Background Among several aetiological factors, PARK2 mutations are the most common cause of Parkinson disease (PD) that result in degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra.
Methods In order to examine the contribution of PARK2 mutations and corresponding Parkin expression in blood of North West Indian PD patients, the authors screened 120 000 patients from 2001 to 2006 for features of PD using UK Parkinson disease society brain bank clinical diagnostic criteria (UKPDBBC), and tested PARK2 mutations in 69 of those that fulfilled this criteria. 43 controls lacking extrapyramidal signs were also analysed.
Results The PCR analysis revealed the occurrence of homozygous deletions in 28 of 69 samples analysed (40.5%) represented by exon-1 (15.9%), exon-3 (11.5%), and exon-12 (11.5%). Sequencing revealed point mutations in exon 4 and exon 9 in six of these patients (8.7%) including one novel missense Gly1083Trp mutation in one patient. Parkin estimation was done by combination of immunolocalisation and FACS analysis revealing reduced Parkin expression among PD patients. The mutations in exons 1, 3 and 12 among sporadic PD patients were found to be higher among younger onset variants (age<45 years). This report also constitutes the first evidence that PARK 2 mutations contribute to the aberration in Parkin expression in blood leading to PD.
- Parkinson disease
- parkin expression
- early onset PD
- molecular biology
- movement disorders
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
See Editorial Commentary, p128
MV and AA contributed equally to this paper
Supplementary material is published online only at http://jnnp.bmj.com/content/vol81/issue2
Funding We acknowledge the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) and ICMR (SWG/Neurology/13/2001-NCD-1), New Delhi, for providing financial assistance in the form of a fellowship and grant respectively. Other funders: Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi.
Competing interests None.
Ethics approval Ethics approval was provided by the Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Patient consent Obtained.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.