.6±95.2 cm3 (46.0–491.0). The inter-caudate distance (ICD) was calculated as an indicator of brain atrophy by measuring the hemi-ICD of the intact side and then multiplying by two to account for brain swelling at the infarct site. The mean ICD was 18.0±4.8 mm (9.6–37.6).
Results Forty-nine (36.6%) patients experienced a malignant clinical outcome (MCO) during management in the hospital. Thirty-one (23.1%) patients had a favourable functional outcome (FO) (modified Rankin scale (mRS) ≤3) and 49 (36.6%) had an acceptable functional outcome (AO) (mRS≤4) at 6 months after stroke onset. In the multivariate analysis, brain atrophy (ICD≥20 mm) had a significant and independent protective effect on MCO (p=0.003; OR=0.137; 95% CI 0.037 to 0.503). With respect to FO, the age and infarct volume reached statistical significance (p<0.001, OR=0.844, 95% CI 0.781 to 0.913; p=0.006, OR=0.987, 95% CI 0.977 to 0.996, respectively). Brain atrophy (ICD≥20 mm) was negatively associated only with AO (p=0.022; OR=0.164; 95% CI 0.035 to 0.767).
Conclusions Brain atrophy may have an association with clinical outcome after a large stroke by a trend of saving patients from an MCO but also by interfering with their functional recovery.
- Brain atrophy
- cerebral infarction
- fatal outcome
- functional outcome
- image analysis
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests None.
Ethics approval This study was conducted with the approval of the Seoul National University Hospital.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.